We performed a comparison between Odin Virtuozzo Containers and Proxmox VE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"The virtualization is good."
"The whole solution is good. It has good tools that help me in managing the servers. It is also stable."
"Proxmox VE is simple to use and it is feature rich. The fact is that it performs,"
"It fits in well with our organization. It works and does what it says it does."
"There are many features included with Proxmox."
"The solution is open source and free to use."
"We are happy with Proxmox VE. We use it as part of a cluster."
"In addition to the virtualization, the firewall and the routing functions that it provides are valuable."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"Backup and recovery could be better. It's a bit problematic. If you're not well-versed with Linux, it tends to be a bit of a challenge when setting up and recovering. It's not really GUI-based, and if you're not a good Linux user, it becomes a bit difficult. In the next release, I would like to have something like Hyper-V's Data Protection Manager, where you could do an offsite backup and keep a copy. I haven't seen that incorporated yet, but I'm sure they will do that."
"The only disadvantage of Proxmox VE is that it is a young solution so it does have some bugs."
"Proxmox VE can improve by importing OVF or OVA files directly from OVA. I need to convert all the images to raw images before importing them to Proxmox VE. If there is a solution that I can import directly from VMDK, it would be better."
"We are using servers individually, and we are looking for a reliable application that allows us to hop between servers with high availability."
"It is a good solution, but it is very complicated in some ways. It is not easy. You must have experience in the console mode to do some configurations. A lot of documentation and YouTube videos are available that you can use to learn about it."
"One issue with Proxmox is that some processes are not automatic. For some processes, you have to do it manually by command line."
"The documentation in Proxmox VE could improve."
"A feature which should be added is the ability to encrypt the main installation."
Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 11th in Server Virtualization Software with 1 review while Proxmox VE is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 19 reviews. Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0, while Proxmox VE is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proxmox VE writes "Feature rich, good compatibility, and impressive fuctionality". Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Hyper-V, KVM, VMware vSphere and Oracle VM, whereas Proxmox VE is most compared with Hyper-V, KVM, Oracle VM VirtualBox and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
