Oracle VM VirtualBox vs RHEV comparison

Oracle and Red Hat are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while Red Hat is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 5.6% mindshare in SVS, compared to Red Hat’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Oracle VM VirtualBox

Read 65 Oracle VM VirtualBox reviews

7,880 Views
7,013 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

RHEV

Read 37 RHEV reviews

3,668 Views
3,631 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Oracle VM VirtualBox

RHEV

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

RHEV and Oracle VM VirtualBox are two competing products in the virtualization market. RHEV holds an edge in enterprise settings due to its integration capabilities and stability, whereas Oracle VM VirtualBox is preferred for flexibility and ease of use.

Features: RHEV is recognized for its robust management capabilities, high compatibility with enterprise systems, and it supports up to 160 cores and up to 2 TB RAM, making it suitable for extensive IT needs. Oracle VM VirtualBox allows for broad Operating System compatibility, a straightforward setup for creating VLANs and interface groups, and supports sharing of USB devices between host and VMs.

Room for Improvement: RHEV could improve in reducing setup complexities and making high-level features more accessible to smaller businesses. It might also benefit from a more intuitive interface and broader community support. Oracle VM VirtualBox could enhance its performance on high-demand systems and refine its support for more complex enterprise-level operations. Its interface could be updated to cater to more advanced needs, and official support options could be expanded beyond community forums.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEV offers an extensive but more involved deployment process, supported by strong customer service ideal for enterprises. Oracle VM VirtualBox stands out with its straightforward deployment process, requiring minimal configuration and offering community-based customer support, which increases accessibility for smaller organizations and individual users.

Pricing and ROI: RHEV tends to have higher initial setup costs due to its focus on enterprise-grade infrastructure, offering significant ROI for businesses with rigorous virtualization needs. Oracle VM VirtualBox is free, making it a cost-effective solution for smaller operations, offering good ROI by minimizing upfront expenses and maintaining essential features without added costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,011 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle VM VirtualBox

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RHEV

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Oracle VM VirtualBox is 5.6%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RHEV is 2.4%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle VM VirtualBox	5.6%
RHEV	2.4%
Other	92.0%

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Tanvir Siddique

Technical Officer at ADN Telecom

Easily accesses open solutions with seamless compatibility for testing and development

The most valuable feature is the seamlessness. When I install a Linux operating system, I can use Windows applications through Oracle VM VirtualBox seamlessly. There are many applications that work only on Windows. For desktop testing purposes, I used Oracle VM VirtualBox, and it works fine. The guest OS compatibility was tremendous because I used Oracle VM VirtualBox on Linux and ran Windows applications on top of that, working seamlessly.

Read full review

Mike Neuliep

Linux Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Has supported virtualization projects in side jobs but has required workarounds due to lack of maintenance

In my opinion, the best features of RHEV are that it is a real hypervisor and it is free, so it performs better than VMware. I have used the live migration feature in the past with RHEV. There is a free clone of it that is based on the open source. Live migration is a nifty feature if your app is not highly available and you need to do maintenance on a machine. You can migrate the VM off of it, do your maintenance, and move it back when you are done. RHEV has a high availability architecture with a built-in monitoring feature where you could see machines other than the one you are operating on. I tend to implement high availability not so much in RHEV, but by using standard application high availability strategies. Red Hat has another product specifically for high availability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very convenient and easy to use."

"The installation is easy."

"The pause feature is valuable. I can pause, which is something that not all hypervisors allow. The snapshot feature is also valuable."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the ability to manage multiple operating systems through one application."

"The solution is very stable."

"The cloning is a very useful tool."

"The good thing is that it is multi-platform. Once you create a virtual machine in one particular environment, you can switch over to see if you can run it in other environments. For example, if you are on Windows and you create this virtual machine, you can actually go ahead and change the operating system. You can switch it over to Linux or Mac OS and see if you can run the VirtualBox on those particular machines. It even runs on some of the commercial operating systems that are not mainstream, such as Solaris and BSD. These kinds of operating systems are also supported by VirtualBox. The other thing that is good about VirtualBox is that it is open source. So, if you need to do any modifications for your own purposes, you can just download the source, modify it, and deploy it in your environment. It is pretty good and very versatile. You can create and manipulate virtual machines from the command line, which is also very important. It's something that some other products on the desktop side do not have. VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop don't have a good command-line interface to create and manipulate virtual machines, whereas VirtualBox has it out of the box, which is pretty good."

