OpenText UFT Developer vs Sahi Pro comparison

"It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry."

"The solution helps to accelerate software testing automation. It will help to reduce lead time and increase productivity and efficiency."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT Developer is the flexibility to work with many different types of software."

"It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE."

"The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local."

"The cost is the most important factor in this tool."

"There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership."

"One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library."

"There are many features that are very easy to use, such as the identification of commands."

"The tool could be a little easier."

"With Smart Bear products generally, you can have only one instance of the tool running on a machine."

"It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding."

"The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years."

"The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added."

"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."

"There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad."

"Sahi Pro can improve the transformation process."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"Sahi Pro is priced well."