Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle E-Business Suite vs QAD Enterprise Applications comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle E-Business Suite
Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
156
Ranking in other categories
Field Service Management (1st), ERP (4th), Benefits Administration (6th), Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing (1st), Product Configuration and Quoting (2nd)
QAD Enterprise Applications
Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Demand Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Activity Based Costing Software category, the mindshare of Oracle E-Business Suite is 16.5%, down from 17.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QAD Enterprise Applications is 2.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Activity Based Costing Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Oracle E-Business Suite16.5%
QAD Enterprise Applications2.9%
Other80.6%
Activity Based Costing Software
 

Featured Reviews

Md. Mazharul Islam - PeerSpot reviewer
Incharge Corporate Accounts & ERP System at General Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Has connected financial data across departments and improved future cash flow planning
I would like to improve the integration with other solutions, as I need everything integrated, like the HR module, purchase module, SCM, production, and engineering. Each and every module should be connected to the finance module, and I think Oracle provides the right solution. Also, SAP, IFS, or Microsoft Dynamics 365 offer some solutions, but I am not as happy with them as I am with Oracle. I believe that Oracle E-Business Suite could improve by transitioning from Java-based scripts in our system to a web-based environment. While Oracle already has JD Edwards available in web-based format, I think it needs to be smoother for optimization and presentation in the future. In comparison, IFS is fully web-based, and all applications are sufficiently good and user-friendly. We are developing and trying to improve to a web-based setup, but it is currently too costly.
Use QAD Enterprise Applications?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Activity Based Costing Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise33
Large Enterprise113
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle E-Business Suite?
It was very easy to integrate the product into our existing infrastructure.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle E-Business Suite?
I find the pricing is not ideal for a smaller organization right now.
What needs improvement with Oracle E-Business Suite?
I would like to improve the integration with other solutions, as I need everything integrated, like the HR module, purchase module, SCM, production, and engineering. Each and every module should be...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Oracle EBS, OEBS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Colab, Portobello, Saudi Telecom Company, DG Khan Cement, Dubai Holding
Vitatech
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, NetSuite and others in Activity Based Costing Software. Updated: January 2026.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.