Skybox Security Suite vs Zafran Security comparison

Tufin and Zafran Security are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Tufin is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.6, while Zafran Security is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.4. Tufin holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Zafran Security’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Tufin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zafran Security users who would recommend it.

Skybox Security Suite

Read 37 Skybox Security Suite reviews

511 Views
229 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Zafran Security

Read 5 Zafran Security reviews

858 Views
101 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Skybox Security Suite

Zafran Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 1, 2025

Skybox Security Suite and Zafran Security compete in the cybersecurity market as solutions offering powerful security tools. Skybox Security Suite is preferred for its robust features and intelligent threat analysis, whereas Zafran Security is known for its cost-effectiveness and seamless integration capabilities, giving it an edge in pricing and deployment.

Features: Skybox Security Suite provides dynamic vulnerability management, advanced analytics tools, and comprehensive threat intelligence, making it ideal for large enterprises with complex networks. Zafran Security excels in real-time threat detection, incident response capabilities, and useful risk management modules, which enhance its ability to adapt to current threat landscapes.

Room for Improvement: Skybox Security Suite could improve by simplifying its complexity for greater accessibility, providing quicker updates for real-time analysis, and enhancing API integration capabilities. Zafran Security can advance by expanding its threat intelligence capabilities, improving its incident response time, and offering more extensive documentation for better user accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Skybox Security Suite's deployment is guided by extensive documentation and a structured model, allowing users to leverage its detailed resources. Zafran Security emphasizes a streamlined deployment experience and responsive support, contributing to its easy implementation and customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Skybox Security Suite requires a higher initial investment but offers a strong ROI due to its sophisticated features. Zafran Security is more budget-friendly and offers a shorter ROI period thanks to its cost-efficient framework, making it an excellent option for businesses looking for improved cost management.

To learn more, read our detailed Skybox Security Suite vs. Zafran Security Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Skybox Security Suite vs. Zafran Security

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Skybox Security Suite

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

30th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewall Security Management (6th)

Zafran Security

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

18th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Skybox Security Suite is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

NenadMijatovic

Director of Sales at S4E Serbia

Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use

Vulnerability management is the most valuable feature because it lets you focus on the most critical vulnerabilities. That's the important thing. Here in Serbia, there are not so many companies that have too many firewalls inside one company. So, they usually don't buy this model for Firewall Assurance unless there is some compliance. So you can prove that your firewalls are compliant. So, that model is not so important here in Serbia. It's for bigger companies. So, they usually buy network assurance to build the model of the network and vulnerability management to focus on the most important vulnerabilities. Moreover, Skybox can collect data for many vendors. From the endpoint protection vendors to the network equipment vendors to other security vendors. So, it supports more than one hundred vendors to collect data from them.

Read full review

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Skybox allows organizations to reprioritize the vulnerability they attempt to patch and mitigate, based on the contextual awareness of the network."

"It has a good policy management feature and can provide customers with good quality outputs."

"It's very supportive and very user-friendly."

"Aside from Firewall Assurance, we are using Network Assurance and Change Manager for an overview of the whole network and for documenting requests and the recertification of the ruleset."

"It can be integrated with a vulnerability management solution. When a client comes, apart from pitching network and firewall change management, we are recommending having vulnerability management. So, rather than just having the audit of the firewall, they can integrate it with their vulnerability management solution, which could be Rapid7, Qualys, or any other solution. This provides them the most value out of the platform. That is the way we are approaching our customer base."

"We use Network Assurance for network visualisation and troubleshooting."

"The most valuable features are Firewall Assurance and Vulnerability Control."

"The solution's simplicity of use is its most valuable feature."

More Skybox Security Suite pros

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

Cons

"During implementation, we realised approximately 30 devices were not supported by the Skybox platform."

"The initial setup with Skybox Security is hard. You need one or two strong security engineers on your team."

"There is room for improvement in pricing. It would be better, especially if a customer bought all four modules."

"The setup documentation needs a lot of improvement."

"Skybox Security Suite's attack surface management feature needs improvement."

"If anything could be improved it would be staying on top of the collector scripts, but I understand that's a very tough challenge."

"The solution needs improvement in firewall configuration checks. I would also like to see more configuration checks for Forcepoint and for other non-supported firewalls."

"Skybox should improve their UX features by making them easier to use."

