Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Melissa Data Quality OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Melissa Data Quality is #2 ranked solution in top Data Scrubbing Software and #6 ranked solution in top Data Quality tools. PeerSpot users give Melissa Data Quality an average rating of 9.0 out of 10. Melissa Data Quality is most commonly compared to Informatica Address Verification: Melissa Data Quality vs Informatica Address Verification. Melissa Data Quality is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 61% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 19% of all views.
Buyer's Guide

Download the Data Quality Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: September 2022

What is Melissa Data Quality?

Data Quality Components for SSIS

This suite of data transformations for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) delivers the full spectrum of data quality including data profiling, data verification, data enrichment and data matching. With an intuitive interface and drag/drop capabilities, this powerful toolkit makes it easy to unify data into a single version of the truth for Master Data Management (MDM) success.

Melissa Data Quality Customers

Boeing Co., FedEx, Ford Motor Co, Hewlett Packard, Meade-Johnson, Microsoft, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, SAAB Cars USA, Sony, Walt Disney, Weight Watchers, and Intel.

Melissa Data Quality Video

Melissa Data Quality Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Melissa Data Quality pricing:
"This vendor has no equal in pricing for equivalent functionality."

Melissa Data Quality Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
GaryM - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Architect at World Vision
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing
Pros and Cons
  • "The high value in this tool is its relatively low cost, ease of use, tight integration with SSIS, superior performance (compared to competitors), and attribute-level advanced survivor-ship logic."
  • "The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation however all SSIS components are resizable so that isn't true. This is just an annoyance but needless."

What is our primary use case?

We use this tool for B2B and B2C customer de-duplication/matching, generating a golden version of our customers and for householding. 

How has it helped my organization?

We use Melissa Data Matchup for SSIS to de-duplicate our customer data on a daily basis so that we were able to reduce marketing costs and increase the quality of communication with customers.

It replaced a weekly primitive custom de-duplication (record level) matching process.

Its survivor-ship logic handles very complex column-level rules efficiently providing us with a first-time for a single version of truth for our customer data. It's inherent intelligence into name and address parsing provides a very accurate exact match with no false positives and no unexpected false negatives. We are continually impressed by its sophistication and ease of use. The tool does not requires a middle tier or specialized staff like every other tool on the market.

What is most valuable?

The high value in this tool is its relatively low cost, ease of use, tight integration with SSIS, superior performance (compared to competitors), and attribute-level advanced survivor-ship logic. There's no separate server needed and no separate application to maintain.

This vendor offers a large variety of components from on-prem to cloud SaaS as well as hybrid of cloud and on-prem. This review is specific to the "MatchUp for SSIS" component.

For us, this tool had very high value due to the fact that we didn't have to become experts in some overly complicated DQ tool. And because it is fully integrated with our EDW ETL rather than having to originate and integrate an external application.

We are using it for daily 1) direct matching, 2) column-level survivor-ship and 3) mail house-holding. We started with B2C customers and later added B2B customers. The tool supports unique matching specific to organization names and individual names (as well as a variety of other specialized types of data values) and works well in both cases. For example it can pull out nicknames and match on those.

One of the business and operational benefits for us is feeding the end result to Adobe Campaign for marketing automation. But the primary output is simply creating and managing an analytical golden record for our customer data. This has provided a very effective, holistic, maintenance-free, and extremely cost effective solution for us.

The initial POC was up and running in just a few days with no training needed. The plug-in into our ETL tool was seamless and fully integrated into our existing processes. Most of our effort was due to the need to identify customer survivor-ship requirements and validation. Any needed adjustment changes could be done very quickly allowing us to focus on business requirements instead of implementing technology.

What needs improvement?

- Licensing could be greatly simplified. As soon as a license expires (which is specific to each server) the product stops functioning without prior notice and requires a new license by contacting the vendor. To update the license key you have to actually go into an SSIS dataflow and create an SSIS package on each server to update the license.   

- The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation but that isn't true since all SSIS components are resizable. This is just an annoyance but needless impact on productivity when developing new data flows.

- The tool needs to provide for incremental matching using the MatchUp for SSIS tool (they provide this for other solutions such as standalone tool and MatchUp web service). We had to code our own incremental logic to work around this.

- Tool needs ability to sort mapped columns in the GUI when using advanced survivorship (only allowed when not using column-level survivorship).

- It should provide an option for a procedural language (such as C# or VB) for survivor-ship expressions rather than relying on SSIS expression language.

- It should provide a more sophisticated ability to concatenate groups of data fields into common blocks of data for advanced survivor-ship prioritization (we do most of this in SQL prior to feeding the data to the tool).

- It should provide the ability to only do survivor-ship with no matching (matching is currently required when running data through the tool).

- Tool should provide a component similar to BDD to enable the ability to split into multiple thread matches based on data partitions for matching and survivor-ship rather than requiring custom coding a parallel capable solution.  We broke down customer data by first letter of last name into ranges of last names so we could run parallel data flows.

- Documentation needs to be provided that is specific to MatchUp for SSIS.  Most of their wiki pages were written for the web service API MatchUp Object rather than the SSIS component.

- They need to update their wiki site documentation as much of it is not kept current. Its also very very basic offering very little in terms of guidelines. For example, the tool is single-threaded so getting great performance requires running multiple parallel data flows or BDD in a data flow which you can figure out on your own but many SSIS practitioners aren't familiar with those techniques.

- The tool can hang or crash on rare occasions for unknown reason. Restarting the package resolves the problem. I suspect they have something to do with running on VM (vendor doesn't recommend running on VM) but have no evidence to support it.  When it crashes it creates dump file with just vague message saying the executable stopped running.

