Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Wireless WAN Logo

Cisco Wireless WAN Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Cisco Wireless WAN?

Cisco Wireless WAN refers to the wireless networking solutions provided by Cisco Systems, a leading technology company specializing in networking and communication products. Cisco Wireless WAN enables organizations to establish wireless connections and extend their wide area network (WAN) connectivity using cellular networks.

Get the Cisco Wireless WAN Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and more!
Cisco Wireless WAN is the #4 ranked solution in top Wireless WAN solutions. PeerSpot users give Cisco Wireless WAN an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Cisco Wireless WAN is most commonly compared to Ubiquiti Wireless: Cisco Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti Wireless. Cisco Wireless WAN is popular among the small business segment, accounting for 41% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 12% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless WAN
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Featured Cisco Wireless WAN reviews

Read more reviews

Cisco Wireless WAN mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless WAN in the Wireless WAN category stands at 3.8%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco Wireless WAN3.8%
Ubiquiti Wireless39.5%
Ruckus Wireless WAN35.0%
Other21.700000000000003%
Wireless WAN

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Wireless WAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless WANAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti WirelessAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WANAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless WAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless WANAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Ubiquiti Wireless4.039.5%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN4.211.8%95%28 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Cisco Wireless WAN offers ease of management, high speed, and reliability. It supports seamless integration with other Cisco products, advanced security features, and scalability. Users appreciate the ease of configuration, strong signal coverage, and user-friendly interface. Features like fast failover, clean access, and WiFi 6 support enhance network performance. The ability to manage large networks efficiently and the robust authentication capabilities are key highlights. The platform's stability and comprehensive documentation are also valued.
  • "The initial setup of Cisco Wireless WAN is one of the easiest on the market."
  • "It definitely makes our network and life much easier when using these features."
  • "The solution is reliable."

Room for Improvement

Cisco Wireless WAN has high costs and complex initial setup, which users find challenging. Its licensing and integration require enhancement. Users desire more user-friendly interfaces and centralized management. Improvement in technical support and feature expansion is sought. Users face compatibility issues, limited port design, and need better software and telemetry systems. There's demand for improved WiFi coverage, automation, reporting features, and integration with other technologies. Enhanced management capabilities and reduced pricing are highly desired.
  • "The cost is one of the higher in the industry."
  • "The CLI type is not very user-friendly."
  • "The price point is contentious as the licensing model seems complicated and unclear."

ROI

Cisco Wireless WAN is reliable, cost-effective, and reduces operational costs. It offers long-term reliability without frequent equipment purchases. Many users witness positive returns and appreciate its robust connectivity and data integrity. Some find the investment initially high but justified by coverage efficiency and the impressive device lifespan. Users value centralized control, enhanced productivity, and time savings. Despite a more expensive licensing structure than competitors, many experience significant returns when properly configured.

Pricing

Cisco Wireless WAN pricing is perceived as expensive, particularly due to annual licensing and support costs. Many users find the costs high, especially compared to alternatives like Aruba and HP. Licenses are often purchased on a three-year basis, but recurring fees for renewals and separate charges for network features add to the expense. Some users report substantial discounts based on order volume, but others highlight dissatisfaction with the pricing complexity and license structure.
  • "Cisco products generally have high list prices, but substantial discounts are available."
  • "The product is highly-priced."
  • "Cisco is much more expensive than the other vendor solutions."

Popular Use Cases

Cisco Wireless WAN is utilized primarily for Wi-Fi access in hospitals, corporate environments, educational institutions, and public locations. Businesses and educational campuses leverage it for seamless connectivity, ensuring network access for mobile, guest, and internal users. With deployments across diverse industries such as healthcare, finance, and retail, organizations use it to manage and support their wireless network infrastructure, ensuring reliable and flexible wireless connectivity for staff, students, and customers.

Service and Support

Cisco Wireless WAN customer service is highly rated, with many finding it responsive, knowledgeable, and supportive. Users appreciate its promptness in addressing issues, though some mention varying experiences depending on the engineer assigned. The team excels in solving complex problems, providing detailed reports, and maintaining communication. However, there are some concerns about response times and case continuity. While most are satisfied, others see room for faster, more consistent support.

Deployment

Many find Cisco Wireless WAN's initial setup straightforward and user-friendly, especially with experience and access to documentation. Deployment time varies greatly, from a mere hour to several months, influenced by factors like project scope and site complexity. While large-scale or global deployments may require skilled teams, smaller setups often succeed with minimal staff. Some mention initial challenges with configuration and integration, yet most agree it becomes manageable with familiarity and resources.

Scalability

Cisco Wireless WAN is widely regarded as scalable, effectively supporting large user bases. Many organizations have deployed it across various environments with high satisfaction. Users find it easy to expand usage with seamless integration and management. Licensing costs can be challenging, but technical scalability is praised. High ratings are common, with plans for growing deployment in multiple locations. Although there are limitations with on-premises versions, most praise its flexibility and adaptability to growing demands.

