Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response comparison

Trellix and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Trellix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5, while WithSecure is ranked #48 with an average rating of 7.7. Trellix holds a 2.1% mindshare in EDR, compared to WithSecure’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews
  • 3,273 Views
  • 2,549 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 6 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response reviews
  • 722 Views
  • 527 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Security and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offer advanced endpoint protection solutions. Users are more satisfied with WithSecure Elements due to its comprehensive features and high performance, justifying its higher cost compared to Trellix ENS.

Features: Trellix ENS provides strong malware protection, robust policy management, and effective endpoint performance monitoring. WithSecure Elements includes advanced threat detection algorithms, automated response capabilities, and intelligent and adaptive security features.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ENS can improve in real-time protection, incident response efficiency, and user interface design. WithSecure Elements needs better integration capabilities, more intuitive configuration options, and enhanced training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ENS has a straightforward installation process but mixed customer support experiences. WithSecure Elements, though slightly more complex to deploy, receives higher marks for responsive and effective customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ENS is more cost-effective initially, providing moderate ROI. WithSecure Elements requires a higher investment but delivers superior ROI over time due to its advanced features and proactive threat management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (26th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
48th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.
Read full review
Eckart Jensen - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an additional secure filter for banking-related pages and protects from viruses, malware, and attacks
The tool’s initial setup was straightforward. I would rate it a ten out of ten. However, for the setup of the mobile version, I would only rate it an eight out of ten. You will receive an invitation link and you get access as portal admin when you click on it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."
"Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."
"It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating."
"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros
"It is a scalable solution."
"WithSecure includes an encrypted drive that stores a key for accessing the encrypted data."
"I use the solution to protect our infrastructure. The tool has special frames for banking. There is an additional secure filter for banking-related pages. It protects me from viruses, malware, and attacks."
"The only issue that we have today is with false positives. We have too many false positives with the solution."
"The product is stable."
"It offers good scalability."
 

Cons

"A policy-editing console should be added."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
"Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection."
"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."
"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The monthly reporting feature of WithSecure can be improved."
"Its automated functionality could be better."
"The website rules are too complicated."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is scalable. My company has 800-1000 customers."
"The tool’s mobile version needs to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"The pricing is reasonable."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response's licensing costs are yearly."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. Its pricing is competitive."
"I rate WithSecure a four out of ten because it's quite economical."
"The solution's price is moderate."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
22%
Comms Service Provider
19%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
The product is stable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response's licensing costs are yearly.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response need to improve pricing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 20% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 16% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 14% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 9% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 7% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 50% of the time
Microsoft Defender XDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 16% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 14% of the time
Cynet vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Cynet vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiEDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 9% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
April 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
January 2025
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, F-Secure Rapid Detection and Response, F-Secure RDR
 

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response. 

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Detection and Response gives you instant visibility into your IT environment and security status from a single pane of glass. It keeps your business and data safe by detecting attacks fast and responding with expert guidance. And you can elevate the hardest cases to our elite cyber security specialists, so we always have your back.

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Blackfin
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
April 2025
Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.