Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 13

What needs improvement with Windows Server?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Windows Server.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

PeerSpot user
38 Answers
IT manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
14 May 21

It could be more secure. We don't like it because if you compare it to Linux, Linux is better.

Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
14 May 21

Sometimes we face some overload on servers. You need to request one of the IT to assist as there is no way that you can do a remote session on it. They need to intervene directly on the server. It has to be done manually. We also can't intervene ourselves as there is no way to log in remotely to the servers. That's why IT needs to get involved. It's a pain point for us as all you can really do is wait. In a future release, it would be helpful if there were more tools to help us do some performance testing. The last time we needed to look for tools online and choose some third-party tools to analyze how the application is performing. If they could instead provide us with pre-installed tools, that would be better. There are some but they don't really give you the information that we are looking for.

IT Production Engineer at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
13 May 21

We had some complaints about the initial setup.

Nadeem Abdulla - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Manager - IT Infrastructure at Taghleef Industries SpA
Real User
Top 5
13 April 21

The stability could be improved. The scalability could also be improved.

IT Infra Head at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
31 March 21

A lot of attacks are monitored however, there are a lot of things coming into it. This is why we need to provide more security with respect to the Linux platform. There's more security on Windows and not enough on Linux. The licensing for the solution is expensive.

HimanshuTejwani - PeerSpot reviewer
System Administrator and DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
11 February 21

When it comes to the performance of this solution others are slightly better such as Linux. This solution promotes its services only, in some of the integrations, it does not support external ones.

Learn what your peers think about Windows Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2022.
632,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior IT Manager at a pharma/biotech company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
05 February 21

The solution could have better security features. The pricing is a bit high. Linux has better pricing. They should try to make their product more competitively priced.

ICT Manager at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
03 February 21

The initial setup could be easier. Right now, it's more difficult than it needs to be. The solution is rather expensive and could be more affordable.

Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
03 February 21

The stability is okay, however, it could be better. It's an area that they could improve on if they wanted to.

Vice President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Top 10
01 February 21

The solution could be cheaper.

Technical and Project Manager Industrial Directorate EES CLEMESSY at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
28 January 21

The initial setup could be simplified.

Network Engineer at IRPC PCL
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
28 January 21

It could be more compatible with other platforms. The compatibility and the ease of use are areas that I would like to see improved.

Maan Othman - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior System Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
23 January 21

It would help if Microsoft made it lighter to run on the servers and made troubleshooting much easier. I have to deal with unexpected errors and faults that happen in Windows. It also crashes. When it's a big environment, especially in an industrialized environment, we see unexpected errors. They create instability, or unexpected errors happen in the infrastructure. You need to restart the server or restart the services. You don't know the root cause of these errors.

Kaan Çelik - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Analytics and Business Intelligence Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
10 January 21

The solution is easy to use mostly but some features can be hard to understand for customers.

Executive Personal Assistant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
08 January 21

There are lots of improvements that can be brought by Microsoft, although for us Windows Server works mostly as expected. For how we're using Windows Server, security is a top priority, so when talking security, it can always be improved upon, no matter what. Then there's the performance side, which is not bad, but we are currently looking to increase capacity and we have found that we need to enhance the hardware to get the performance we are looking for. Because of this, we are going to be refreshing the hardware and moving to new infrastructure in the next few weeks.

Solution Director at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
22 December 20

The license model needs improvement. It would be better if the license had a longer lifetime. This may be a feature that is already in place, but I like to see a monitoring feature for the desktop.

Cloud Service Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
18 December 20

The patching could be better within the solution. There are many updates, however, if you compare it with other parts of Windows, the patching has a different management structure. The scalability could be improved a bit.

Shankar HN - PeerSpot reviewer
IT strategist at Convergent Wireless Communications
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
07 December 20

It could be more stable. Windows has certain problems that Unix platforms don't have. It requires more administrative effort as compared to Unix. I don't know why Microsoft has not changed that. It generates a lot of trash data, so slowly and steadily, you find more and more space being utilized. There is some kind of administrative load, which doesn't happen with Unix.

Operations Director / Business Critical Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
01 December 20

I find ethernet configuration and implementation difficult. I would also like to see more reliable updates.

hugodpereira - PeerSpot reviewer
Computer engineering student at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
17 November 20

Configuring a group policy has shown to be not very straightforward. For example, one of our assignments was to create a GPO that should block any user of opening and/or downloading an MP3/WAV file, and the same for video files. It was very confusing to find a solution that would do just that, we had to test different approches, or ven combining policies to achieve something that resambles what was asked to do. The default template in the File Server Resouce Manager isn't enough.

System Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
21 October 20

The reporting, event logging, and event management functionalities need to be improved. Windows Server needs more applications from the monitoring and backup perspective. These are not incorporated yet. In previous versions, the backup software was available, but not now.

Deputy IT Manager at ICAPP (Americana Group)
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
15 October 20

I would like to see better integration with other operating systems. For example, when I migrate from services from Linux or Unix to Windows Server, it's hard to do. I expect it to be easier.

organizator informatike at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
11 October 20

Windows Platforms become rather complicated. We started with the Windows Platform because they simplified it, but now, it has become quite complicated. The administration has become quite heavy and also the specialization. We are a rather small factory, not a big system. We are small with a thousand employees, and we need a simplified environment. In the next release, I would like to see the administration simplified.

