Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (20th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
32nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Unique Categories:
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
1.6%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Mar 15, 2023
Reliable with excellent pricing and good reliability
We primarily use the solution as a basic antivirus. It's for protection. We centralize the management of 50 computers.  The solution offers us more security and less chance of getting a virus. So far, we have had no viruses.  So far, the experience has been positive.  The pricing is good. It is…
Preeti  Bhave - PeerSpot reviewer
May 17, 2023
Includes an encrypted drive that stores a key for accessing the encrypted data, but the monthly reporting feature can be improved
We use WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response to manage the Windows endpoints. We also have some Linux machines, but the majority are Windows endpoints. We also have some servers which WithSecure manages Regarding the security posture, we were quite weak in endpoint security, but…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."
"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."
"The performance is good."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
"Provides protection against threats."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating."
"It offers good scalability."
"I use the solution to protect our infrastructure. The tool has special frames for banking. There is an additional secure filter for banking-related pages. It protects me from viruses, malware, and attacks."
"The product is stable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"WithSecure includes an encrypted drive that stores a key for accessing the encrypted data."
"The only issue that we have today is with false positives. We have too many false positives with the solution."
 

Cons

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."
"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."
"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."
"Its automated functionality could be better."
"The tool’s mobile version needs to be improved."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is scalable. My company has 800-1000 customers."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The monthly reporting feature of WithSecure can be improved."
"The website rules are too complicated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response's licensing costs are yearly."
"I rate WithSecure a four out of ten because it's quite economical."
"The solution's price is moderate."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. Its pricing is competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
22%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Government
12%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, F-Secure Rapid Detection and Response, F-Secure RDR
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Blackfin
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.