OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. OpenText is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.3. OpenText holds a 2.1% mindshare in PPM, compared to Oracle’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

854 Views
401 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Read 8 Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management reviews

930 Views
419 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 18, 2025

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management are competing in the portfolio management category. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management edges ahead in terms of pricing and support, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is considered superior due to its robust feature set.

Features: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides comprehensive task management, collaboration tools, and integration options. It offers real-time visibility into projects and seamless integration with tools like Jira and Agile Manager. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is known for advanced analytics, scheduling capabilities, and a strong project portfolio dashboard. It excels in cost and work breakdown structures and integrates easily with baseline analysis for delay analysis.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management can improve its advanced analytics tools and optimize for larger enterprise implementations. Enhancing the customization options and expanding its third-party integrations could add value. For Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, refining the complexity of its user interface and simplifying deployment processes could make it more accessible. Furthermore, providing more flexible reporting tools and enhancing mobile support would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management features a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, aiding in quicker adoption. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, despite a complex deployment, offers an extensive customer service network valuable for large organizations requiring detailed assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers cost-effective solutions with a favorable return on investment. It is often preferred for its affordability. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, with higher setup costs, justifies its pricing through substantial long-term ROI driven by its powerful analytical and optimization features.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is 4.2%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Useful for resource and financial management but needs to change Oracle database

The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet. It includes a Project dashboard for managing multiple projects simultaneously and program management for overseeing groups of projects. It offers various data metrics. It has project entities for controlling risks, issues, and protections. It can calculate costs based on resource tasks and compare actual and planned costs. The tool has features for scenario comparison, allowing us to optimize scenarios based on various factors. Additionally, we can manually optimize by managing resource availability, creating staffing profiles, and making payments to optimize in any situation.

Read full review

ManeshGeorge

Senior Consultant at Aurecon

Efficient project planning with advanced impact and delay analysis features

You need to have a good understanding of project management before you build programs using P6. Learning the tool takes time, so you should spend hands-on time with it while developing your project management skills. It's a mix of hands-on work and project management skills. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data provided by PPM is trusted and is available almost immediately; without trusted data there is very less scope of any tool to be successful."

"Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes."

"Recent Program Management lifecycle, Program Management aggregation views due to interactive UI (selection of risks, issues, and changes in Program Overview) and “flash look & feel" of this functional chunk, which is different in comparison to other parts of HPE PPM."

"Scenario comparison is the feature most valuable to us and the reason why we decided to choose HPE PPM over other portfolio management products."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow."

"I like the ease of customization from an admin perspective. I'm really excited about some of the things that are coming in version 10.0.3 as far as what admins are able to do."

"The portfolio management and the resource management are the key features."

"The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."

"Delay analysis and extension of time claims are some of the key features."

"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure."

"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."

"The solution's tech support is good."

"It is very, very good in planning for large projects."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management pros

Cons

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management should move their database from Oracle."

"User interface continues to be poor. The product does not have a similar view in the different modules, e.g., staffing vs financial management, it looks like you are working with a different product and it is not easy to use or intuitive."

"We constantly put in requests for some of the things we need. One of those is being able to export just our standard request type to PDF."

"They can make its UI better. Currently, the UI is a bit clunky."

"There are some limitations when it comes to attaching receipts. For example, if we are going to buy some non-labor-related assets such as hardware, we are not able to attach the receipts in the Financial Management module in version 9.41."

"The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."

"The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good."

"We had a couple of issues with stability or performance degradation about a year ago, around the time of the initial rollout. Since then, we've only had two unexpected outages that were quickly resolved."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs."

"There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products."

"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."

"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."

"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."

"The solution itself is cost-effective."

"My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Government

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Primavera appears to be more expensive than Microsoft Project but potentially less than Maximo. Pricing details from ten years ago are not committed to memory, and I would have to refer back to doc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs. The software could benefit from enhancements that make it more user-friendly for various tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Smartsheet vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 27% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 25% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 25% of the time

Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 22% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

JIRA Portfolio vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 14% of the time

Jira vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 12% of the time

EcoSys vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 11% of the time

Artemis 7 (A7) vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

August 2025

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

August 2025

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report

Download Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

Primavera Portfolio Management, OPPM

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers trusted data for immediate insights.
Resource Planning: Assists in managing team allocation effectively.
Demand Management: Supports balanced project prioritization.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes to improve efficiency.
Scenario Comparison: Evaluates different project plans for best outcomes.
Financial Oversight: Monitors budgets and financial predictions.

What benefits can organizations expect from OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Utilizes real-time data for better choices.
Improved Integration: Seamless sync with common project tools.
Increased Transparency: Comprehensive reporting capabilities.
Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes resource allocation and utilization.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.

OpenText

Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

Yarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.