We performed a comparison between Sciforma and Zoho Sprints based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The interface of Zoho Sprints is an area with certain shortcomings."
Sciforma is ranked 19th in Project Management Software with 3 reviews while Zoho Sprints is ranked 25th in Project Management Software with 1 review. Sciforma is rated 9.6, while Zoho Sprints is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho Sprints writes "A task management tool that provides its users with functionalities that are easy to use". Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Zoho Sprints is most compared with Jira.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
