Red Hat Fuse vs webMethods.io comparison

Red Hat and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Red Hat is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7. Red Hat holds a 6.7% mindshare in E, compared to IBM’s 9.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Red Hat Fuse

Read 25 Red Hat Fuse reviews

1,370 Views
1,315 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

8,762 Views
1,402 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Red Hat Fuse

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Red Hat Fuse and webMethods.io compete in the enterprise integration space, offering solutions for developers and businesses. Based on the data comparisons, webMethods.io seems to have an edge with its ease of use and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Features: Red Hat Fuse stands out with its integration capabilities offered through Apache Camel, providing a wide array of connectors. It is developer-friendly and flexible, praised for its scalability and reliability in complex integrations. webMethods.io is recognized for its ease of use and offers a robust set of out-of-box features with extensive connectors, providing a unified platform for diverse integration tasks and strong API management features.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Fuse faces challenges with documentation and user community support. The setup and configuration can be complex, and improvements are needed in the user interface and monitoring tools. Pricing is also a concern. webMethods.io is critiqued for its high cost and complexity in pricing models. Users suggest improved integration with legacy systems, enhanced documentation, and better version control.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Red Hat Fuse and webMethods.io offer hybrid and cloud deployment options. Red Hat Fuse is developer-friendly but could benefit from better support and comprehensive documentation. webMethods.io provides robust customer support with comprehensive service options, although its deployment can be complex and expensive.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Fuse is perceived as more cost-effective, especially for open-source users, but initial costs are high. Users report positive ROI over time. webMethods.io is often expensive, better suited for large-scale enterprises. Despite the high cost, it delivers strong outcomes and stable integrations, offering value against the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.2

Red Hat Fuse offers time savings and financial benefits over time, despite high initial costs and integration challenges.

Sentiment score

6.7

webMethods.io delivers positive ROI by reducing manual work, enhancing efficiency, and justifying costs despite high initial pricing.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Fuse report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the webMethods.io report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.4

Red Hat Fuse support is valued for helpfulness but needs improvement in response time and documentation, with variable user satisfaction.

Sentiment score

6.6

webMethods.io customer service is generally favorable but needs faster response and improved technical knowledge for complex issues.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the support for Red Hat Fuse as ten.

Luis Arce

Technology Manager at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Fuse report

An incident portal is available where we can raise tickets and based on priority, they reply.

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the webMethods.io report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Red Hat Fuse offers exceptional scalability for managing integrations and users, ideal for cloud and on-prem environments, despite minor scaling effort.

Sentiment score

7.2

webMethods.io scalability varies, effective with cloud and vertical scaling, but may require careful planning for high transaction volumes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Fuse report

Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.

ZiyadThaher

Sales Director at Proven Consult

If any webMethods.io product is installed on-premises and a company wants to scale its application, either vertical scaling or horizontal scaling is needed.

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.

Samer Ghanim

Information Technology Specialist at PACI

For more quotes and insights, download the webMethods.io report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.9

Red Hat Fuse is praised for stability, reliability, and performance, especially on Linux; challenges noted with Windows require adjustments.

Sentiment score

7.6

webMethods.io is stable with high user ratings, though stability varies by setup; cloud versions may need improvement.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Fuse report

We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.

ZiyadThaher

Sales Director at Proven Consult

There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.

Samer Ghanim

Information Technology Specialist at PACI

For more quotes and insights, download the webMethods.io report

Room For Improvement

Red Hat Fuse requires UI, documentation, and pricing improvements, better resource efficiency, and enhanced community support for easier use.

webMethods.io struggles with legacy models, integration issues, and cost, prompting user requests for UI, analytics, and AI enhancements.

There is the possibility to create services directly in Java and call them at a high level from Apache Camel and expose them with Red Hat Fuse.

Luis Arce

Technology Manager at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Fuse report

When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that.

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Another enhancement would be in OCR; currently, there is a huge demand for OCR capabilities. It would be perfect if webMethods.io had a built-in component for OCR, as this would be tested and allow customers to use it better than a third-party OCR application.

ZiyadThaher

Sales Director at Proven Consult

A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.

Samer Ghanim

Information Technology Specialist at PACI

For more quotes and insights, download the webMethods.io report

Setup Cost

Red Hat Fuse is valued for its open-source model, balancing cost-effectiveness with optional paid support, despite variable pricing perceptions.

webMethods.io provides flexible enterprise-focused pricing, notable for high capability yet potentially high costs, with scalable and negotiable options.

