"Veeam has a "next, next, finish" installer, and the overall deployment is straightforward. The deployment is easy because Veeam is compatible with all our VMware services and VMs. Veeam Backup and Veeam ONE are integrated into vCenter or vSphere site deployments, so we don't need to deploy each server one by one."
"It's simple to use."
"Veeam Agent for Linux's most valuable feature is the compatibility with virtual machines, such as VMware."
"The initial setup and deployment are easy. It's straightforward."
"I like the incremental backups and their failover."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to pick up individual files."
"The most valuable feature of the Veritas NetBackup Appliance is the virtual machine backups."
"The most valuable feature involves VMware Instant Recovery, which allows one to do restoration within seconds."
"NetBackup Appliance's most valuable feature is the duplication encryption standard feature."
"It has a lot of very good features. The virtual tape library (VTL) feature is most valuable. Overall, it is easy to use."
"It has been our go-to product for backup."
"The initial setup gets easier the more you do it."
"This is a good backup interconversion solution because all the masters and the targets backups are on the same system. It is easy to administrate for a single point of access for clients."
"The policy-based backup feature is very helpful."
"The integration needs improvement."
"There isn't much to improve. They just need to follow the trend or the development of other Linux products. Follow in terms of making the product compatible with new versions of Linux. They just need to include as many versions for Linux as possible."
"They could be more customer-friendly."
"The price of Veeam Agent for Linux could be reduced."
"The solution is pretty stable right now, however, we believe that the solution could be made to be even more stable."
"The reporting feature can be improved."
"Veritas NetBackup Appliance can improve by having a more direct connection to the cloud. It should have the technology to be able to directly communicate with the cloud."
"It could be better integrated with other platforms."
"It would be a better solution if we were able to make more reports in regards to the backup system."
"The configuration can sometimes be tricky during implementation."
"The price needs to be improved because it is really expensive."
"Veritas NetBackup would benefit from better explained error codes."
"The hybrid model is not that efficient if we want to off-site data; it takes a lot of time to upload the data on a regular basis."
Veeam Agent for Linux is ranked 24th in Backup and Recovery Software with 6 reviews while Veritas NetBackup Appliance is ranked 19th in Backup and Recovery Software with 18 reviews. Veeam Agent for Linux is rated 8.0, while Veritas NetBackup Appliance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Linux writes "Easy to deploy and user-friendly with good technical support and ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup Appliance writes "Combines two solutions for use of our backup environment". Veeam Agent for Linux is most compared with Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, IBM Spectrum Protect and Microsoft DPM, whereas Veritas NetBackup Appliance is most compared with DD Boost, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), HPE StoreOnce, Veritas NetBackup and ExaGrid EX Series. See our Veeam Agent for Linux vs. Veritas NetBackup Appliance report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery Software vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
