OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Windev comparison

OpenText and PC SOFT are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while PC SOFT is ranked #36. OpenText holds a 6.0% mindshare in ALM, compared to PC SOFT’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

3,879 Views
3,685 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Windev

102 Views
102 Comparison Views

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Windev

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management and Windev compete in software development and delivery. Windev holds an advantage in feature richness, appealing to users seeking comprehensive functionalities. In contrast, OpenText Software Delivery Management stands out with cost-effectiveness and robust customer support, making it highly competitive in pricing and support aspects.

Features: OpenText Software Delivery Management provides collaborative planning tools and effective integration capabilities. Windev offers a comprehensive development environment supporting rapid application development. OpenText simplifies workflow streamlining, while Windev provides extensive capabilities with multiple platform outputs and a rich feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Software Delivery Management offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support, ensuring a smooth transition. Windev allows flexible deployment, yet may not match OpenText in immediate customer support. OpenText's superior customer service is appealing to organizations seeking reliability.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Software Delivery Management is known for competitive pricing with lower setup costs, translating to better ROI for budget-conscious buyers. Windev, despite higher initial costs, delivers substantial ROI due to its extensive feature set. OpenText is preferred for cost-driven investments, whereas Windev attracts those prioritizing functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (7th)

Windev

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

36th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 6.0%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windev is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

Use Windev?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

June 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

July 2025

Download Windev product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

No data available

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Windev is acclaimed for its robust integrated development environment, streamlining application development across various platforms, including mobile and web. It excels in rapid prototyping, data management, and reporting, making it ideal for complex business applications. Key features like HyperFileSQL database and user-friendly GUI tools enhance productivity, while strong community support and thorough documentation facilitate learning and problem-solving, significantly boosting organizational efficiency and workflow.

PC SOFT

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.