I think the pricing for Red Hat Fuse is okay; it's not expensive, and the support is good.

Luis Arce

Technology Manager at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Fuse report

Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.

ZiyadThaher

Sales Director at Proven Consult

For more quotes and insights, download the webMethods.io report

Valuable Features

Red Hat Fuse offers integration with Camel, easy setup, scalability, cloud compatibility, and efficient deployment across infrastructures.

webMethods.io offers scalable integration, real-time connectivity, and secure, user-friendly API management for efficient enterprise workflow and system connectivity.

Red Hat Fuse was the integration system, and it has many ways for traceability, which is a key point.

Luis Arce

Technology Manager at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Fuse report

If we want to make a REST API, SOAP, REST, or any other type, all kinds of things are put in one box and we can make anything we want to.

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.

Samer Ghanim

Information Technology Specialist at PACI

I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.

ZiyadThaher

Sales Director at Proven Consult

For more quotes and insights, download the webMethods.io report

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Fuse

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Red Hat Fuse is 6.7%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 9.7%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	9.7%
Red Hat Fuse	6.7%
Other	83.6%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Luis Arce

Technology Manager at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Long-term integrations have improved performance and support critical business processes

The downsides of Red Hat Fuse that I encountered were related to the Java virtual machine I worked with, which was Oracle, as the client did not create good services. In the integration, they had many steps with a loop and several bad uses of the integration with many steps and a bad pattern of design. That was the problem, and then I resolved that. The user interface is not good, and it is a very technical tool. In comparison with other tools such as Oracle Integration Cloud or Oracle BPEL, Red Hat Fuse is more complex. However, the integration in low code is more simple because there is the possibility to create services directly in Java and call them at a high level from Apache Camel and expose them with Red Hat Fuse.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Andhika Sotax

Works at Nuvision Consulting

Jan 26, 2022

What are pros and cons of Red Hat Fuse vs webMethods Integration Server?

See 2 answers

Dave Koffij

Information Technology Architect, Cloud and Security at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jul 29, 2021

With webMethods Integration Server, you have the power to connect anything faster, thanks to open, standards-based integration. Make custom, packaged and mainframe applications and databases—on-premises and in the cloud—interoperable and assure the fluid flow of data across your automated processes. Mapping and transformation functions are built-in. pro's; Easy scalability, 300+ connectors, Faster integrations, "Lift & shift" integrations, Mapping and transformation & iPaaS integrations in the cloud Where Red Hat Fuse, pros; Hybrid deployment, Built-in iPaaS with low-code UI/UX, Container-based integration & Integration everywhere supporting 200 included connectors. Red Hat Fuse, based on open source communities like Apache Camel and Apache ActiveMQ, is part of an agile integration solution. Its distributed approach allows teams to deploy integrated services where required. The API-centric, container-based architecture decouples services so they can be created, extended, and deployed independently.

Read full answer

PaulPerez

Integration Architect at Pymma consulting

Jan 26, 2022

Hello Andhika Please read Dave's reply first and understand that WebMethods offers many features that you will not find in RedHat Fuse. I would like to add one more architectural point of view. WebMethods provides a nice business process engine that helps you orchestrate your services. Fuse is not able to provide this kind of service. If your processes are simple and map information, for example, use Fuse. If your business processes are complex and require balancing, I recommend an integration tool with a business process engine (BPEL or BPMN). WebMethods, Oracle SOA Suite or OpenESB offer these types of tools. If you plan to design complex processes, you should not hesitate to choose WebMethods.

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Fuse?

I think the pricing for Red Hat Fuse is okay; it's not expensive, and the support is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Fuse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Fuse?

My use cases for Red Hat Fuse include using Drools to create a bunch of rules for the Finance Ministry in Chile many years ago. I worked with another enterprise named Aguas Andinas, which is a very...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 28% of the time

JBoss ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 15% of the time

Mule ESB vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 14% of the time

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 12% of the time

FioranoMQ vs Red Hat Fuse

Compared 6% of the time

More Red Hat Fuse Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Fuse

December 2025

Download Red Hat Fuse product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

December 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

Fuse ESB, FuseSource

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

Red Hat

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.