Oracle BPEL vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

Oracle and VMware are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Oracle is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.7, while VMware is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Oracle holds a 0.6% mindshare in PA, compared to VMware’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Oracle BPEL

Read 4 Oracle BPEL reviews

530 Views
72 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

vCenter Orchestrator

Read 50 vCenter Orchestrator reviews

151 Views
84 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

vCenter Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

vCenter Orchestrator and Oracle BPEL are competing in the orchestration landscape. vCenter Orchestrator has an advantage in VMware integration, while Oracle BPEL offers broader process orchestration capabilities.

Features: vCenter Orchestrator offers easy automation of repetitive tasks, deep integration with VMware products, and extensive third-party plug-in support. Oracle BPEL provides comprehensive process orchestration, scalable architecture, and strong enterprise integration support.

Room for Improvement: vCenter Orchestrator could enhance its support for non-VMware environments, improve complex process orchestration capabilities, and expand its feature set. Oracle BPEL may benefit from simplifying its initial configuration, reducing long-term costs, and improving user interface simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: vCenter Orchestrator deployment is straightforward within VMware environments, with robust community support for issue resolution. Oracle BPEL requires more initial setup but excels with tailored solutions supported by Oracle's extensive documentation and network.

Pricing and ROI: vCenter Orchestrator generally offers lower initial costs with substantial ROI in VMware-centric setups. Oracle BPEL's higher setup costs may impact short-term ROI, but its expansive capabilities provide long-term benefits in diverse IT ecosystems.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPEL vs. vCenter Orchestrator Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPEL vs. vCenter Orchestrator

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

vCenter Orchestrator

Ranking in Process Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vCenter Orchestrator is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Posham Nampelli

Architecture and Consulting at Synaptics Inc

A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes

I'm a consultant. I do architecting, designing, and development. I have used two versions, 1.1 and 2.0. I’m unsure about the prices because I oversee the development and implementation. I'll highly recommend the product depending on an organization’s requirements. As someone who has worked with BPEL for 13 years, I highly recommend the product for an on-premise or hybrid integration. Multiple products or alternate solutions have come into the integration domain. However, the product has been in the industry from SOA 11g to SOA 12c and OIC. Though there are multiple competitors, the product has been here for a long time and has been helping multiple customers improve their business. Overall, I rate the solution a nine or nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Gerhard Gmelch

IT architect endpoint at Rohde & Schwarz

Enhance automation efficiency with cost-effective graphical workflow design

I use vCenter Orchestrator for automation purposes, specifically to run automation workbooks The most valuable features are the graphical UI for designing the workflows and the interfaces that come out of the box. Additionally, it is included in the VMware Vitalization Stack, which means there…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

"The product has everything we need."

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

"The stability of the product is very good."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its good automation features."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"Snapshots and similar features were managed well."

"If I need to do DR, VMware can enable me to use vMotion, which requires use of vCenter. You cannot do vMotion without vCenter. We do a lot of automation, orchestration, and simplification for that purpose."

"The solution was easy to install."

"We have excellent technical support. They have always been helpful when we have needed them."

"The most valuable feature is that it's simple and very ergonomic to use the product compared to other virtualizing product. Out of Microsoft, Red Hat, and IBM, we found VMware to be the best one."

More vCenter Orchestrator pros

Cons

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"The custom workflows are very difficult and confusing."

"It could be integrated with third-party hypervisors."

"As we work towards more stability on the solution, sometimes we'll try something and it breaks and it's easier to restart the service. That's the only drawback. We've experienced this with other applications as well."

"The solution has a limited count of parallel executions, which can be a bottleneck for larger environments."

"The solution needs to integrate with Cloud facilities like AWS and Azure."

"The solution's price could be cheaper."

"The only problem with the product is that it is very expensive, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The GUI should be enhanced in the future."

More vCenter Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is moderately priced."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

"The price is reasonable, and one of the reasons that this product was selected."

"vCenter Orchestrator could be more affordable."

"We pay a yearly fee, based on our entries."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"My organization didn't have to pay extra for vCenter Orchestrator. It was already included, so it's basically free. Even VMware regular support is included."

"We provide the VMware solution to our clients, for which they pay a perpetual license."

"The licensing module is somewhat complex. Calculating the cost is complicated. Many of our clients are unclear about the billing system and the traffic metering."

"I rate the product price a seven to eight out of ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

More vCenter Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle BPEL?

The product has everything we need.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

See all answers

What do you like most about vCenter Orchestrator?

The stability of the product is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vCenter Orchestrator?

We're running a low-profile budget. This is not our main focus on investment technology, so we're trying to reduce costs due to the change from perpetual to subscription licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vCenter Orchestrator?

After the change from perpetual licensing to subscriptions, the cost model changed. We are considering alternatives since we lost the perpetual aspect, and support is changing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 44% of the time

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 35% of the time

Bonita vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 21% of the time

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 50% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 23% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

More vCenter Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

June 2025

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Buyer's Guide

vCenter Orchestrator

May 2025

Download vCenter Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

BPEL Process Manager

No data available

Overview

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.

VMware

Sample Customers

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Beiersdorf Shared Services

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPEL vs. vCenter Orchestrator

June 2025

Free Report: Oracle BPEL vs. vCenter Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPEL vs. vCenter Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BPEL vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.