ZAPTEST and ReadyAPI compete in the software testing tools category. ZAPTEST gains an advantage with its pricing and customer support, while ReadyAPI holds an edge with its feature richness, which many find worth its cost.
Features: ZAPTEST provides extensive cross-platform support, automation capabilities, and is ideal for end-to-end testing. It offers the ability to automate tests quickly and provides stable results. ReadyAPI allows comprehensive API testing and provides tools for monitoring, debugging, and load testing. It is known for user-friendliness and integration capabilities, supporting various APIs and simplifying test design.
Room for Improvement: ZAPTEST could benefit from enhancing its API-specific functions and further expanding its documentation resources. Additionally, improvements in interface design could make it even more intuitive. ReadyAPI can improve its customer support responsiveness and reduce dependency on documentation. Enhanced user interface elements could further simplify user interactions, and better pricing models might make it more accessible to smaller teams.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ZAPTEST boasts a straightforward deployment process and excellent customer service responsiveness, making user experiences smooth and supportive. ReadyAPI offers a well-documented deployment model, but its customer support may feel lacking, relying heavily on documentation. It prioritizes self-service, potentially posing challenges for users seeking quick assistance.
Pricing and ROI: ZAPTEST offers competitive pricing, providing scalable ROI opportunities due to its wide application range, making it a budget-friendly option. ReadyAPI incurs higher initial setup costs, with the investment justified by its advanced API testing features. Its pricing aligns with deeper functional capabilities, addressing specific API-heavy needs.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
