We performed a comparison between Oracle BPEL and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has everything we need."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"If I need to do DR, VMware can enable me to use vMotion, which requires use of vCenter. You cannot do vMotion without vCenter. We do a lot of automation, orchestration, and simplification for that purpose."
"The storage motion is a good feature. It is a very good tool."
"The most valuable feature for us is the performance stability of vCenter Orchestrator, especially in complex situations, making it excellent for managing virtual machines."
"Because of the central management, the scripting engine and workflow engine are integrated with VMware without any burden to integrate different products."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The product's integration is good, it works well with other programs and solutions."
"I like the tool's DNS feature."
"We can scale the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"There can be compatibility issues."
"The scalability option provided by the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The price of this product is high and could be improved."
"It is practically difficult at this stage to really comment on the improvisations of V central. But more tech events and PoC cases would help the EA to design better solutions and utilization."
"The snapshot technology of VMware is not good compared to other solutions in the market, like Nutanix."
"The response time of vCenter Orchestrator's support could be improved."
"The solution's price could be cheaper."
"I liked the previous client better than the current web client of vCenter Orchestrator, though my colleagues like the client now. The technical support for vCenter Orchestrator needs improvement."
Oracle BPEL is ranked 18th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda and BizTalk Server, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Oracle BPEL vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
