We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI and StresStimulus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools."
"The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client."
"When we are doing API testing we have found it to be very efficient to receive results. Additionally, you are able to do tests directly from the API."
"The initial setup of ReadyAPI is straightforward."
"It's easy to learn how to use it."
"It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools."
"Reporting is more robust than other products because test reports can be exported in multiple ways."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Compared to other tools, there is not a whole lot to Stress Stimulus UI. This makes it easy to use, be it while scripting, executing, or having to train someone new to the team."
"Technical support is great."
"Designed to be a modern testing tool, StresStimulus made it easy for us to upgrade from an older deprecated testing tool and adapt to Agile DevOps testing principles by shifting left with performance testing."
"ReadyAPI could improve by having dynamic validation information."
"The overall scope of this solution is limited and could be improved."
"There are lots of options within the solution, however they are not upfront or user-friendly."
"I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution."
"To generate a test suite in API, I had to create a separate one each time because otherwise it was just override the test. Each API had to be added separately. I thought I could just have one and then create different methods, but I had to add each API separately to create the test for that. That is an area that could be improved."
"The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."
"I don't like how they don't have a clear way to manage tests between multiple projects."
"They have performance testing also. However, it's not that great."
"StresStimulus has a dedicated blog where users of the tool can log new feature requests or enhancements to existing features."
"We run tests on SQL statements and stored procedures directly, even before integrating with UI. I wish there were a way to connect to my application DB and run SQL queries using a JDBC connection."
"Result analysis (snap-out tabs for side-by-side comparisons) need improvement."
ReadyAPI is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 34 reviews while StresStimulus is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 3 reviews. ReadyAPI is rated 7.8, while StresStimulus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StresStimulus writes "Reliable with excellent support but needs better source control integration and versioning". ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, ReadyAPI Test and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas StresStimulus is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Professional. See our ReadyAPI vs. StresStimulus report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
