We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and OpenText Silk Performer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."We can measure metrics like hits per second and detect deviations or issues through graphs. We can filter out response times based on timings and identify spikes in the database or AWS reports."
"Creating the script is very easy and user friendly."
"The tool is very easy to set up and get running."
"It is mostly user-friendly and usable."
"The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."
"We can book load generators."
"The solution offers helpful guidelines and has good documentation."
"IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."
"A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format."
"After they get over the acquisition, the first improvement is going to be tailoring it for their existing stack of other products. How would LoadRunner work for Documentum? How would it work for Business Network? How would it work for other apps? They can have a pre-package or a guide because they are all in the same family as opposed to being outside."
"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product."
"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise needs to improve reporting."
"The process of upgrading LoadRunner can be difficult and time-consuming."
"Micro Focus's technical support could be more responsive."
"The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools."
"The price of this solution could be less expensive. However, this category of solutions is expensive."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 81 reviews while OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Tricentis NeoLoad, Apache JMeter and OpenText ALM / Quality Center, whereas OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.