Ruckus Cloudpath vs Sophos Network Access Control comparison

Ruckus and Sophos are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Ruckus is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.3, while Sophos is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3. Ruckus holds a 2.0% mindshare in NAC, compared to Sophos’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Ruckus users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Sophos users who would recommend it.

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 12 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

964 Views
964 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 24 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,030 Views
999 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Sophos Network Access Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Sophos Network Access Control and Ruckus Cloudpath are both key players in network security and access management. Ruckus Cloudpath is often viewed as superior due to its comprehensive features, justifying its higher price.

Features: Sophos Network Access Control provides advanced threat detection, a robust firewall, and endpoint protection. Ruckus Cloudpath offers seamless integration with existing infrastructures, strong wireless authentication, and user-friendly device policy enforcement.

Room for Improvement: Sophos could enhance its wireless authentication capabilities, integration with third-party systems, and user-friendliness in certain complex setups. Ruckus Cloudpath might improve its initial deployment complexity, pricing flexibility, and further simplify its cloud management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos offers straightforward on-premise deployment with excellent customer service, aiding users throughout the setup. Ruckus Cloudpath's cloud-based deployment provides flexibility but involves more complex initial configurations. Customer support is competent for both, with Sophos noted for its more hands-on assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos Network Access Control offers lower setup costs and a quicker ROI, appealing to budget-oriented organizations. Ruckus Cloudpath, although requiring a higher initial investment, offers a longer-term ROI through its extensive features and integration capabilities, providing value-driven returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 2.2%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ruckus Cloudpath	2.0%
Sophos Network Access Control	2.2%
Other	95.8%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Gary Koh

Area Manager at Alpha Media Pte Ltd

Has improved network monitoring through intelligent features and simplified onboarding

I am using the certificate-based security feature in the product. The certificate-based security feature helps clients understand what Ruckus Cloudpath can do. Whether cloud or on-premises is used is defined by the clients. They are knowledgeable about the products, so minimal explanation is required. Policy management tools in Ruckus Cloudpath are performing adequately. The integration of Ruckus Cloudpath with our infrastructure is very user-friendly, as the software is becoming more intelligent. It is becoming more intelligent because it is easier to install and implement. Managing IoT devices within a network environment has improved compared to previous versions. The software is more intelligent now, with AI features integrated into their management system. The MMS portion is the best feature in Ruckus Cloudpath, as they can monitor the entire network intelligently with AI features that simplify the troubleshooting processes.

Read full review

HirenPatel2

Manager at rspl

Have faced delays in support despite strong multi-layer policy configuration

I have observed some disadvantages as we have experienced one particular problem. We were facing an issue of synchronization of the endpoint with our firewall with help on a cloud for heartbeat syncing. However, it was not syncing as per our requirement. The user has to connect our firewall with the help of VPN. We were supposed to assume a solution on a cloud, which has good synchronization on a cloud with Sophos Central. It will sync with our firewall as well with the help of Sophos Central. Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control. We have to connect with VPN. We are expecting that if we have already installed an endpoint on our system and it is connected to the internet, then it must be synchronized on a cloud with Sophos Central. Through Sophos Central, it must connect with our firewall. If the endpoint is configured on Sophos Central and the firewall is also configured in Sophos Central, then there should be no need to connect to VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."

"Ruckus Cloudpath is very stable."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"The Ruckus Cloudpath product performs well, especially with its single plane of authentication capabilities."

"The ease of use is great, and the automation wizards can do a lot."

"The best features of Ruckus Cloudpath include the deep integration with the education system, the Eduroam, and the ease of creating workflows to manage each authentication process separately, allowing me to create a separate workflow for employees, guests, and students while being flexible in adjusting the policy."

"I have found it easy to use with no significant issues once the small initial problems were resolved."

More Ruckus Cloudpath pros

"The biggest advantage of Sophos Network Access Control is that it is very synchronized with the security on both the endpoint and the firewall on a single platform, and it is easy to maintain."

"Sophos' technical support is great, very fast and responsive, and they always know how to fix the problem."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The pricing is very reasonable and you can negotiate on the price."

"The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer."

"I am very satisfied with this solution overall. All of the features that we use have been working successfully."

"The solution offers very good visibility."

"The installation is very straightforward."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

Cons

"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."

"There is room for improvement in deployment."

"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."

"The setup process is a bit complex."

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"Ruckus Cloudpath needs more API features and enhanced automation capabilities."

"The scalability could be better."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

More Ruckus Cloudpath cons

"The user interface, in terms of managing the product, could be better."

"Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control."

"I would like to be able to fully customize the reports."

"Continuous development in specific areas might be required."

"The solution could increase the integration with other platforms or other systems. This would be very useful."

"It would be good if Sophos Network Access Control had better integration with other devices."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"The solution could offer more useful documentation."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

"It is quite expensive."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

15%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath is on the expensive side. I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

The main disadvantage is the price, as it is primarily a cost issue. The new version coming out, R1, is yet to be seen, though currently, it is running very efficiently. The biggest challenges are ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

I think the pricing of the solution is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sophos Network Access Control?

I am currently using the product as a customer. We are using Sophos Network Access Control solution for security purposes and security analysis only.

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 43% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 30% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 16% of the time

Portnox vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 11% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 30% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 21% of the time

Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 13% of the time

Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 11% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath

December 2025

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

December 2025

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Overview

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sophos

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rushmoor Borough Council

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

December 2025

Free Report: Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.