Technical Director at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
11 October 20

Windows Server could be more secure.

Principal Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Top 10
04 October 20

In terms of support, it's pretty complicated when you have to study the documentation. It would definitely be helpful if the documentation could be more straightforward.

IT Infrastructure Engineer at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
29 September 20

I would like to see the security features improved in the future.

IT Engineer at a printing company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
29 September 20

The user interface could be simplified. Sometimes I feel like there are too many things going on at once. It should be easier to navigate and find the functions that I am trying to implement.

Technical Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
27 September 20

The price should be reduced.

Noor Parkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. System and Storage Administrator at a government with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
27 September 20

The technical updates need to be improved upon. How they are delivered isn't ideal. Technical support in and of itself needs to be better. The experience we have isn't very good. It's hard to get timely answers to our questions. The system needs to offer better integration capabilities. The solution's availability could be better in future releases.

ICT System Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
13 September 20

Compared to Linux, Windows requires a lot of restarts. If you get a CU update every month, you have to restart. Linux is better in that regard. Sometimes the PowerShell has an overly complicated syntax. I'd like to see some more features in the Windows administration kit - the WAC. It's this new product you got on the server and if you have a website you can manage your entire machine. It's a pretty good product, but it's still lacking some features like reporting because it's always a problem to have a dashboard for all your Windows machines, because Microsoft wants you to buy SCCM and all their monitoring services. The WAC is pretty nice but it still lacks some features. It would be great if they would develop it further.

IT Infrastructure Manager at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
27 August 20

They can simplify the utilization and control of the system when you have a lot of setups. They provided something called Windows Center or Control Center in version 2019. It's a free tool that comes with the Windows Server. You can install it on your desktop and use it. This tool simplifies the control and monitoring of all servers. If I have 200 servers, I don't need to log in to each one to configure it. I can manage them from this tool. However, this tool needs quite a lot of improvements. It's difficult to use, and they need to improve it.

Kevin Honde - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Solution Architect at Econet Wireless Zimbabwe
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
26 August 20

Better integration with more platforms would be useful.

Senior IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
11 August 20

Right now what is needed on the server-side is an easier release process. Every year or every third year they are releasing a newer version and it could go smoother. The solution lacks a few features here and there. Although they've done a good job updating security, there's more to be done, and they should continue improving this aspect of the product.

QusaiMuhammad - PeerSpot reviewer
Volunteer - IT Department at SARC
Real User
05 August 20

The command-line interface should be improved. Using the command line is less-resource intensive so we use it sometimes. The additional RAM and CPU usage needed by the GUI is something that we were not used to after using Linux. When I switched to the command line, I found it more difficult than Linux.

System Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
23 July 20

The pricing aspect of the solution needs improvement. It could be lowered. Over time, the pricing itself has fluctuated, and now, especially pricing around mobile aspects of the solution really seems to be driving everything up. They also need to work on the license model for virtualization. The solution could offer higher availability. Users would benefit if the solution offered better management features.

Nehad Elkordi - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Rashideen Egypt For Trade
Real User
12 July 20

The security should be improved, specifically from port security & Allowed protocols,The improvement should retire all marked ports & protocols as a security breach to enhance platform risks & stability . Overall, from a security perspective, Microsoft needs to improve. The Server platform GUI seems to take up a lot of resources unnecessarily.

03 July 19

It would be great to have support for direct USB recognition for the virtual machines. This will allow us to easily move files from a USB drive connected to our host to one of our VM's without having to mount and share a drive trough the network to move the files.

reviewer1099098 - PeerSpot reviewer
User with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
21 May 19

One area that needs improvement is the management console. It seems very easy to use but it is not as powerful as those of other vendors, such as VMware. Their solution allows for operation in a more granular and simpler way. For example, there is a wizard to migrate a VM from one node to another, or from one datastore to another.

Related Questions
User at 香港理工大學
Sep 16, 2022
Hi community,  I am currently looking for an alternative product for SUSE Linux Enterprise Servers. Which OS solution would you recommend and why? Thank you for your help.
Nurit Sherman - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Operations Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 03, 2018
One of the most popular comparisons on IT Central Station is Oracle Linux vs RHEL. One user says about Oracle Linux, "Compared to RHEL, it is much easier to install, configure, and run Oracle Database and Grid Infrastructure." According to another user, "Red Hat has improved the mission critical environments running Oracle databases" Which of these two solutions would you recommend and why? ...
2 out of 11 answers
PeerSpot user
Unix Engineer at Global Engineering team at Hewlett Packard Enterprise
27 March 18
RHEL is my suggested choice. You can use ASM and cluster add-on to enhance the solution. Depending on the provided design.
PeerSpot user
Główny Specjalista ds. IT at Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Olsztynie
27 March 18
I recommend Oracle Linux. Due to the ease of installation and clustering.
Related Solutions
Download Free Report
Download our free Windows Server Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2022.
632,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.