Splunk Observability Cloud and Veeam Data Platform compete in the IT monitoring and data protection space. Splunk tends to lead in monitoring and observability features, while Veeam offers strong data protection and recovery services, making it ideal for organizations focused on backup efficiency.
Features: Splunk Observability Cloud provides a comprehensive suite for monitoring, dashboard creation, and reporting. It integrates well with cloud-native environments, offering insights into infrastructure and application performance. Splunk's ability to create custom dashboards provides a clear view of transactions and user response times. Veeam Data Platform excels in backup and replication, focusing on data protection and recovery with ease of integration into existing environments. Notable Veeam features include instant VM recovery, file-level recovery, and backup verification.
Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud could improve by reducing high licensing costs, simplifying its pricing model, and enhancing integration with alternative ecosystems. Users have expressed a need for a more intuitive navigation experience. Veeam Data Platform users point out the high costs and need for better integration with non-Windows systems and third-party applications. Expanding platform compatibility and enhancing cloud integration remains a priority for Veeam.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud supports cloud and hybrid deployments, with generally positive feedback on its responsive customer service, although support quality can vary. Veeam Data Platform also supports flexible deployment but is geared towards on-premises environments. Despite good technical support feedback, Veeam occasionally faces challenges with response times and license complexities. Splunk's deployment adaptability provides an advantage across environments, while Veeam offers reliable support favoring traditional infrastructure models.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive, especially due to pricing based on data volume, which might deter smaller organizations despite the ROI from enhanced visibility. Veeam Data Platform, though also costly, offers excellent data protection, reportedly reducing downtime and delivering efficient data management, presenting a notable ROI. While both solutions deliver high value in their areas of strength, pricing remains a critical factor in customer decision-making.
Using Splunk has saved my organization about 30% of our budget compared to using multiple different monitoring products.
Anyone working in front-end management should recognize the market price to see the true value of end-user monitoring.
They often require multiple questions, with five or six emails to get a response.
Support from Splunk is not very helpful because Splunk doesn't have a dedicated APM; they only have one APM engineer in Korea.
They did respond to us, but they did not explicitly inform us about the feature's absence.
Most cases are handled perfectly.
We've used the solution across more than 250 people, including engineers.
I would rate its scalability a nine out of ten.
The issue is mainly about pricing because if they want to monitor more, it costs money.
It involves acquiring additional licenses as needed.
In order to scale Veeam Data Platform, we have to pay a lot more money.
I would rate its stability a nine out of ten.
We rarely have problems accessing the dashboard or the page.
Unlike NetScout or regular agents for APM, RUM has many problems during the POC phase because customer environments vary widely.
There are no issues with stability in Veeam Data Platform.
There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available.
Improvements in dashboard configuration, customization, and artificial intelligence functionalities are desired.
Customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms.
The improvement we would like to see is the option to scale Veeam Data up in smaller sections rather than large sections, which requires paying much more.
Reducing it by 20% would make it more accessible to a broader range of customers.
OpenStack is something Veeam Data Platform doesn't support, and they haven't indicated that they will support it in the future.
Splunk is a bit expensive since it charges based on the indexing rate of data.
It appears to be expensive compared to competitors.
Splunk is a little expensive, however, it is in line with the current market pricing.
A reduction of 20% in the current cost would make the solution more attractive to clients.
Veeam Data Platform is more expensive than OpenStack because we pay for it in US dollars, while we pay for OpenStack in Egyptian pounds.
From what I know, it is expensive to add modules, with a scale rating of eight out of ten.
Splunk provides advanced notifications of roadblocks in the application, which helps us to improve and avoid impacts during high-volume days.
For troubleshooting, we can detect problems in seconds, which is particularly helpful for digital teams.
It offers unified visibility for logs, metrics, and traces.
The platform is user-friendly, comprehensive, and compatible with numerous market solutions, including virtualization and bare metal servers.
Veeam Data Platform is valuable for its stability and the ability to easily contact support for assistance.
Veeam Data Platform provides me with the most useful features such as application restore, single file restore, backup and replication, and continuous replication.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.
Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.
What are the key features?In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.
Veeam Data Platform ensures comprehensive data resilience by offering secure backups and intelligent data insights, catering to the complexities of modern data management.
Veeam Data Platform empowers businesses with reliable data protection, orchestrated recovery, and streamlined management. Providing peace of mind, it guarantees data is secure, available, and effortlessly recoverable. Organizations benefit from features such as instant recovery, simplified management, and compatibility with virtual environments. While it shines in backup and restore capabilities, it calls for improvements in integration with physical servers and enhanced cyber security features.
What are the key features of Veeam Data Platform?Organizations in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing utilize Veeam Data Platform for critical data management, ensuring business continuity and disaster recovery. Employed in securing both virtual and physical workloads, Veeam integrates cloud storage for enhanced scalability and efficiency.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.