Stability

Cisco Wireless WAN is renowned for its stable performance, with many users reporting reliability, minimal crashes, and no glitches. It is praised for long-term use and consistent stability, although some power-related issues and configuration challenges have been noted. Antenna configuration poses occasional difficulties. While interference from other products may affect stability, users generally rate it highly, often nine out of ten, appreciating the dependable support provided by Cisco.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Cisco Wireless WAN Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise31
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise26
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
9%
Performing Arts
6%
Retailer
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Construction Company
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
5%
Transportation Company
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Logistics Company
3%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
University
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Photography Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%

Compare Cisco Wireless WAN with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Cisco Wireless WAN

Cisco Wireless WAN solutions leverage cellular technologies, such as 4G LTE and 5G, to provide high-speed and reliable wireless connectivity. These solutions offer a range of features and capabilities that enhance network performance, security, and manageability.

Cisco Wireless WAN Features & Benefits:

  • Enhanced Connectivity: Enables wireless connections over cellular networks for areas with limited wired connectivity.
  • High-Speed Data Transfer: Delivers fast data transfer rates for efficient file transmission and real-time collaboration.
  • Increased Mobility: Extends network connectivity to mobile devices and remote locations.
  • Reliable and Resilient Connectivity: Ensures reliable and uninterrupted connectivity with intelligent routing and failover capabilities.
  • Security and Data Protection: Integrates robust security features to safeguard data transmitted over the wireless network.
  • Centralized Management: Provides centralized control and visibility through management platforms like Cisco DNA Center and Cisco Meraki Dashboard.
  • Integration with Cisco Ecosystem: Seamlessly integrates with other Cisco networking solutions for a comprehensive network infrastructure.
  • Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing connectivity needs without compromising performance.
  • Application Optimization: Prioritizes critical applications and optimizes traffic for improved performance.
  • Industry Compatibility: Suitable for various industries, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

Cisco Wireless WAN empowers organizations with reliable, secure, and scalable wireless connectivity, enabling mobility and enhancing network performance and productivity.

Reviews from Real Users

PeerSpot user, Manager - Technology at a tech services company, states that "Recently, the most valuable and in-demand feature that users are enjoying is WiFi 6 support on the access points. The other good thing about Cisco Wireless LAN is how easily it provides clean access to the WiFi network."

Muhammad Alim Besari, Solution Architect at Packet System Indonesia, says that “Cisco Wireless LAN deliver the best wireless experience yet so easy to operate and manage.”

Zulfiqar Saeed, SE at The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, writes that "The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless WAN are its security functionality. We have a lab environment and we have to provide different authentications to the users which are easy to manage. Additionally, there is a lot of useful automation embedded into the system."

Cisco Wireless WAN customers

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)

Related questions

  • 7
When evaluating Wireless WAN, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 7
Does Avaya have a Wireless future?
  • 27
What is your experience with 802.1X when using EnGenius WAP/switch with Cisco ISE 2.1?
  • 7
Why is Wireless WAN important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Wireless WAN

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Ubiquiti Wireless vs Cisco Wireless WAN Logo
Ubiquiti Wireless vs Cisco Wireless WAN
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Cisco Wireless WAN Logo
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Cisco Wireless WAN
Fortinet FortiExtender vs Cisco Wireless WAN Logo
Fortinet FortiExtender vs Cisco Wireless WAN
See all alternatives
 
Cisco Wireless WAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.0Cisco Wireless WAN offers reliable long-term solutions with features like AI capabilities and easy WAN handoff, although encryption in WLAN needs improvement. Despite higher costs, Cisco provides a better overall solution, ensuring strong ROI for most users.
Network Administrator at frieslandcampina4.0No summary available
Manager IT Infrastructure & Helpdesk at LCI Pakistan3.5I've used Cisco Wireless WAN for four years in an all-Cisco environment. It's easy to set up, stable, and scalable, but sometimes has coverage issues. Despite initial high prices, it offers good value and support overall.
Network Engineer at KOREAN AIR3.5We have been using Cisco Wireless WAN for a decade, appreciating its scalability, but we're transitioning to Xtream. Cisco's complex structure, higher cost, and issues with roaming prompted the switch, despite experiencing a 20% time saving with Cisco.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees4.5I am an SE engineer engaging with customers across various industries. Cisco Wireless WAN, with Meraki's cloud-based accessibility, facilitates remote troubleshooting and updates. While trusted, it's more expensive than FortiNet due to Cisco's tiered licensing.
Senior Manager Tech Support at Convergent Wireless Communications4.5I primarily use Cisco Wireless WAN in industries like medical, hospitality, and education due to its excellent coverage and security. Although pricing could improve, there's a good ROI as customers stick with Cisco for future needs.
Network Manager at UHB4.0We primarily use Cisco Wireless WAN for corporate guest access in our hospital, as it is crucial for clinical users. The solution is reliable, but the licensing model is complicated, and we often pay for features we do not use.
CASH MANAGEMENT PROPEMI at bgr4.0We use Cisco Wireless WAN on campus, valuing its easy deployment via Meraki cloud, yet face challenges with traffic visibility after integrating with Cisco SD-WAN and Umbrella, affecting troubleshooting. A good return on investment is possible with proper configurations.