Splunk SOAR vs ThreatQ comparison

Splunk and ThreatQuotient are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Splunk is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while ThreatQuotient is ranked #26. Splunk holds a 7.1% mindshare in SOAR, compared to ThreatQuotient’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ThreatQuotient users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

ThreatQ and Splunk SOAR are solutions in the security operations space. Splunk SOAR generally holds an upper hand with its comprehensive automation features, justifying a higher investment with deep functionality.

Features: ThreatQ offers integration capabilities, data enrichment, and threat prioritization, enhancing team responses. Splunk SOAR provides rapid threat response, flexible customization, and advanced playbooks, focusing on automation and collaborative capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk SOAR has straightforward deployment and a good support structure, important for quick operational turnaround. ThreatQ requires a more complex deployment approach, needing technical understanding, yet offers adaptable support for sophisticated needs.

Pricing and ROI: ThreatQ is cost-effective, resulting in strong ROI through improved workflows and incident response. Splunk SOAR, while involving higher upfront costs, ensures significant ROI via extensive automation, reducing manual processes and boosting productivity.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatQ Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatQ

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 3.6%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.1%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatQ is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Splunk SOAR	7.1%
Torq	3.6%
ThreatQ	1.4%
Other	87.9%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

AdityaDesai

Solutions Architect at ProArch

Automation has streamlined multi-tenant SOC workflows and improves alert handling efficiency

Although the reporting within Torq is not that great, we did ask for many features regarding reporting in Torq, but due to some platform constraints, they could not make the whole dataset available for us to be used in reporting. Except for that, we used some basic reporting. When I used Torq, it was indeed in the early stages of AI capabilities. Only a few customers were allowed to use it, and we were among them. It functioned well as long as we summarized the data properly. If you input garbage, you would get garbage out. Thus, we had to do significant fine-tuning regarding what data context we provided to the AI orchestrator to get meaningful results. In terms of Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management compared to managing multiple point solutions across my security stack, I find it case-centric. The unified view in case management is good since it provides clarity, although there are limitations regarding how many items in case management can be modified at once. Bulk operations are very limited, potentially due to their back-end database or data retrieval processes that can be improved. Regarding improvements for Torq, when we were onboarded, there were aspects we were uncertain about, such as the number of cases that could be generated, what data we could bring in, how many clients we could onboard, and similar concerns. Initially, we also lacked clarity about the number of playbooks or workflows we could build. Different triggers like system triggers, case-based triggers, and others can be employed without restrictions, but when it comes to on-demand and scheduled jobs, there is a limitation based on the subscription and pricing tier that notably caps the number of workflows we can create. No bulk editing across cases was one issue, along with limited filtering related to single grouping constraints. Additionally, the out-of-the-box case templates provided require substantial modifications before they become usable. There is also a feature in the cases for notes that cannot be searched. They are only visible through the UI, which is another area for improvement. The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially. I am not sure if new customers are made aware of this. It seems that workflows revolving around cases hinder functionality outside of case management, as we have many use cases needing on-demand triggers and schedules for functions like reporting or polling devices. Creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers. While they facilitate optimization and scaling, the support received tends to be very basic. Improvements can be made in that area as well.

Read full review

Vikash Kushwaha

Full Stack Software Engineer at mindpathtech

Automated playbooks have transformed incident response and now protect critical services

The biggest advantage I see from my personal experience as an integrator with Splunk SOAR is that it integrates with most of the security features among the Defenders, Microsoft Defender, firewalls, CloudWatch, and AWS security agents, as well as EC2 machines, firewalls, EDR, IAM, email security, and antivirus. It automates the security process over phishing emails and any other brute force attacks. It helps quite a lot because if 100 phishing emails were sent to a domain, a developer can only reach one, two, or five, but for hundreds of others, it actually supports better automated playbooks and provides major security. Splunk SOAR introduced some new and innovative capabilities or approaches that transformed the way my SOC operates. Splunk SOAR provides playbooks for automatic security features, such as for firewalls, phishing mails, and utilizing Defenders or virtual tools. A playbook maintains its algorithms or processes, so if any kind of security issue arises, the playbook automatically runs and handles actions such as IP blocking or resolving brute force attacks, notifying the admin about suspicious users. After implementing Splunk SOAR, the training process for my SOC team to use playbooks takes a long time during the whole integration part, as it retrieves all credentials from us, whether for an EC2 machine or any antivirus. It takes about one to two months for the team to fully sustain and know the processes of the playbooks and security, particularly for three or four individuals in the cyber security or DevOps team. Splunk SOAR significantly reduces the time spent on monotonous security tasks. In banking, insurance, or healthcare, automated services for addressing phishing emails and security threats are common. Having a manual workforce of two or three individuals can only handle five or ten security threats while Splunk SOAR automates the entire process across apps and machines, making it easier and notifying the admin about the threats. If someone tries to breach, Splunk SOAR immediately processes incoming requests, validating them and blocking any unsecured requests, which reduces a lot of time and effort. With the help of the playbook viewer, I assess the visibility provided by Splunk SOAR as very positive, especially for security purposes. If someone is attacked by 100 users, it blocks all the users, while individual developers such as myself can only handle two or three at a time. The automated process of Splunk SOAR handles all the processes concurrently, making it a game-changing solution. It helps reduce mean time to resolve (MTTR). It takes around 10 to 20 minutes to resolve one incident through the whole process and notify the admin of the issue. If there are multiple incidents, calculating the time taken for each, it generally requires around 40 to 50 minutes to resolve five incidents.

