Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs Stormshield Network Security comparison

Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Stormshield Network Security compete in the network security category. Cyberoam appears to have the edge with its unique identity-based security approach.

Features: Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers identity-based policy creation, bandwidth management, and dual AV engine. Its identity-based security is a standout feature in the UTM market. Stormshield Network Security provides robust firewall capabilities, efficient rule management, and reliable URL filtering, recognized for performance across various environments.

Room for Improvement: Sophos Cyberoam UTM could improve scalability, modern attack support, and policy complexity. Integration with cloud services and price adjustments are also suggested. Stormshield should focus on reducing costs, enhancing guidance for feature configuration, and improving web filtering and documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Stormshield are primarily on-premises deployments with some hybrid and cloud options. Sophos is noted for trustworthy technical support but experiences occasional delays. Stormshield also receives praise but needs to improve support responsiveness and presales interactions.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos Cyberoam UTM is considered cost-effective with flexible pricing despite being labeled as expensive. The ROI is deemed good, though advanced feature costs might accumulate. Stormshield offers a similar pricing strategy, with user suggestions for lower pricing on entry-level devices. It provides reasonable ROI appealing to mid-sized companies.