Ruckus Cloudpath vs Sophos Network Access Control comparison

Ruckus and Sophos are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Ruckus is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.4, while Sophos is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5. Ruckus holds a 2.2% mindshare in NAC, compared to Sophos’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Ruckus users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Sophos users who would recommend it.

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 13 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

1,051 Views
1,051 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 24 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,172 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Sophos Network Access Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Sophos Network Access Control and Ruckus Cloudpath are both key players in network security and access management. Ruckus Cloudpath is often viewed as superior due to its comprehensive features, justifying its higher price.

Features: Sophos Network Access Control provides advanced threat detection, a robust firewall, and endpoint protection. Ruckus Cloudpath offers seamless integration with existing infrastructures, strong wireless authentication, and user-friendly device policy enforcement.

Room for Improvement: Sophos could enhance its wireless authentication capabilities, integration with third-party systems, and user-friendliness in certain complex setups. Ruckus Cloudpath might improve its initial deployment complexity, pricing flexibility, and further simplify its cloud management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos offers straightforward on-premise deployment with excellent customer service, aiding users throughout the setup. Ruckus Cloudpath's cloud-based deployment provides flexibility but involves more complex initial configurations. Customer support is competent for both, with Sophos noted for its more hands-on assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos Network Access Control offers lower setup costs and a quicker ROI, appealing to budget-oriented organizations. Ruckus Cloudpath, although requiring a higher initial investment, offers a longer-term ROI through its extensive features and integration capabilities, providing value-driven returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,594 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 2.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ruckus Cloudpath	2.2%
Sophos Network Access Control	2.3%
Other	95.5%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Gary Koh

Area Manager at Alpha Media Pte Ltd

Has improved network monitoring through intelligent features and simplified onboarding

I am using the certificate-based security feature in the product. The certificate-based security feature helps clients understand what Ruckus Cloudpath can do. Whether cloud or on-premises is used is defined by the clients. They are knowledgeable about the products, so minimal explanation is required. Policy management tools in Ruckus Cloudpath are performing adequately. The integration of Ruckus Cloudpath with our infrastructure is very user-friendly, as the software is becoming more intelligent. It is becoming more intelligent because it is easier to install and implement. Managing IoT devices within a network environment has improved compared to previous versions. The software is more intelligent now, with AI features integrated into their management system. The MMS portion is the best feature in Ruckus Cloudpath, as they can monitor the entire network intelligently with AI features that simplify the troubleshooting processes.

Read full review

HirenPatel2

Manager at rspl

Have faced delays in support despite strong multi-layer policy configuration

I have observed some disadvantages as we have experienced one particular problem. We were facing an issue of synchronization of the endpoint with our firewall with help on a cloud for heartbeat syncing. However, it was not syncing as per our requirement. The user has to connect our firewall with the help of VPN. We were supposed to assume a solution on a cloud, which has good synchronization on a cloud with Sophos Central. It will sync with our firewall as well with the help of Sophos Central. Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control. We have to connect with VPN. We are expecting that if we have already installed an endpoint on our system and it is connected to the internet, then it must be synchronized on a cloud with Sophos Central. Through Sophos Central, it must connect with our firewall. If the endpoint is configured on Sophos Central and the firewall is also configured in Sophos Central, then there should be no need to connect to VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ruckus Cloudpath is effective for network security since it points out errors, especially when working with APIs."

"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."

"The Ruckus Cloudpath product performs well, especially with its single plane of authentication capabilities."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

"The most valuable features of Ruckus Cloudpath include its long-range capabilities, smooth and uninterrupted service, and reliability."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"Ruckus Cloudpath is very stable."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

More Ruckus Cloudpath pros

"I am very satisfied with this solution overall. All of the features that we use have been working successfully."

"What Sophos has done is integrate almost the entire OSI layer infrastructure. It gives me visibility across my infrastructure. It gives me visibility into all the mobile devices that are on my network and into the security I have on those mobile devices."

"The role-based access controls feature of Sophos Network Access Control allows persons at different positions in an organization to have different types of roles."

"We have had interactions with the technical support team through the Xnet platform. It's good."

"Web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering are the most valuable features of Sophos Network Access Control."

"Sophos has helped us to save time and money and to better manage web activities. It has also helped us to reduce misuse of the network and restrict hacking attempts."

"The user interface makes it easy to configure and use."

"The pricing is very reasonable and you can negotiate on the price."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

Cons

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

"There is room for improvement in deployment. I would like to see more effort put into troubleshooting."

"Ruckus Cloudpath needs more API features and enhanced automation capabilities."

"The setup had a few initial small problems, however, everything was resolved and it is very good now."

"The scalability could be better."

"The main disadvantage is the price, as it is primarily a cost issue."

"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."

More Ruckus Cloudpath cons

"The solution could offer more useful documentation."

"Sophos Network Access Control requires a lot of resources to work, which is an area for improvement. Pricing could also be improved because it's costly."

"The difficult thing was finding the metrics."

"Continuous development in specific areas might be required."

"I would like to be able to fully customize the reports."

"Sophos Network Access Control could be improved by having an ASIC chip similar to FortiNAC, as this would provide better processing for big organizations."

"In order to provide better management, it would be ideal with they offered better plugins for their firewall."

"The solution can improve the for applying policies. They can be complex depending don't the group they are applied to."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

"It is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath is on the expensive side. I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

There are some differences between competitors' products and Ruckus Cloudpath. In my business, I can manage those differences. Ruckus Cloudpath is not well known in my region, and I think it should...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

The pricing of Sophos Network Access Control is good, but it is somewhat high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

In my opinion, one feature that should be added is the ability to trace emails from individuals who change their IP address or send misbehaving emails from alternative networks. If someone sends a ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sophos Network Access Control?

Sophos Network Access Control serves primary use cases for both networking purposes and security purposes.

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 31% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 14% of the time

Portnox vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 9% of the time

SecureW2 JoinNow vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 7% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 13% of the time

Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 12% of the time

Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 11% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath

January 2026

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

January 2026

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Overview

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sophos

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rushmoor Borough Council

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

February 2026

Free Report: Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.