Read full review

reviewer2384535

Threat Intelligence Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly

The tool is not user-friendly. It is not beginner-friendly. It would be very difficult for a beginner to learn the tool. It will take at least two months to get familiar with it. Building the playbook is a little difficult for a beginner. The vendor must simplify the tool and make it user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Torq has definitely changed the day-to-day experience for our security analysts, as they feel more excited and feel that Torq interface and workflow allow them to build things themselves."

"We have seen fewer failures of automations from the time Torq came into the picture, we've had a more streamlined process of handling incidents, and at the same time, we've learned to embed the AI into our incident types, and that is how it has helped us in the automation."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"Any request that comes in, regardless of how complex it is, I can accomplish it with Torq."

"Under one SOC tool in Torq, analysts get to know everything within the context of an alert or incident they are working on, and this ability to view the whole picture within Torq is one of the major breakthroughs and best offerings of Torq."

"With Torq, I automate actions while achieving SLA compliance and streamline alert investigation processes much better."

"If I review about 100 vendors that I might work with, Torq is definitely in the top five that gave me personally investment back, just because every bit of effort I put into Torq eventually became a workflow that gave it back to me."

"Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts, it is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert, I have all the information that I need, I do not need to connect to different vendors to receive this information, and the main thing I got from Torq is time, which now helps me to build another automated system and learn."

More Torq pros

"In Splunk SOAR, I find the playbooks valuable. We get to create multiple playbooks, and within each playbook, there is a different type of investigation attached to it, which helps out an analyst or new analysts coming on board."

"One particular example I can recall is that in enterprise, we get around 100 to 200 notables daily, which consumes approximately 16 to 40 hours per day for an analyst, but since we have Splunk SOAR, it is now just about five to seven minutes or five to 10 minutes per alert."

"The benefits were immediate when we started using Mission Control Splunk SOAR over a year ago; it has made it easier for our analysts to work on alerts using playbooks and forward them."

"Workflow management is most valuable. It is easily customizable"

"We decided to use Splunk SOAR because it's a powerful, reliable engine that has significantly improved our SOC operations, especially in terms of incident response time and scaling features."

"Splunk SOAR helps reduce my mean time to detect significantly and enhances it very well; it reduces the mean time to detect by approximately 70%."

"I like the integration capabilities of Phantom. It has a lot of integrations with other products. Its searching methodologies are also good. It is also easy to understand and easy to create playbooks."

"Fortunately, the system helps to parse through these alerts and determine which ones are important and need further investigation."

More Splunk SOAR pros

"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."

"Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy."

Cons

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Regarding the pricing of Torq, I would say it is expensive."

"We have MCP that we are working with our cloud security platform, and we wanted to connect this MCP to the case management."

"However, we did encounter some problems with custom steps, which definitely affected our progress, and the speed of bug fixes is also a bit slower than expected."

"Torq can be improved by adding some more features, such as adding more automation and providing a no-code option so I don't have to code for everything."

"If Torq could enhance its AI features, it would benefit customers significantly by making the platform even more user-friendly."

"The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially, and creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers."

"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."

More Torq cons

"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution so far."

"Improving the integration ecosystem can raise the quality of the bottom tier of the integrations so that they can work better out of the box."

"The cost of Splunk SOAR has room for improvement."

