OpenText Silk Test vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,629 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Testim are competing products in the test automation domain. Despite positive notes on OpenText Silk Test's pricing and support, Testim appears superior due to its advanced features, which customers find worth the cost.

Features: OpenText Silk Test provides robust cross-browser testing capabilities, supports a variety of scripting languages, and offers a comprehensive object-oriented approach to accommodate different testing environments. In contrast, Testim focuses on AI-driven testing that enhances test creation and maintains efficiency. Its user interface is simple and allows for easy automation using record and playback, not requiring extensive coding knowledge. Testim’s AI features further bolster its position in terms of adaptability and innovation.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could enhance its cloud-based capabilities to allow for more modern deployment models and simplify its integration with various development environments. Improving real-time analytics and dashboard functionalities would also be beneficial. Testim, on the other hand, can work on enhancing its script management and expanding its integrations with additional DevOps tools. A deeper customization for its AI-driven testing can also be improved to cater to more specific client needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test offers a comprehensive setup that suits larger enterprises and is linked with strong customer service. However, its deployment process can be more complex. Testim delivers a streamlined cloud-based deployment model that simplifies onboarding and integrates rapidly with existing workflows. This modern deployment approach, along with efficient customer service, gives Testim an edge in ease of deployment and overall support experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test's pricing strategy offers a traditional licensing model, providing a cost-efficient entry point for companies heavily investing in extensive test environments, ensuring long-term ROI. Conversely, Testim's subscription-based pricing might result in higher initial costs but often facilitates faster ROI due to reduced setup time and maintenance needs, making it attractive for agile teams seeking quick returns.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Testim Report (Updated: April 2025).

OpenText Silk Test vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (8th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

SrinivasPakala

Director Consulting Expert at Cgi Deutschland KG

Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available

While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes, and if they are new, we'll do lots and lots of interpretation and analysis across various servers, to look at response times, and impact. For example, whatever the observations we had during the test, we need to implement it. We'll have to help to catch what exactly is the issues were, and we'll help to see how they can be reduced. Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are. The solution needs better monitoring, especially of CPU.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The pricing could be improved."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText Silk Test

Comparisons

Compared 51% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 14% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 12% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 49% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 13% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Silk Test

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

OpenText Silk Test vs. Testim