OpenText UFT One vs Qualitia Automation Studio comparison

OpenText and Qualitia Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Qualitia Software is ranked #33. OpenText holds a 10.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qualitia Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qualitia Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

7,434 Views
4,702 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Qualitia Automation Studio

Read 5 Qualitia Automation Studio reviews

209 Views
89 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Qualitia Automation Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Qualitia Automation Studio are both prominent in the realm of automation testing tools. OpenText UFT One seems to have the upper hand due to its broader support for testing environments, but Qualitia Automation Studio is preferred for its user-friendly approach, making automation accessible for diverse team skills.

Features: OpenText UFT One supports a wide range of applications and technologies, making it suitable for complex testing environments. It also offers robust integration capabilities, ensuring comprehensive testing solutions for varied scenarios. Qualitia Automation Studio's intuitive automation framework simplifies test creation and maintenance, promoting efficiency in test script generation. Additionally, it attracts teams with its user-friendly test automation setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One has a sophisticated deployment model tailored for various enterprise needs, which may involve a steeper learning curve. Qualitia Automation Studio provides a straightforward deployment process, focusing on ease of use and rapid onboarding. OpenText UFT One offers comprehensive customer support ideal for large organizations, while Qualitia Automation Studio emphasizes swift, user-centric support for faster issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One requires a significant initial investment, delivering substantial ROI for large-scale projects owing to its extensive capabilities. Qualitia Automation Studio presents competitive pricing, appealing to organizations that look for cost-effectiveness. Its lower setup cost and ease of use contribute to a quicker ROI, especially beneficial for smaller to mid-sized projects.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Qualitia Automation Studio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Qualitia Automation Studio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Qualitia Automation Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.0%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualitia Automation Studio is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

it_user189918

QA Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Good Tool for Non Technical Users.

I think Qualitia's scriptless test automation tool is best used on teams that have Manual QA Testers who are looking to start to automate regression tests but are not very technical in nature. I think recognizing the overall strategy of implementing a test automation solution is extremely important when choosing a tool. If the tests are just going to be run from a local machine, then maybe a full solution like this is not what you need. But if you want to run tests on different servers and have them included in your build process, then a solution like Qualitia would help your team out. Just remember that Qualitia's technical support team is really something that will set their product apart from other similar solutions. They really do care about their customers success.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stop automation is a great feature."

"The shared repositories can be used throughout all testing which makes jobs easier."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"I find UFT One to be very good for thick clients, which are non-browser applications."

"It is very simple to use, and the scripting language is even easier."

"The most valuable features are its support for multiple technologies, ease of coding, object repository, and ability to design our own framework. The recording playback feature allows those unfamiliar with coding to use the tool."

"Automation of tests is done very fast with UFT One."

"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."

More OpenText UFT One pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."

Cons

"We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes."

"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."

"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."

"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."

"[Tech support is] not a 10 because what happens with some of our issues is that we might not get a patch quickly and we have to hold on to an application until we get a proper solution."

"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."

"It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this."

"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts."

More OpenText UFT One cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"The price is reasonable."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"The tool's price is high."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

23%

Insurance Company

21%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

OpenText UFT One required knowledge of VBScript, which is a limited version of Visual Basic. We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Qualitia Automation Studio

Compared 100% of the time

More Qualitia Automation Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

April 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

April 2025

Download Qualitia Automation Studio product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Qualitia gives you simple step wise approach to quickly build your test automation and handle complexities easily with its unique scriptless approach. Qualitia gives you smart alerts and analysis to adopt changes effectively, making it agile friendly.

Qualitia Software

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Qualitia Automation Studio

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Qualitia Automation Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Qualitia Automation Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT One vs. Qualitia Automation Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.