"From the improvement point of view regarding Splunk SOAR, I suggest including more types of LLM models such as autonomous AI models including Anthropic and Opus 4.6, as well as creating a playground for new users to work on these, which will significantly help solve complex problems and assist new companies in understanding how Splunk works easily."

"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."

"The tool's response is slower because it has to search through a huge dataset, which can be improved for latency."

"It would be ideal for us if Splunk SOAR could integrate with Teams."

More Splunk SOAR cons

"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."

"The tool is not user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"The tool is not cheap."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."

"Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

The only thing is more out-of-the-box integrations. Torq already has a lot of supported integrations and adding new o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

For Torq, first of all, it's a hyperautomation and AI assistant usage. Our EDR SentinelOne is integrated in Torq and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

I think I have told everything about Torq that I can share at this stage, but I am still in the process of learning t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

For pricing, I would rate Splunk SOAR a seven where one is high price and ten is low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

When it comes to Splunk SOAR, in terms of improvement, I feel there should be some pre-deployed solutions available. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Splunk Phantom?

I started working with Splunk SOAR four years ago. I provide Splunk SOAR solutions to our customers as an MSSP. We wo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 25% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 10% of the time

Swimlane vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

Dropzone AI vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 11% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs ThreatQ

Compared 20% of the time

EclecticIQ vs ThreatQ

Compared 13% of the time

Anomali vs ThreatQ

Compared 9% of the time

Recorded Future vs ThreatQ

Compared 7% of the time

Exabeam vs ThreatQ

Compared 3% of the time

More ThreatQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

July 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

July 2026

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

July 2026

Download ThreatQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

Phantom

No data available

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

Splunk SOAR focuses on automating security operations with seamless third-party integrations and customizable workflows, enhancing incident response and threat management.

Splunk SOAR offers robust playbook automation and powerful API connectivity, allowing organizations to streamline workflows and integrate extensively with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow. With its capabilities in real-time data visualization and automated threat responses, it significantly enhances security and reduces manual efforts. Users appreciate the ease of creating playbooks, which reduces mean time to detect and resolve. However, attention to its integration challenges with Microsoft products, the need for more playbooks, and improved customization tools is necessary. Enhancements in the development process, visibility, scalability, and case management options are also beneficial. Improving documentation and training resources would add more depth and accessibility.

What are the top features of Splunk SOAR?

Third-party integrations: Supports extensive integration with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow.
Playbook automation: Facilitates easy creation and management of automated workflows.
Customizable workflows: Offers Python-based customization for tailored security operations.
API connectivity: Powerful API support for seamless tool consolidation and streamlined workflows.
Data visualization: Provides real-time data visualization for enhanced situational awareness.

What benefits or ROI users should consider?

Operational efficiency: Reduces mean time to detect and resolve incidents through automation.
Manual effort reduction: Automates threat responses, minimizing manual workload in security operations.
Enhanced security: Offers end-to-end visibility and automated threat mitigation processes.
Time savings: Optimizes processes and improves response efficiency in cybersecurity operations.

Organizations implement Splunk SOAR in industries to automate tasks in Security Operation Centers, addressing incidents such as phishing, brute force, and ransomware. It integrates with third-party applications for threat intelligence enrichment, commonly deployed both on-premise and cloud, enhancing cybersecurity efforts.

Splunk

ThreatQ is a cybersecurity platform designed to enhance threat intelligence operations. It centralizes and manages threat data, allowing organizations to identify and respond to threats more efficiently.

ThreatQ is designed to empower security teams by personalizing threat intelligence and automation processes. It integrates with existing technologies, streamlining data collection and distribution. This promotes efficient detection, investigation, and response to security incidents, improving overall cybersecurity posture and resilience.

What are the key features of ThreatQ?

Data Aggregation: Centralizes threat data from multiple sources for easy access.
Customization: Tailors threat intelligence to suit specific security needs.
Automation: Streamlines repetitive security tasks to save time.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing security tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces time needed for threat investigation.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Provides actionable insights for security actions.
Cost Savings: Maximizes existing security resources and investments.
Scalability: Adapts as organizations grow and threats evolve.

ThreatQ is versatile in industries like finance and healthcare, where cybersecurity is crucial. It facilitates swift threat identification and risk management, essential for protecting sensitive data and complying with industry regulations. Its adaptability allows it to fit into diverse security architectures, making it a valuable asset across sectors.

ThreatQuotient

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatQ

June 2026

Free Report: Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatQ and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatQ report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.