Sophos Network Access Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

Sophos and ThreatLocker are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Sophos is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3, while ThreatLocker is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.2. Sophos holds a 2.2% mindshare in NAC, compared to ThreatLocker’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Sophos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of ThreatLocker users who would recommend it.

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 24 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,030 Views
999 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Read 40 ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform reviews

3,528 Views
247 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Sophos Network Access Control and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform compete in the network security category. ThreatLocker seems to have the upper hand due to strong endpoint protection features and robust zero-trust methodologies, even with its higher pricing.

Features: Sophos Network Access Control offers robust network access management, comprehensive device compliance checks before connection, and seamless integration with existing security policies. ThreatLocker provides comprehensive application whitelisting, policy enforcement, and a strong zero-trust approach that prevent unauthorized access and activities at endpoints.

Room for Improvement: Sophos could improve by enhancing its endpoint protection capabilities, offering more granular controls, and improving user experience in complex network environments. ThreatLocker could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, expanding integration capabilities, and reducing the learning curve associated with its comprehensive features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos integrates seamlessly with existing networks, supported by reliable customer service and thorough documentation, making the deployment straightforward. ThreatLocker offers a cloud-based deployment model, requiring minimal infrastructure changes but presenting a steeper learning curve, balanced by attentive customer support that ensures smooth transitions.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos presents a competitive setup cost with visible ROI through effective network management. ThreatLocker has a higher initial setup cost, justified by the value of enhanced endpoint security and zero-trust features, leading to a strong ROI that makes it an attractive option for businesses prioritizing endpoint protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Sophos Network Access Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

4th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (6th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), Application Control (1st), ZTNA (4th), Ransomware Protection (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 2.2%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 1.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform	1.1%
Sophos Network Access Control	2.2%
Other	96.7%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

HirenPatel2

Manager at rspl

Have faced delays in support despite strong multi-layer policy configuration

I have observed some disadvantages as we have experienced one particular problem. We were facing an issue of synchronization of the endpoint with our firewall with help on a cloud for heartbeat syncing. However, it was not syncing as per our requirement. The user has to connect our firewall with the help of VPN. We were supposed to assume a solution on a cloud, which has good synchronization on a cloud with Sophos Central. It will sync with our firewall as well with the help of Sophos Central. Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control. We have to connect with VPN. We are expecting that if we have already installed an endpoint on our system and it is connected to the internet, then it must be synchronized on a cloud with Sophos Central. Through Sophos Central, it must connect with our firewall. If the endpoint is configured on Sophos Central and the firewall is also configured in Sophos Central, then there should be no need to connect to VPN.

Read full review

Charles Loveland

Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

World-class support and highly effective for application control and elevation

Their product is solid. I have a hard time complaining much about it because when we do find little things, they are usually interface-related or related to things that would be nice to have. Their idea portal, unlike so many other vendors we deal with, shows movement. At least four to eight features of ThreatLocker exist because I made a request in the last five years, and it became a feature of the actual product. When it comes to improvements, we moved the product as customers, and we got to move the product by making suggestions. They seem to be very reactive to it, so there is not a whole lot that they actively need to change right now. It is one of those situations where when we run into something that would be nice to have, it happens. They make it work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I found all Sophos Network Access Control features valuable, but IP blocking is the most useful."

"There is really good visibility for the appliance."

"The solution offers very good visibility."

"The role-based access controls feature of Sophos Network Access Control allows persons at different positions in an organization to have different types of roles."

"I am very satisfied with this solution overall. All of the features that we use have been working successfully."

"Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything."

"Web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering are the most valuable features of Sophos Network Access Control."

"Sophos' technical support is great, very fast and responsive, and they always know how to fix the problem."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

"Being able to protect and trust nothing by default, known as zero trust, is the most important feature to me."

"With ThreatLocker, we don't have shadow IT, and it has reduced ransomware."

"Blocking is done comprehensively."

"The application management on any workstation with the solution is valuable. I find it valuable that it indicates whether the software is part of our pre-approved list, adding a nice layer of protection. It works great because people cannot just install or download any app from the web."

