A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting
Highlights from José Enrique's interview- 2 minute listen
Nov 8, 2023
Summary
I reviewed Ixia Hawkeye to assess GPON and DOCSIS networks' performance, utilizing features that allow detailed analysis of network tests such as video streaming. Unlike SolarWinds, it pinpoints specific areas for improvement, yet enhanced network performance would be beneficial.
Pros
"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. "
Cons
"Improvements in network performance are essential."
What is our primary use case?
Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, various performance tests are carried out, including but not limited to traceroute tests, STP tests, and other performance assessments such as video streaming tests.
How has it helped my organization?
The testing process is integrated with SolarWinds and other tools, such as Python, to facilitate a comprehensive assessment. To execute these tests, you select the appropriate API, conduct the generic test, and store the results in an internal database. Subsequently, you analyze these outcomes to identify areas where network performance can be enhanced.
What is most valuable?
Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.
What needs improvement?
Improvements in network performance are essential.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It contributes to enhancing performance, but at times, it may be essential to combine it with tools like SolarWinds or others to achieve even better performance or gain more detailed insights.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability capabilities ten out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate its customer support services nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing structure is contingent on the number of devices within your network. In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated SolarWinds as well.
What other advice do I have?
The platform is exceptionally user-friendly and offers the flexibility to easily create and execute programming scripts, whether it's for Linux using Python or batch scripting. I have a strong preference for these features. Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
*Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