"The product is very easy to use."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox pros

"What they provide is way beyond the essential requirements of customers."

"It is a scalable solution."

"We find the ease of use of this solution to be invaluable. It is user-friendly and integrates well with other software."

"The solution is stable."

"In my opinion, the best features of RHEV are that it is a real hypervisor and it is free, so it performs better than VMware."

"The solution is a great all-round product. The virtualization is especially good."

"When you purchase RHEV, you are essentially buying a subscription license. This license can be integrated with various client types, including these integrations with the subscription."

"The platform is scalable, allowing for the installation of multiple nodes."

More RHEV pros

Cons

"It has some issues when you have some weird device drivers. For instance, when you have a weird sound driver working on your machine, and the VirtualBox needs to output the sound of the virtual machine into the sound driver of the physical machine, the bare metal, it doesn't work too well. If you tweak lots of drivers and play around with the different kinds of drivers and machines, you will probably break something. I have not played with it too much and maybe it already supports it, but it would probably be good to have the ability to use a container from the virtual machine environment instead of spinning off a complete virtual machine. There are other tools for that. On Linux, you have a DXE, LXC framework, and you have Docker as well. Docker is good because it is multi-platform, and you can run Docker on pretty much anything, even different processors, but it would be good if we had a VirtualBox running on it while spinning off containers instead of full virtual machines. The other thing that will become important, and I'm pretty sure that they are thinking about it as well is that there's this new hardware platform that Apple is releasing, which is an ARM-based new chip. So, VirtualBox will probably have to work on ARM-based CPUs as well."

"The AI and the UI could be improved. The user interface is a little outdated and the AI is not very attractive."

"There are a few bugs that need to be updated."

"Basically, the GUI and command-line interface need improvement."

"I think that this solution should be more user-friendly."

"The technical support needs to improve."

"Oracle VMs don't have a solid web interface of their own. This is an area where Oracle is lagging behind. Now, we use headless servers, install Oracle VMs, and manage them remotely. We could use phpVirtual Box, but it is a third-party solution. A lot of people contribute to it, and it's not authenticated by Oracle. As a result, I don't find it to be a good option. Therefore, I would like to see Oracle offer an extension pack or a licensed version that fixes this problem."

"The communications setup lags. It does not connect properly so the batching and networking is a bit slow."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox cons

"RHEV is not improving because it has been discontinued. It has been discontinued for years."

"We hope that Red Hat can produce a paradigm edition. We are looking for paradigm computing and paradigm storage. Its scalability can be improved. It is not easy to scale, and we hope that Red Hat can provide a more scalable system. They should also provide local service and support. Our customers are looking for a good software vendor to provide professional services."

"The biggest improvement would be more third-party direct support for things like backups and provisioning through third-party portals."

"With RHEV, the cyberattacks should be fewer. I want RHEV to be better protected."

"It would be better to have more patches, especially kernel-level updates, live and online so that we can keep the business up and running during this period."

"The UI should be more interactive with additional features."

"Specifically, enhancements in managing virtual machine migrations, cloning, and the creation of different VMs could further optimize its functionality."

"A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware."

More RHEV cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is pretty good for the price, which is free."

"The product is free to use."

"Everything is free within limitations. Once you go over a certain level of usage you have to license the product."

"The tool is not as expensive as other products."

"It is a very cost-effective solution."

"The license I use is free."

"There are no licensing fees."

"Pricing does not apply for us, we do not have to pay for the service."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox pricing and cost advice

"We have to pay extra for vulnerability and fault tolerance."

"We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions."

"The solution does not require licencing but a subscription is necessary, which is very affordable."

"The price of RHEV is high. It is an open-source solution, the price should be less. The price should not be on par with a solution, such as VMware. It's not more or equal to VMware, it's less, but the difference should be more substantial."

"I would say the price is acceptable."

"RHEV offers pricing based on a per-physical-machine licensing model."

"Price-wise, RHEV is okay, in my opinion."

