We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and TestProject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Sauce Labs and others in Test Automation Tools."Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."
"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
"The automation and AI are very good."
"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."
"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 20th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while TestProject is ranked 18th in Test Automation Tools with 3 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0, while TestProject is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "Open-source with good reporting but needs to offer better performance". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, ReadyAPI Test, Coverity and Tricentis Tosca, whereas TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, LambdaTest and BrowserStack.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
