OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Sahi Pro comparison

OpenText and Sahi Pro are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 78% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sahi Pro users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 39 OpenText Functional Testing for Developers reviews

1,901 Views
1,654 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Sahi Pro

Read 1 Sahi Pro review

157 Views
141 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Sahi Pro

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Sahi Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (11th)

Sahi Pro

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (17th)

Featured Reviews

Eitan Gold

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

User-friendly integration with support for Visual Studio enhances GUI testing capabilities

OpenText UFT Developer ( /products/opentext-uft-developer-reviews ) is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio. The support is excellent. It is easy to implement tests with OpenText UFT Developer. We primarily use it for GUI testing and testing web applications with another application. This is the main usage for us. We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework ( /products/framework-reviews ), and they work well together.

Read full review

Vipul Saxena

Manager (QA) at PureSoftware Ltd

Easy to deploy, good technical support, and stable

Sahi Pro can improve the transformation process. Suppose we are working in Python and we want to view our code in Python. If the conversion is available, it would be much easier for the user to support Python users, making it a better tool if it can be converted into different languages including Java Script.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly."

"This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us."

"It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE."

"The most valuable features are the object repository."

"OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

"The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local."

"The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pros

"There are many features that are very easy to use, such as the identification of commands."

Cons

"The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years."

"Stability depends on the company's infrastructure and end-to-end infrastructure. When I used the tool in my project, we had a big problem with many users using it simultaneously."

"There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad."

"The pricing could be improved."

"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure."

"UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive."

"Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful."

"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers cons

"Sahi Pro can improve the transformation process."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pricing and cost advice

"Sahi Pro is priced well."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary. This limits the technology's ability to recognize every object.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 50% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

July 2025

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers report

Download OpenText Functional Testing for Developers product report

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

June 2025

Download Sahi Pro product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.

This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?

Complex Algorithm Handling: Manages complex scenarios with ease, including fuzzy logic.
Developer-friendly: Enables coding in C# and Java, integrating seamlessly with popular IDEs.
AI-based Object Recognition: Enhances test automation through advanced object identification.
Extensive Protocol Support: Supports a wide range of protocols for diverse testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Connects effortlessly with ALM and Jenkins, promoting continuous development.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Functional Testing?

Efficient Test Automation: Streamlines test processes, optimizing resource allocation and reducing effort.
Multi-platform Flexibility: Facilitates cross-platform testing, accommodating desktop, web, and banking applications.
Reduced IT Workload: Simplifies automation tasks, decreasing the strain on IT resources.
Enhanced DevOps Support: Integrates well with DevOps practices for continuous testing advancements.

Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.

OpenText

To people who want to spend the least amount of time on test automation setup, we may have exactly what you need. Sahi Pro is arguably the only low-code test automation platform that lets you work with complex test automation scenarios as easily as the simple ones.

Sahi Pro

Sample Customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.