"This is an open-source solution."

More RHEV pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)

CIO at Robusta Technology & Training

Jan 13, 2015

vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer

We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

How does KVM compare to Oracle VM VirtualBox?

KVM is easy to use, stable and flexible. It is mature and very fast. It is an affordable open-source solution that is easy to set up and manage. It offers very good security. It has a virtual manag...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle VM VirtualBox?

The product’s most valuable feature is the ability to manage multiple operating systems through one application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle VM VirtualBox?

Maintenance is not necessary because I did not use it for heavy loads.

See all answers

What do you like most about RHEV?

The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?

It's the open source. There's not much cost. It's very minimal comparably. Compared to what I am paying for VMware, it's negligible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RHEV?

RHEV is not improving because it has been discontinued. It has been discontinued for years. I would love to get back into RHEV, but the job market is difficult and no one is hiring. RHEV is designe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 36% of the time

KVM vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Workstation vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 14% of the time

Hyper-V vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 13% of the time

More Oracle VM VirtualBox Competitors

Proxmox VE vs RHEV

Compared 26% of the time

VMware vSphere vs RHEV

Compared 23% of the time

Hyper-V vs RHEV

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle VM vs RHEV

Compared 9% of the time

More RHEV Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM VirtualBox

February 2026

Download Oracle VM VirtualBox product report

Buyer's Guide

RHEV

February 2026

Download RHEV product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization

Overview

Oracle VM VirtualBox is a robust AMD64/Intel64 and x86 next-generation virtualization solution that functions well for home use and is also powerful enough to handle the needs of a busy enterprise organization. This professional solution is open source and provides super-fast high performance in addition to many outstanding value-added features. VirtualBox functions effectively on Windows, macOS, Solaris, Linux, and more. Users can benefit from VirtualBox's dedication to continually developing the product and providing continual progressive updates and releases. The solution is supported by a trusted dedicated professional community and is backed by Oracle, which guarantees that the product is able to consistently meet and exceed quality controls and protocols at all times.

Oracle VM VirtualBox Features

Oracle VM Virtual Box provides many value-added features. Some of these features include:

Consolidation: Oracle VM VirtualBox makes it easy for users to seamlessly run numerous virtual machines on a small number of hosts and will also facilitate comprehensive balancing of the loads between VMs. This helps to minimize and consolidate the hardware needed throughout the organization.
Diagnostics: VirtualBox provides excellent testing and disaster recovery. Users can use the virtual hard disk like a container. This container can be copied, frozen, backed up, or transported between hosts. Using the virtual machines (VMs), users can easily test multi-node network services for any networking, software configuration, or operating system issues.
Snapshots: Using snapshots, users are able to save or freeze a specific state of a VM and choose to revert back to the protected state if/when they desire. Users are able to make changes or experiment within the computing space. Should a problem arise, users can revert back to the selected snapshot; this makes the need for frequent backups and restores unnecessary.
Flexibility: The solution makes it easy to run different operating systems (OSes) at the same time. Users can run software designed for one OS on another OS. For example, users can easily run Windows on a MAC and not have to perform a reboot. As users can configure the kinds of virtual hardware to be presented with each OS, there is greater flexibility on which OS can be selected, and users can even choose older OSes or ones that are not currently supported by the original OS.
Cost-effective: Virtualization with Oracle VM VirtualBox enables users to considerably minimize overall costs by reducing the amount of hardware needed and the associated expenses of running the physical machines throughout an organization. This tremendous cost savings results in ROI being achieved in a very short period of time.

Reviews from Real Users

“Oracle VM VirtualBox is easy to use and does not require much training. It uses fewer resources. Teams using new operating system releases can quickly test and implement. This would make the development of new software releases faster and easier. It also helps users to write the program, test, and support it on multiple platforms. It has a good community as it is open-source.” - Satishbabu G., Oracle ACE

“It is easy to use and does not require complex knowledge. It uses less resources, which is a requirement as it is used to onboard hardware with very little resources available.” - A PeerSpot user who is an IT Architect - AI at CGI

Oracle

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.

Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Airbus, Colorado State University, SCS Africa, Wolf Medical Systems.

Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV

February 2026

Free Report: Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.