Invicti Web + API vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Additionally, 89% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.

Invicti Web + API

Read 36 Invicti Web + API reviews

12,369 Views
6,308 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Synopsys API Security Testi...

Read 1 Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Invicti Web + API

Synopsys API Security Testi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Acunetix and Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] are competitors in the API security testing market. Although Acunetix offers attractive pricing and swift support, Synopsys emerges as the more comprehensive option due to its robust features and extensive coverage.

Features: Acunetix stands out with an advanced scanning engine, detailed vulnerability reporting, and ease of use. Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] provides a full suite of security protocols, dynamic analysis, and continuous integration capabilities, offering more depth in analytical features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix features a straightforward deployment model and responsive customer service. Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] has a more complex deployment structure but is backed by comprehensive support and extensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix offers cost-effective solutions with lower initial costs and expedited deployment, resulting in attractive ROI for budget-conscious buyers. Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] requires a higher setup cost, justified by extensive features and long-term value, appealing to those seeking comprehensive security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti Web + API

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (7th)

Synopsys API Security Testi...

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

UmarQureshi

Security Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support

We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"Acunetix is the best service in the world."

"Overall, the tool is efficient enough to identify and track your vulnerabilities and it's good for intelligence scanning purposes."

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The solution is comprehensive and easy to use."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

More Invicti Web + API pros

"The technical support from Synopsys API Security Testing is amazing."

"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."

Cons

"One of the biggest problems I've had with Acunetix is that it's hard to replicate things manually because you don't get the raw packet."

"There are quite a few false positives that come out. It's mostly based upon finding XSS vulnerabilities, even though we know that XSS vulnerabilities do not exist within some of the web applications because of some frameworks we're using."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"Acunetix provides the benefit of saving time for an end user. I would not say it saves money because the cost and license of Acunetix is far more than what others offer."

More Invicti Web + API cons

"We haven't covered all the areas yet in our business. It's still being scaled up within the organization. We've probably covered 10 percent of the business. I don't think we've seen a proper ROI yet."

"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The price is exceptionally high."

More Invicti Web + API pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Invicti vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Web + API Competitors

Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

SonarQube vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Aikido Security vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Seeker Interactive vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API

October 2026

Download Invicti Web + API product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] report

Download Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.

Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.

What features make Acunetix stand out?

Rapid Scanning: Delivers fast and comprehensive security assessments.
User-Friendliness: Intuitive interface simplifies operations for diverse teams.
Detailed Reporting: Automated reports enhance vulnerability management.
High Accuracy: Detects vulnerabilities with minimal false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration supports continuous development processes.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating?

Vulnerability Detection: Critical for identifying potential security threats efficiently.
Flexibility: Supports both cloud and on-premises environments.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting standards like PCI DSS.
Scalability: Capable of handling large-scale web applications.

Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.

Invicti

AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.