ScienceLogic vs TruView comparison

ScienceLogic and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ScienceLogic is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while NETSCOUT is ranked #70 with an average rating of 5.0. ScienceLogic holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

5,321 Views
2,820 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

967 Views
909 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and TruView are competing in the network management and monitoring category. ScienceLogic appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive suite of functions and efficient automation capabilities compared to TruView's specialized performance monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic offers extensive integration possibilities, enhanced automation, and comprehensive analytics providing deep insights into IT environments. TruView focuses on detailed network performance analytics with real-time data visualization and accurate network issue pinpointing.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve in providing more tailored performance monitoring features and optimizing deployment in specific infrastructures. TruView may enhance its automation capabilities, expand integration options, and improve adaptability across diverse IT environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a flexible deployment model supporting both on-premise and cloud solutions with dedicated support channels, and its customer service is agile with rapid responses. TruView typically requires more specialized setup but benefits from optimization in deployment within certain infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's setup cost can be higher with significant investment in initial implementation but delivers considerable ROI through increased efficiency and reduced operational overhead. TruView, with generally lower setup costs, offers competitive ROI focused on high-value network performance insights.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. TruView Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. TruView

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), AIOps (9th)

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

70th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.3%
TruView	0.4%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"Life before ScienceLogic was quite responsive, although we did managed services to a degree, they were more of a point in time check for the health of the client system rather than real time deep analysis, but now we’re able to resolve client problems not only before they have a problem but also, when we have to troubleshoot, we can look back in time and get a picture of what was going on with the network to avoid repeat occurrences."

"The Power Packs that are available are amazing."

"The customer service and support has been the best of any vendor I have had experience dealing with in my professional history."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"The product provides agentless monitoring which is based on SNMP so there's no need to install the monitoring agent on each and every server."

"The customizable dashboard is my favorite feature because I have everything that matters to me in my role available immediately at sign on, and we can also customize a customer's dashboard view so that from analyst to C-level executive we can give the customer exactly what they want and need to see at sign on."

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

More ScienceLogic pros

"It gives us the ability to determine the root of a problem or a network, whether it's on the network side, the database, application server, or server infrastructure."

"TruView takes only minutes to install."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"Visual TruView helped our network team respond to potential issues before they became larger ones."

Cons

"Reporting needs to be improved. It was sold as a tool we could use for our clients and it was a complete failure."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"As we have increased the amount of devices and the range of those devices we have run in to scaling issues which will most likely cause us to stand up a brand new instance of ScienceLogic to meet our needs."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

More ScienceLogic cons

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

"Whilst Citrix could be handled better like their nGenius product line (which does an excellent job) it copes with the centralised type of deployment TruView covers."

"I can't give them quite a 10, because from time to time, I'll work with the folks who, not that they're not good, but there are some who are just phenomenal."

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

20%

Construction Company

11%

Transportation Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

See all answers

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

OmniPeek vs TruView

Compared 14% of the time

LiveNX vs TruView

Compared 13% of the time

ClearSight Analyzer vs TruView

Compared 13% of the time

PingPlotter vs TruView

Compared 11% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs TruView

Compared 10% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

March 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

March 2026

Download TruView product report

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. TruView

March 2026

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.