No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Web CMS vs Oracle WebCenter comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Web CMS
Ranking in Web Content Management
16th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle WebCenter
Ranking in Web Content Management
14th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Customer Experience Management (17th), Enterprise Content Management (21st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Web CMS is 2.2%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle WebCenter is 3.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle WebCenter3.3%
OpenText Web CMS2.2%
Other94.5%
Web Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user114849 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Difficult to use but a flexible solution.
Teamsite LiveSite Mediabin connector OpenDeploy/DD Dynamic Content publishing Custom Workflow development and publishing lifecycle As much as it's flexible to use, it is equally hard to use. 5+ years Unique at each client based on their install base on how they use it. So we have had…
reviewer2105979 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Vice President - Head Digital Partnership and Alliances at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Has a user-friendly interface but performance is not up to scratch
I mainly use WebCenter for content management and publishing WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly. WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system. Its performance is also not up to the market standard, and its agility and adaptability could be improved.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Customer Service: Good. Technical Support: Good."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"Overall, this is a very good solution and other than the support for the Arabic translation, I cannot think of additional features that I would like at the moment."
"In terms of scalability, it is easy to scale."
"These features are great components in WebCenter Collaboration for presenting various middleware and ECM functionalities to the end user in a single portal application."
"The main feature and idea of dynamically creating navigation, pages and portals are overall good and very valuable."
"The solution is completely scalable and one of the best Oracle tools in my opinion."
 

Cons

"As much as it's flexible to use, it is equally hard to use."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"We have a lot of pain with instabilities and are not getting enough support from Oracle."
"Rules for contents personalization, workflows, publishing content, and the satellite cache all have room for improvement!"
"Initial setup was simple for standard things, but for customisation and third-party integration, it can get cumbersome."
"Some parts of the product seemed to be unstable; various exceptions which lead to reaching out for Oracle support."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."
"The price needs to be lowered."
"The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise10
 

Also Known As

Autonomy TeamSite, HP Autonomy TeamSite
WebCenter, FatWire
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, Microsoft, Wordpress and others in Web Content Management. Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.