More Skybox Security Suite cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With licensing, the number of network nodes becomes very expensive to the point where you have to rationalize if the tools are warranted anymore."

"Currently, the licensing costs me about $300 USD for the year. This is a huge amount for my environment."

"The solution is based on a subscription model for annual licenses."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Skybox Security Suite has indeed helped us reduce costs. The prices of AlgoSec and Skybox Security Suite are approximately 50 percent different. The tool may require special vendor support from abroad, resulting in slightly higher costs. Its pricing is in the middle."

"I've seen the pricing of every solution on the market. When you compare apples to apples, where Skybox becomes exceedingly expensive is if you look at it compared to something like FireMon that only does a fraction of what Skybox does. But if you include everything that Skybox does, it becomes way more expensive than the competition, but you're also not comparing apples to apples. If you look at FireMon, and you look at like just the firewall assurance piece, they are fairly comparable and, actually, Skybox comes in a little bit cheaper in some cases, depending on which product you're looking at."

"I think for the cost, what we got definitely is worth it. The only caution I would give is that whenever you license for Firewall Assurance at the same time, for some weird reason, you have to get one Network Assurance license, just to manage one firewall. That's a little bit of overkill. But otherwise, in general, the pricing is fairly okay."

"It's expensive."

More Skybox Security Suite pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Skybox Security Suite?

Overall, the tool has helped us reduce risks. If any step is missing, it's easier for my team or engineers to identify it. The tool provides accurate recommendations based on the data. Its integrat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Skybox Security Suite?

From a commercial perspective, AlgoSec is more expensive compared to Skybox Security Suite. Skybox Security Suite is cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Skybox Security Suite?

The dashboard's UI is not interesting; it is quite normal. It would be better if something more attractive or similar useful information found in AlgoSec was available.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

The current pricing of Zafran Security is fair overall. They were good to work with to accommodate our organization with a longer-term cost model that worked best for us, so they are a good partner...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements. Overall, you get some dashboards and widgets to start with that are helpful, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Zafran Security is helping reduce the amount of critical vulnerabilities in our environments that require prompt remediation. It has helped us focus on the assets and critical vulnerabilities that ...

See all answers

Comparisons

AlgoSec vs Skybox Security Suite

Compared 32% of the time

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Skybox Security Suite

Compared 30% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Skybox Security Suite

Compared 13% of the time

RedSeal vs Skybox Security Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Skybox Security Suite

Compared 3% of the time

More Skybox Security Suite Competitors

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 41% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Skybox Security Suite

June 2025

Download Skybox Security Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

June 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Overview

Skybox Security Suite provides comprehensive tools for network and firewall compliance, vulnerability management, and change management, with a focus on risk reduction and network optimization.

Skybox Security Suite supports over 130 vendors with massive scalability and seamless integration, notably with Nessus and Qualys. Its features include network path analysis and offline attack simulation, which enhance management effectiveness. Despite its robust offering, improvements are needed in its UI, web interface, reporting detail, and customization. Automation, orchestration, and device policy provisioning require better support, and integration with tools like Rapid7 could be improved. Enhancements in firewall configuration checks, cloud connectivity, pricing, and marketing awareness are also called for, alongside a transition from Java GUI to a consistent web-based system.

What Are Key Features of Skybox Security Suite?

Network Assurance: Enhances visibility and optimization of network paths.
Firewall Assurance: Facilitates firewall rule set audits for compliance.
Vulnerability Management: Offers path detection and risk prioritization.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to standards like PCI.
Change Management: Simplifies management across extensive infrastructures.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Scalability: Supports numerous vendors and large-scale deployments.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with tools like Nessus and Qualys.
Risk Reduction: Improves security across network infrastructures.
Simplified Management: User-friendly interface and reporting tools enhance usability.
Network Optimization: Streamlines processes and improves performance.

Skybox Security Suite is commonly used in industries requiring strict compliance like finance and healthcare. Firms employ it for firewall audits, enhancing network visibility, and managing configurations against standards such as PCI, ensuring security and policy compliance across expansive networks.

Tufin

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Sample Customers

ADP, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BT, USAID, Delta Dental, EDF Energy, EMC, HSBC, Johnson & Johnson

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Skybox Security Suite vs. Zafran Security

June 2025

Free Report: Skybox Security Suite vs. Zafran Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Skybox Security Suite vs. Zafran Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Skybox Security Suite vs. Zafran Security report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.