The pricing sits at a mid-level range, around five or six. There are cheaper and more expensive tools available, but the price features parity is good.
Sr. Global Strategic Planning Manager at a agriculture with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Jun 10, 2024
The pricing for Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is reasonable. One notable aspect is Microsoft's expertise in pricing strategies. Microsoft charges differently for users and devices, which can complicate purchasing decisions. Meraki, on the other hand, simplifies this by charging per device rather than per user. This difference becomes significant in our organization, where many users have multiple devices. In Microsoft's environment, we only pay for each user once, whereas, with Meraki, we pay for each device separately. Despite this, Meraki tends to be more cost-effective overall. In our case, the savings amounted to around four hundred dollars, which is noticeable given our total solution costs of twenty-five to thirty-five thousand dollars. If Meraki adjusts its licensing to accommodate users with multiple devices, it could further enhance its attractiveness as a solution.
Pricing is moderate, for example, between the MS48 and the MX85. We paid approximately thirty thousand dollars for licenses, filtering, IPS, and other features, including a discount.
Senior Manager-Sales at INFRASCOM SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
Real User
Top 5
Apr 15, 2024
The price depends on the usage. If someone has a niche enterprise clientele, they will need more features and security in their network. Price will not be their primary concern.
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
Chief Technology Officer at Tasman Logistics Services
Real User
Oct 2, 2023
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is not the cheapest option, but considering it is an enterprise-grade solution, it offers good value for its price. It is competitive and ranks among the better-priced choices for such solutions. Licenses are typically paid on a monthly basis but are part of a longer contract period, often ranging from three to five years, depending on the equipment in use. With Cisco Meraki, there might be additional fees for higher levels of support, but standard support is usually covered as long as you maintain your license agreements. If you stop paying your licenses, the devices will eventually stop functioning, so it is essential to keep your subscriptions up to date for continued functionality.
Engineering Manager at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Jul 7, 2022
I don’t have any details regarding the licensing or costs involved. It’s my understanding that, as partners, we have special licenses. System Manager is free for us. We're paying for the licenses for the switches and MX and everything else.
Network Engineer at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
Reseller
May 8, 2022
My customers at times have issues with the price of the solution. It is expensive, but overall it is worth it. The licensing model cost is based on how many devices you require.
Cisco is too expensive. Cisco is the host for the enterprise system, and I'm still using Cisco for switches. Some switches cost $2,000 to $4,000. I've been using Cisco for 10 to 15 years, and it has never failed. I'm happy with Cisco, but the price is too high. The total cost for my site can get up to $15,000. It's not too hard to convince management at that price, but if it goes over $20,000, that's a tough sell.
The setup cost can be expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Licensing can be done on a monthly basis. A lot of clients prefer to use the cloud-based option.
Every user is unique. Every device, a bit different. Systems Manager keeps the network in the loop about constantly changing devices, automatically tracking device posture and adjusting security policies to match.
The pricing sits at a mid-level range, around five or six. There are cheaper and more expensive tools available, but the price features parity is good.
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is an expensive solution.
The pricing for Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is reasonable. One notable aspect is Microsoft's expertise in pricing strategies. Microsoft charges differently for users and devices, which can complicate purchasing decisions. Meraki, on the other hand, simplifies this by charging per device rather than per user. This difference becomes significant in our organization, where many users have multiple devices. In Microsoft's environment, we only pay for each user once, whereas, with Meraki, we pay for each device separately. Despite this, Meraki tends to be more cost-effective overall. In our case, the savings amounted to around four hundred dollars, which is noticeable given our total solution costs of twenty-five to thirty-five thousand dollars. If Meraki adjusts its licensing to accommodate users with multiple devices, it could further enhance its attractiveness as a solution.
Pricing is moderate, for example, between the MS48 and the MX85. We paid approximately thirty thousand dollars for licenses, filtering, IPS, and other features, including a discount.
The price depends on the usage. If someone has a niche enterprise clientele, they will need more features and security in their network. Price will not be their primary concern.
It is on the expensive side.
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is not the cheapest option, but considering it is an enterprise-grade solution, it offers good value for its price. It is competitive and ranks among the better-priced choices for such solutions. Licenses are typically paid on a monthly basis but are part of a longer contract period, often ranging from three to five years, depending on the equipment in use. With Cisco Meraki, there might be additional fees for higher levels of support, but standard support is usually covered as long as you maintain your license agreements. If you stop paying your licenses, the devices will eventually stop functioning, so it is essential to keep your subscriptions up to date for continued functionality.
The storage is affordable and the system has some price-related issues. Therefore, keeping the price in mind, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
We have a standard license, but I do not have details about the cost.
I don’t have any details regarding the licensing or costs involved. It’s my understanding that, as partners, we have special licenses. System Manager is free for us. We're paying for the licenses for the switches and MX and everything else.
My customers at times have issues with the price of the solution. It is expensive, but overall it is worth it. The licensing model cost is based on how many devices you require.
Meraki's pricing is a little bit more expensive as compared to other vendors.
Cisco is too expensive. Cisco is the host for the enterprise system, and I'm still using Cisco for switches. Some switches cost $2,000 to $4,000. I've been using Cisco for 10 to 15 years, and it has never failed. I'm happy with Cisco, but the price is too high. The total cost for my site can get up to $15,000. It's not too hard to convince management at that price, but if it goes over $20,000, that's a tough sell.
The price could be better.
This product is reasonably priced.
The setup cost can be expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Licensing can be done on a monthly basis. A lot of clients prefer to use the cloud-based option.
We're using a free version of the solution. But if we exceed the limit the pricing was in line with other MDM solutions.
It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere. It's excellent, actually, for the products and what they can handle.
The price is high for the market.