Buyer's Guide
Data Quality
September 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Melissa, Informatica, Experian and others in Data Quality. Updated: September 2022.
635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this product for over 7 years.  

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No as long as you don't try to match on null last names or lots of duplicate (exact match) records or try to run it in the default 64 bit mode of SSIS (issue here is only with new versions).

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We can run 9 million customer record exact matches in 10 minutes using 5 partitions/parallel dataflows. Survivorship takes another 50 minutes. I'm sure you could run faster with dedicated hardware and running more parallel dataflows. The tool starts to exponentially slow down once you pass about 2 million customers in a single dataflow so its best to keep it at or under that number although mileage will vary depending on the complexity of your matching.  Its unfortunate that the vendor hasn't built in parallelism which would both eliminate the need to do this yourself.  They should be able to auto-scale it based on # of CPU's your running.

Even with that limitation this tool is magnitudes faster than the last matching tool I used and it wasn't a simple plug-in to an ETL tool. I recently heard of a competing tool that takes longer to match just a few thousand customers than this tool takes to run millions of them.


We probably run higher volumes than many organizations. For B2B and daily matching you could probably process a delta in a matter of a few minutes with this tool.  

Note:  I suspect an essential ingredient when considering scalability is whether you're calling a web service for matching or just on-prem. Their SSIS component is only on-prem but they offer a web service as well which we have not tested.

Combining survivorship and matching in the same data flow slows performance. We got much better performance by running in two separate dataflows - the first for just matching and then another for just survivorship (re-using the previous grouping numbers in the first match) to make it perform to our requirements.

How are customer service and support?

Customer Service:

Fairly typical vendor support. They are immediately attentive to problems and provide email notifications of software versions. The main technical contact we work with has been there for the last decade which is very refreshing!

Technical Support:

They regularly release new versions of the product with bug fixes and enhancements although just the matchup tool itself has changed very little in the past 5 years. 

However unless you can interact directly with the development team problems may not get resolved in a timely manner. I have usually been left coming up with my own solution in the time I was waiting for their support to provide answers from their support team.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used Datamentors and SAS Dataflux in the past with good success although I would easily take this product over those products for just matching/survivorship purposes. We had tested Oracle's cloud-based Fusion product which wasn't actually a functioning product at the time. The MelissaData tool is light-years ahead of Datamentors, far easier to use and the price can't be compared. The SAS tool was very expensive.  All other matching tools require separate middle tier application verses this product which is just a plug-in to SSIS.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup on the first install was VERY easy. Propagating the matching rules to the next server was easy IF you know which file to copy which isn't well documented. The tool is extremely easy to use when you know just a few little things which aren't documented. Their development staff were very helpful in providing simple tips on how to set it up.

What about the implementation team?

This was in-house implementation. The vendor was very responsive in answering questions.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This vendor has no equal in pricing for equivalent functionality. First no one else offers this level of integration with SSIS. Second other vendors with equal functionality all cost many times the cost of this tool. Third it doesn't require a separate server or large learning curve of new software. Fourth, this is one of the "go to" vendors for matching purposes as some master data and data quality tools are actually calling MelissaData Matchup object in the backend then charging you a lot for their pretty GUI to do this for you.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated Microsoft's DQS which could not scale over 100,000 customer records. DQS actually supported calling MelissaData Matchup in the old Microsoft Marketplace (no longer available) to use it's more sophisticated matching but it was a moot point if DQS can't handle the volume.  

What other advice do I have?

This tool is a dream compared to my previous experience with batch matching/de-duplication tools. And the pricing is incredible given its functionality and simplicity. High value and very lost cost. If you're an SSIS shop (they support other ETL tools also however) and you need to de-duplicate, household and/or do column-level survivorship then this tool can't be beat.

I highly advise running parallel threads by splitting your dataflow into multiple paths.  This allow parallel matching and increaes throuput significantly.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user

I am new to using Melissa MatchUp with SSIS.  I just inherited a package that uses it to household sales with leads.  Seems to be very very slow.  The package takes about 10 hours to run on average. There are about 5 million sales records and 4 million lead records that get ran through 10 custom rules.  The rules are ran in sequence, which I think might be the issue.  How can I get a better understanding of how to use this better.  And thank you for the review, it is very helpful.

GaryM - PeerSpot reviewer
GaryMData Architect at World Vision
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

@Jim Youmans There's a lot of factors involved so would have to see how your implementation to give specific advice.  We run similar householding volume in 15 to 30 minutes.  The important thing is to understand the principles involved with the tool and then determine what its violating.  Principle #1:  Only run incremental changes.  No need to household customers that aren't new or haven't changed.  That's just doing work with no benefit.  That applies to any data movement regardless of technology you're using.  Lots of people match/household everything everytime.  Wrong wrong wrong. Principle #2:  Matchup only uses single proc per dataflow.  To utilize > 1 cpu you have to run multiple parallel dataflows each with their own matching.  What you can do is break your customers/leads into say 4 or 5 groups based on the first letter of their last name and run each of those in parallel (assuming you have that many available cpus).  That alone will divide your runtime. For example if you run 4 groups it'll run 4x as fast. Principle #3:  Don't combine rules that are completely different.  Matchup has to of course sort the data in the order of the fields in the rules.  If those sorts are radically different without shared fields at the top you end up with radically different sorts.  For example, if you run businesses with different rules than individuals, run those as separate dataflows with their related rule sets only. Doesn't make sense to match people with businesses anyways.
Hope that helps.

PeerSpot user
See all 6 comments
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Data Quality Report and find out what your peers are saying about Melissa, Informatica, Experian, and more!
Updated: September 2022
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Data Quality Report and find out what your peers are saying about Melissa, Informatica, Experian, and more!