OpenText Data Protector vs Teradata comparison

Read 76 Teradata reviews

10,676 Views
214 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Teradata and OpenText Data Protector compete in the data management and protection category. Teradata seems to have the upper hand in handling large data volumes with its efficient processing capabilities, while OpenText Data Protector excels in backup and recovery as well as integration with various systems.

Features: Teradata is recognized for its parallel processing, scalability, and adaptability, offering robust data analytics and partitioning features that enable fast query execution. OpenText Data Protector is appreciated for its reliable backup and recovery functionalities, seamless application integration, and ease of use in managing complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Teradata could improve in transactional processing, cloud services, cost efficiency, and user-friendliness. Users have also suggested improvements in documentation and support. OpenText Data Protector could enhance its user interface, documentation, and configuration ease for new users, while addressing complexities in integration and troubleshooting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Teradata is praised for varied deployment options like on-premises and cloud, and receives generally positive feedback on its technical support, although with occasional delays. OpenText Data Protector offers deployment flexibility with positive customer service feedback, yet some users wish for faster response times and enhanced technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Teradata is considered expensive, delivering significant ROI for larger projects needing robust data warehousing. In contrast, OpenText Data Protector offers a flexible, affordable pricing model, suitable for smaller-scale deployments, providing considerable data protection value.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Teradata Report (Updated: July 2025).

OpenText Data Protector vs. Teradata

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Data Integration (15th), Relational Databases Tools (8th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (9th), Marketing Management (6th), Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

RajeshKumar25

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Harnessing advanced parallelism for top performance while embracing cloud trends

Teradata is primarily used for data warehousing across all customers. My clients have built-in applications that use Teradata, and their use varies from customer to customer, depending on the industry and database size. The primary function is as an OLAP analytical ecosystem Scalability is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The normal file system backup is easy to manage, and our success rate is quite high."

"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."

"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"It's user-friendly and not overly complicated to configure."

"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."

"The most valuable feature of Data Protector is its integration with VMware. A lot of software these days integrates with VMware, and you can run some of these things on virtual machines. You can even have your backup manager running on a virtual machine and use physical managers to move data around. Their VMware integration isn't too bad, but Commvault has that feature, and many other backup products do."

"It is a traditional backup model. If you talk about file server and the official Windows database, it's a stable product."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

"It is a highly robust software solution."

"Parallel processing features have helped to easily dump any size of data and retrieve data with great performance."

"Teradata can be deployed on-premise, on the cloud, or in a virtual machine, which means customers can move without having to create their architecture all over again."

"The solution scales well on the cloud."

"I've never had any issues with scalability."

"The product is reliable."

"The cloud is ten times better than physical hardware; it is more cost-effective and the upgrade process is ten times easier."

"Auto-partitioning and indexing, and resource allocation on the fly are key features."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"In SAP restoration, we faced issues with changing the SIDs and changing the path for every backup object. It is quite a lengthy process to do that."

"The online backups of Office 365 have room for improvement. This is now available for the Exchange Online part of Office 365, but we're still waiting for SharePoint Online, Teams, etc. We know that it's coming, but it takes time."

"I do not think that this solution is relevant in the current IT market. They have not upgraded their features and functionalities which makes it difficult for them to remain competitive."

"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

"The only issue our company has with Teradata IntelliFlex is that it is not cost-effective because of the way the product has been designed."

"I would like more security and speed."

"Stability-wise, we have had some issues with automation and the ability to handle large datasets."

"Since I was working on the very basic, legacy systems, the memory thing was always a challenge. If Teradata is moving to the cloud, the space constraint or the memory issue that my company generally faces will eventually resolve, in time. What I'd like to see in the next release of Teradata is that it becomes full-fledged on the cloud, apart from better connectivity to various systems. For example, if I have to read or include a Python script, if I write some basic codes, I should be able to read even unstructured data. I know that it's not supported even in Snowflake, but at least semi-structured data support, if that can be a little more enhanced, that would be good."

"The scalability could be better. The on-premises solution is always more complicated to scale."

"It could be a bit more user-friendly."

"Apart from Control-M, it would be nice if it could integrate with other tools."

"Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

"The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space."

"Teradata is currently making improvements in this area."

"The cost of running Teradata is quite high, but you get a good return on investment."

"The price of Teradata could be less expensive."

"The price of Teradata is expensive. However, what they deliver they are outstanding. If you're looking for an inexpensive solution to run a database, this isn't your tool. It's the Ferrari of databases for data warehousing."

"The cost is substantial, totaling around $1.2 million, solely dedicated to upgrading the hardware."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The price of the solution could be reduced, it is expensive."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Comparisons

Compared 50% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 12% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

OpenText Data Protector

August 2025

Download Teradata product report

July 2025

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Teradata is a scalable data analytics platform designed to meet enterprise demands for large-scale data management and processing, focusing on performance, scalability, and security for complex query executions.

As a leading data warehousing solution, Teradata integrates advanced analytics enabling organizations to derive insights from massive datasets. It supports high-volume data workloads with its architecture optimized for analytical queries. Users benefit from its robust scalability, allowing seamless expansion as data grows. Teradata's SQL engine is compatible with a wide range of data types, ensuring flexibility in data analysis. With advanced security measures, it protects sensitive data across various environments, providing peace of mind to users handling critical information.

What are the most important features of Teradata?

Linear Scalability: Easily expands data processing capabilities to handle increasing data loads without performance degradation.
Advanced Analytics: Supports complex analytical operations integrating machine learning and AI for predictive insights.
SQL Compatibility: Offers a comprehensive SQL interface that supports complex queries across diverse data types.
Data Security: Implements rigorous security protocols to protect data integrity and confidentiality.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Decision-Making: Derive actionable insights quickly for strategic business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource usage reduces operational costs associated with data processing.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined data operations save time, allowing teams to focus on analysis.
Enhanced Scalability: Seamless growth without significant additional investment as data volumes increase.

Teradata is widely used in industries like finance, telecommunications, and healthcare, where data-driven decisions are critical. Companies leverage its robust analytics capabilities to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. In these sectors, quick access to data insights can significantly impact competitive advantage.

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Netflix