

Zapier and Striim compete in automation and data integration. Users favor Striim for advanced features and real-time capabilities, while Zapier is preferred for pricing and usability.
Features: Zapier provides a user-friendly platform, extensive app integrations, and seamless workflow automation. Striim offers real-time data streaming, in-memory processing, and immediate data insights.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zapier offers an intuitive setup process and accessible customer support to simplify task automation. Striim requires more technical expertise for deployment but offers detailed documentation and responsive support for complex needs.
Pricing and ROI: Zapier provides flexible pricing plans, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses with a quick return on investment. Striim requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant ROI for enterprises through high-capacity data processing.
The incidents have disappeared completely since I have been using Striim.
Striim's continuous pipeline safely processes millions of daily transactions without data loss; my organization had millions of transactions every day and even in real-time, so it was quite good.
Since it is now one to two hours, I would say it has saved employee hours and time.
In a scenario where employing three resources for three months might cost approximately $18,000 to $20,000, Zapier provides substantial cost savings.
They are all knowledgeable about what they do.
When you contact them, they give you a response straight away and help you identify the issue and fix it.
The customer support has been excellent, and their engineers actually understand z/OS architecture and DB2 logs.
Their technical support is good; they respond promptly and are very helpful.
This can help if you need assistance, as you can communicate with the community and support system, and most issues are already resolved by AI.
The experience was positive with prompt responses from their team.
Our licensing was based on the number of cores, so even if we have a high number of events on any given day, our license cost would not go high.
I would describe the scalability of Striim as very good, as it adapts well.
Striim can handle the data volumes effectively, but it can struggle a little bit if the data volume is too high.
Zapier is suitable for small or simpler automation but not for complex ones.
Scaling it gets quite expensive, and while I cannot evaluate it purely from a technology perspective, compared to Workato, I would give Zapier a seven for scalability.
That problem has been completely resolved with Striim.
Striim was very stable.
In my experience, Striim is mostly stable.
In my current company, we had significant challenges with Zapier regarding maintenance, as Zaps were often broken, not necessarily due to Zapier, but due to changes in the input variables.
I believe if Striim could use some part of AWS secrets or its own secret mechanism to store the password, that would really save a lot of time so that I don't have to keep updating the password whenever there is any change.
They could improve the documentation by showing how to configure with different platforms.
I think Striim could be improved with better pricing and enhanced documentation.
The error message options in the dashboard should be improved. It should be user-friendly so that beginners or non-technical users can figure out the problems and solutions on their own.
You can build similar or dependent automations in one Zap, which helps with understanding the process without switching between different records.
Having flexibility in creating more complex automation would eliminate the need to transform data within the source or destination.
Licensing was a bit more expensive because Striim has to read from Oracle GoldenGate trail files and also integrate them.
My experience with the pricing, implementation cost, and licensing of Striim is that it is somewhat expensive.
It's very fair.
The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases.
The pricing of Zapier is slightly higher compared to other market automation tools such as Pabbly, Make.com, and N8N, which have good features but are priced lower than Zapier.
Striim is capable of absorbing a large number of transactions, and the difference between the two databases is always less than a second, which demonstrates efficiency.
There were significant improvements because once we enabled change data capture, the database was not going down at all.
It reduces manual intervention because it automatically syncs the data from the warehouse.
A webhook is what helps solve most of it because we can create all the different modules as a separate workflow in Zapier with their own custom webhook URL and then call them or chain them together to create a complex workflow solving a bigger use case problem.
They have approximately 7,000 connections.
The automation capabilities are impressive.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Zapier | 3.1% |
| Striim | 1.2% |
| Other | 95.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Striim offers a comprehensive platform for real-time data integration and streaming analytics, designed to streamline data processes for enterprise-level solutions.
Striim enables seamless migration and integration of data across cloud and on-premises environments, making it ideal for businesses looking to leverage real-time analytics. Its capabilities support continuous data flow, reducing latency and enhancing decision-making. Designed for scalable and secure data management, Striim facilitates effective data-driven strategies.
What are some key features of Striim?In industries like finance, Striim supports real-time fraud detection by providing uninterrupted data streaming between transaction systems. In healthcare, it enables rapid data processing for patient monitoring, improving service delivery. Manufacturing uses Striim to enhance supply chain visibility through real-time data analytics.
Zapier connects thousands of apps, enabling seamless automation without coding. It supports webhooks, multi-step tasks, and a wide array of integrations. Despite needing enhancements in Google Sheets capabilities, API limits, and UI, it remains a tool for boosting productivity across many sectors.
By linking tools such as Google Sheets, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, Zapier allows users to automate workflows without coding expertise. Its integrations serve logistics operations, CRM, and social media management. Users can process tracking exceptions and streamline operations with third-party software like QuickBooks, Zoho, and Power BI. Although users suggest features like better Google Sheets handling and improved collaboration tools, Zapier continues to provide expansive automation, enhancing efficiency and facilitating new opportunities through integrations.
What Features Stand Out in Zapier?In logistics, Zapier enhances operations by automating exception tracking and third-party software integration. Its use in CRM and social media streamlines lead creation and workflow automation. Users from diverse industries leverage its extensive connectivity to support intelligence management, generate analytical insights, and execute cross-functional tasks efficiently.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.