Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring comparison

OpenText and ATAKAMA Technologies are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.5, while ATAKAMA Technologies is ranked #85. OpenText holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to ATAKAMA Technologies’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ATAKAMA Technologies users who would recommend it.
OpenText Business Process M...
Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews
  • 347 Views
  • 340 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
POWERHOUSE Application Perf...
Read 4 POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring reviews
  • 194 Views
  • 182 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring compete in business process and application performance monitoring. POWERHOUSE has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set despite higher costs.

What features are offered by OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers real-time monitoring, detailed analytics, and the ability to identify process inefficiencies. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring includes robust performance tracking, customizable alerts, and extensive reporting capabilities. The versatility in POWERHOUSE's features gives it an edge.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring could enhance integration capabilities, provide more extensive training materials, and improve user interface design. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring could benefit from a more intuitive setup process, better scalability, and simplified user management. POWERHOUSE users experience fewer issues once the product is operational.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is easy to deploy but lacks extensive customer service support. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring has a more complex deployment but offers superior customer service with responsive support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring has lower setup costs but offers moderate ROI. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring comes with higher initial investments but provides a higher ROI due to its feature-rich platform. The advanced capabilities of POWERHOUSE justify the price difference.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
40th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
POWERHOUSE Application Perf...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
85th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization
Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.
Read full review
it_user328959 - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications, but it lacks automatic alerting.
Have real-time performance metrics Alerting Profiling in production Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications. Real added value in our IT internal and external organization (we open Nudge APM dashboard to our outsourced…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?
I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?
Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive requ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?
The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors
OmniPeek vs POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring Logo
OmniPeek vs POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
Compared 100% of the time
More POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
July 2025
OpenText Business Process Monitoring reportDownload OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
July 2025
POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring reportDownload POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Nudge APM
 

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText

The APM solution fully integrated with Real End User Monitoring and Synthetic Monitoring.

Be able to monitor and diagnose quickly any application performance slowdown with a fully integrated APM and User Monitoring solution. Start from the End User eyes and application response time monitoring down to code analysis and diagnostic. It has never been so easy to discover the root cause of any slow response time.

With few clics you can drill down and fix a problem to avoid any end user dissatisfaction or complain. APM is now integrated with End User Monitoring for a full understanding of what is happening. You can now monitor End User Satisfaction in production.

ATAKAMA Technologies
 

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Bank and Insurance : Crédit Agricole, CDC (Caisse des dépots et consignations), ACMS (French healthcare insurance), Service : Unibail Rodamco, Elis, Public : CNIL, Mairie de Paris, AESN, HAS, EPIDE, Ministere Education Nationale Software : Jalma, Neoxia, AFI, Traceone, Infinancials, Telecom operator : NordNet Media : Les Echos,
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
July 2025
Free Report: OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.