"What sets ThreatLocker apart from competitors offering similar solutions is ringfencing. The ringfencing controls, along with the application elevation features, keep it out of the user's line of sight while still protecting them."

"ThreatLocker provides visibility into user activity and application usage, empowering organizations to define acceptable applications and web browsers."

"If all of our vendors would act and support us like ThreatLocker does, we would be happy."

"We are seeing a return on investment, especially with our managers and customers."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pros

Cons

"Sophos Network Access Control could be improved by having an ASIC chip similar to FortiNAC, as this would provide better processing for big organizations."

"One area in which the product could be improved is the user interface. While functional, it can be somewhat cluttered and unintuitive, especially for new users."

"Sophos Network Access Control needs improvement regarding its slow interface, loading time, and reporting."

"It would be beneficial to consider some improvements regarding the dashboard."

"Continuous development in specific areas might be required."

"Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"I would like to be able to fully customize the reports."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

"ThreatLocker Allowlisting needs to improve its user interface and overall workflow."

"It is not easy to use. I am still learning."

"Something we have come up against a couple of times is that we have two clients that are software developers. They create software that doesn't have digital signatures and that's not easy to categorize or whitelist with ThreatLocker. We have to go in and make custom rules to allow them to do their work and to be protected from malicious threats."

"There are some times when applications get submitted, the hashes don't really line up."

"I'm not sure if I'm using it wrong; however, I find that I have to babysit it too much."

"The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself."

"I find that the learning mode is too accessible. Technicians sometimes default to it instead of manually building policy controls. I would prefer the learning mode to be harder to access, ideally hidden behind a layer that requires creating at least one policy first before using the learning mode as a supplement."

"I cannot suggest anything that they are not already doing. They should keep adding features as they have been."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite expensive."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

"ThreatLocker's pricing seems justifiable."

"The price of ThreatLocker Allowlisting is reasonable in the market, but it is not fantastic."

"I find ThreatLocker's pricing to be reasonable for the services it provides."

"The price is very reasonable, and we have been able to integrate ThreatLocker with all of our clients."

"I believe ThreatLocker's pricing model is fair and flexible, allowing account managers to offer customized deals based on our specific needs."

"I can't complain. Cheaper would always be nice, but I think it's reasonable compared to other software in the cybersecurity market."

"Its price is fair. They have added some additional things to it beyond allowlisting. They are up-charging for them, but in terms of the value we get and the way it impacts us, we get a bang for our buck with ThreatLocker than a lot of our other security tools."

"The pricing is reasonable and normal. I do not have any problems with the cost."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

The pricing of Sophos Network Access Control is good, but it is somewhat high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

In my opinion, one feature that should be added is the ability to trace emails from individuals who change their IP address or send misbehaving emails from alternative networks. If someone sends a ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sophos Network Access Control?

Sophos Network Access Control serves primary use cases for both networking purposes and security purposes.

See all answers

What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

Pricing, setup costs, and licensing have been pretty accessible and manageable. It was not too expensive to get started, especially at a small scale for a smaller MSP. It is very accessible, easy t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

Going with the theme of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform being a one-stop shop where they have just about everything, and they have a really good product stack as is. However, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 27% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 20% of the time

Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 13% of the time

Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 10% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Airlock Digital Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Application Control Plus vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

January 2026

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Buyer's Guide

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

January 2026

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report

Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing

Overview

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sophos

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.

ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.

What are the most important features?

Application Control: Ensures only approved applications can be executed, minimizing security risks.
Selective Elevation: Provides granular control over application permissions without compromising security.
Ring-Fencing: Isolates applications to limit possible damage from compromised software.
Comprehensive Blocking: Blocks unauthorized applications, supporting zero-trust strategies.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform for managing security tools efficiently.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies complex security processes, making them manageable for non-expert users.
Reduced Operational Costs: Minimizes resource expenditure through effective security management.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection against unauthorized access and malicious scripts.
Responsive Support: Offers quick and effective assistance to minimize downtime and issues.

Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.

ThreatLocker

Sample Customers

Rushmoor Borough Council

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Sophos Network Access Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos Network Access Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sophos Network Access Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.