Azure Site Recovery Reviews

Azure Site Recovery provides substantial benefits including process simplification and reliability, serving as a cost-effective alternative to building a second data center. It significantly reduces the time needed for virtual machine backup and restoration, offering a 30 percent time-saving advantage compared to Veeam. Its automation capabilities lead to resource efficiency. Though pricier than some options, it delivers enough service quality to justify expenses. Some companies view it more as a safety feature without measured financial returns.

Enterprise users describe Azure Site Recovery pricing as variable and dependent on factors like storage and network traffic. While some find it affordable and cost-effective, others see it as somewhat expensive, noting occasional billing complexities. The consumption-based licensing offers flexibility, though estimation may be challenging. Monthly costs can fluctuate, but typical expenses include a starting point around $225 for specific setups. Users appreciate the reasonable pricing compared to other solutions, though they express a desire for simplification and potential cost reductions.

• "The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
• "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
• "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

Users primarily utilize Azure Site Recovery for disaster recovery and business continuity. They back up data, replicate virtual machines, and migrate servers to Azure, ensuring infrastructure remains operational in case of failures. It's often used by insurance, healthcare, and enterprise sectors. Organizations emphasize maintaining uptime by conducting regular drills and creating backup plans. They integrate Azure Site Recovery with existing infrastructures for data recovery and compliance, supporting cross-region recovery and ensuring minimal downtime.

Feedback on Azure Site Recovery's customer service and support varies. Some users report positive experiences, praising quick, efficient assistance, and knowledgeable staff. Others express dissatisfaction with slow response times, and emphasize that communication could be challenging. Partners often provide effective assistance, sometimes deemed better than direct Microsoft support. Ratings range from five to nine, indicating mixed satisfaction. Premium support experiences fewer issues, with partners being valuable in supplementing or replacing Microsoft's assistance when necessary.

Azure Site Recovery's initial setup is generally straightforward, although complexity can depend on infrastructure and data size. Larger environments may require skilled teams for efficient deployment. Installation may take as little as a few hours, but synchronization can extend this period. Documentation and Microsoft support might be lacking, so experienced partners or team members are recommended. Organizations have noted that familiarity with cloud services aids in smoother deployment and management.

Azure Site Recovery is known for its scalability, allowing various users to expand their server capacity as needed. Many users find its scalability effective, supporting both small businesses and larger enterprises. Most users rate its scalability between seven and nine out of ten, indicating satisfaction with scaling capabilities. Some highlight that execution should be well-managed to ensure consistent performance. While generally suitable for diverse use cases, a few see room for improvement in certain areas.

Azure Site Recovery is generally stable, with users rating its stability between seven to ten out of ten. Many have conducted multiple tests indicating consistently high stability. Most users find Azure Site Recovery works without issues, although a few have encountered occasional challenges. Its performance does fluctuate based on different conditions, and some users note difficulties when integrating with existing technologies. Despite isolated incidents, Azure Site Recovery often receives positive feedback for its reliability.