We performed a comparison between RiskIQ Illuminate and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Mandiant, Palo Alto Networks, Trend Micro and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM)."The solution is stable with 12 years of established historical data."
"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."
"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"A low-cost service to evaluate the risk score of a supply chain would be very helpful."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
RiskIQ Illuminate is ranked 13th in Attack Surface Management (ASM) while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. RiskIQ Illuminate is rated 0.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of RiskIQ Illuminate writes "Able to discover unpatched servers, offers good stability, and scales very well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". RiskIQ Illuminate is most compared with Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Recorded Future and ZeroFOX, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.