IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Junos Space Network Director OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Junos Space Network Director is #14 ranked solution in top Network Management Applications. PeerSpot users give Junos Space Network Director an average rating of 7.0 out of 10. Junos Space Network Director is most commonly compared to Cisco DNA Center: Junos Space Network Director vs Cisco DNA Center. Junos Space Network Director is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 68% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a comms service provider, accounting for 35% of all views.
Buyer's Guide

Download the Network Management Applications Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: July 2022

What is Junos Space Network Director?

Juniper Junos Space Network Director can support IT staff can manage their physical and virtual enterprise networks through a single pane of glass. Junos Space Network Director is a automated turnkey network management solution. Administrators can use it to visualize, analyze, and control their entire enterprise networks. In the data center, your IT staff can use the tool to manage and synchronize physical and virtual environments. In the campus, Network Director automates routine management tasks such as network provisioning and troubleshooting, dramatically improving operational efficiency and reliability. Network Director also integrates with VMware vCenter and vRealize Operations (vROps). The management tool offers sophisticated analytics for high-performance data centers, while open RESTful APIs support service orchestration integration with third-party platforms.

Junos Space Network Director Customers

St. Catherine's University, OneNet, University of New Haven, Frederick County Public Schools (Maryland), America's Test Kitchen

Junos Space Network Director Video

Archived Junos Space Network Director Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Teuku Maiyasya - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at PT Bali Towerindo Sentra, Tbk
Real User
Top 5
Stable with good performance, and the technical support is better than others
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the technical support, as it is better than others."
  • "I would like to them include network real-time performance and come up with a dashboard report."

What is our primary use case?

We are internet service providers and when our clients subscribe to our services, we provide the features.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the technical support, as it is better than others.

What needs improvement?

I would like to them include network real-time performance and come up with a dashboard report. That is something that I would love to have.

For how long have I used the solution?

We started using this solution two or three years ago.

Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: July 2022.
620,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is stable and the performance is very good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is scalable if referring to our core network equipment. In terms of the CPE, customer premises, it works with 12 ports or sometimes 24 ports.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is very helpful. Any time we have a problem, they support us.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we were using Nokia and Huawei equipment. They are similar in terms of equipment, but the support is better with Juniper. Also, the packaging is complicated. They separate the support and other things, so it's a bit difficult because when we want support, we have to purchase that package or model. Juniper doesn't break it down that way and the support is included.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. It's not complex.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We would like the price to be reduced.

What other advice do I have?

We are network providers for our clients.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user