

QlikView and Sisense are prominent competitors in the business intelligence software category. Based on feature set and overall usability, Sisense seems to have an advantage due to its user-friendly interface and ease of deployment.
Features: QlikView offers patented AQL™ technology for flexible database interaction and rapid in-memory processing, has a built-in ETL engine that simplifies data modeling, and its dynamic dashboards provide quick insights. Sisense excels in handling large datasets efficiently, integrates multiple data sources with ease, and is preferred for its quick deployment and user-friendly interface.
Room for Improvement: QlikView has scalability limitations due to RAM constraints, its self-service capabilities need enhancement, and licensing can be complex and restrictive. Sisense could enhance its advanced data connectivity options, improve performance with large complex data models, and expand its visual customization features to enhance user value.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView primarily offers on-premises setups and a robust support community but depends on partners for initial service. Its customer support has mixed reviews, with some users relying heavily on community forums. Sisense provides both on-premises and cloud setups and is recognized for ease of deployment and responsive support, with users appreciating swift responses and comprehensive documentation.
Pricing and ROI: QlikView's pricing model is complex and often high, creating a potential barrier for small businesses, although many users find the ROI justified due to its robust capabilities. Sisense is also considered expensive, especially for smaller companies, but its subscription model and ease of use present a compelling ROI, appealing to those seeking rapid deployment and operational efficiency.
The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.
Due to the data presented to stakeholders, they are able to make informed decisions that impact the day-to-day operations of the client, giving them more insights into what's happening within their organization.
I have seen a return on investment, as Sisense has reduced the time for obtaining complex reports from various data sources and controls multiple formats.
I have seen a return on investment in that we can manage the Sisense environment with a very small number of users.
I would rate the customer support a solid 10.
I am totally satisfied with technical support from Qlik.
The support was very good.
We typically get responses within 24 hours.
Sisense customer support has been top-notch, great, and very responsive.
If you want better performance with a larger volume of data, you can simply add an additional server.
It is scalable to a very large extent and we can integrate any third-party tools.
Sisense works really well for simple to medium use cases and scales well.
Sisense's scalability is impressive, as it can ingest millions of data and handle it efficiently.
Sisense is very stable and can handle a large amount of data quickly.
AI features are already available in Qlik Sense, so you would need to migrate to that platform.
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.
I give Sisense a nine because the integration with some third-party tools is good.
I would like to see an improvement in the live data connection, specifically making the process faster.
Sisense is easy to set up and connect to various formats and platforms, but it could improve its management strategy for dashboards created by multiple users, reducing complexity and enhancing security.
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.
I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.
There was no significant difference in pricing between Sisense and ThoughtSpot.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that pricing is a little bit higher when compared to other applications, but that justifies the use case.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been positive, as the price is relatively affordable compared to other solutions.
The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.
Data integration capabilities are quite good; you can integrate any information stored anywhere in different systems with QlikView.
Sisense has positively impacted my organization by drastically reducing the time taken to build the data cube, and we can see real-time analytics.
It allows the user to cater to different use cases and is a very fast aggregator across different data sources, giving you the historical context and helping in operationalizing your data.
It offers two ways to access data: by cubing the data or hitting it live.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| QlikView | 4.0% |
| Sisense | 2.1% |
| Other | 93.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 73 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 76 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.
Sisense is an end-to-end business analytics software that enables users to easily prepare and analyze large, complex datasets. Sisense’s Single-Stack BI software includes data preparation, data management, analysis, visualization and reporting capabilities.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.