No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] comparison

The compared OpenText and Black Duck solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #3 in DAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 11.3% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.
OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews
  • 3,229 Views
  • 1,195 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd), DevSecOps (8th)
Synopsys API Security Testi...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AP
ArnabPaul
Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Enhancements in manual testing align with reporting and integration features
WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produces minimal findings, necessitating manual verification. The solution offers customization features for crawling and vulnerability detection. It includes various security frameworks and allows selection of specific vulnerability types to audit, such as OWASP Top 10 or JavaScript-based vulnerabilities. When working with APIs, we can select OWASP API Top 10. The tool also supports custom audit features by combining different security frameworks. For on-premises deployment, the setup is complex, particularly regarding SQL server configuration. Unlike Burp Suite or OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, which have simpler setup processes, WebInspect requires SQL server setup to function.
Read full review
UmarQureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
UmarQureshi
Security Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support
We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."
"Fortify WebInspect is a scalable solution, it is good for a lot of applications."
"It is a good product, comparable to AppScan, quite scalable, and offers good cost/value with the support and backing from Micro Focus."
"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features."
"My experience with technical support has been good."
"Easy to scan and then share scan reports, it has definitely streamlined many processes."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros
"The technical support from Synopsys API Security Testing is amazing."
"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."
 

Cons

"The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate."
"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective."
"The first time we ran the module, it was okay, however, the next time we ran it, it almost crashed."
"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."
"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."
"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."
"I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker."
"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons
"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."
"We haven't covered all the areas yet in our business. It's still being scaled up within the organization. We've probably covered 10 percent of the business. I don't think we've seen a proper ROI yet."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It’s a fair price for the solution."
"The price is okay."
"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."
"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."
"This solution is very expensive."
"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."
"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise15
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?
While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?
WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?
I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 23% of the time
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 5% of the time
Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 5% of the time
Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 5% of the time
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors
Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 32% of the time
SonarQube vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
SonarQube vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 30% of the time
Aikido Security vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
Aikido Security vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 21% of the time
Acunetix vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
Acunetix vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 17% of the time
More Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
March 2026
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reportDownload OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
March 2026
Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] reportDownload Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
  • Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
  • Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
  • Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.
What benefits should users expect from reviews?
  • Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
  • Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
  • Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
  • Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

Black Duck
 

Sample Customers

Aaron's
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
March 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.