

TFS and NCM compete in the field of project management and cloud operations, respectively. Based on feature set comparisons, NCM seems to have the upper hand due to its strong integration capabilities and automation features for optimizing cloud operations.
Features: TFS integrates robustly with development environments, offering extensive ALM capabilities, version control, and comprehensive project management features. It is highly configurable and supports agile methodologies. NCM provides centralized management and automation for cloud operations, enhancing efficiency with one-click upgrades, capacity planning, and seamless orchestration of virtual environments.
Room for Improvement: TFS users criticize its Windows-only nature and complexity in integration with third-party tools, suggesting improvements in UI, agile functionalities, and workflow management. NCM could benefit from enhanced multi-language support and expanded vendor partnerships, despite its praised ease of use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS excels in on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments but lacks widespread user support, with mixed feedback on technical support. NCM offers versatility in deployment across on-premises, private, and public cloud environments, with generally strong customer service and a flexible support approach, albeit sometimes limited locally.
Pricing and ROI: TFS's pricing is complex and perceived as high, notably without Microsoft integration. However, its ROI is favorable for organizations using Microsoft products due to its scalability and integration capabilities. NCM's pricing, while initially high, results in quick ROI through operational efficiencies and consolidated management, offering cost-effective management and savings.
Anything that reduces bandwidth and reduces the brain work that our teams have to do to maintain systems across all environments is time-saving and cost-saving.
The biggest return on investment for me when using this product is the fast deployment and the rapid integration and migration without impacting our operations during the migration.
Playbooks and automation definitely freed up engineer time. This allows us to focus on other projects and not have to get hands-on, reducing operational costs.
Integrating TFS with Visual Studio and Azure Cloud has improved our development processes by providing better integration and reducing errors.
There is a feature that allows you to escalate the call.
The handoff with support and the knowledge of the support engineer is significantly better than experience with other vendors.
Even when a node goes down, it doesn't impact our infrastructure because it gets load-balanced between the available nodes.
as a Microsoft product, it might have limited global documentation or support options compared to GitLab.
Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) scales well.
The key aspects include mix-match hardware and hyper-converged infrastructure, combining compute, storage, and network in a single platform.
Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) has not had any issues scaling with the growing needs of my company.
We've never had any downtime related to the Nutanix product itself.
I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.
The stability and reliability of Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) have been excellent.
Its stability is lacking as we have encountered security leaks and glitches.
It supports different hardware types without vendor lock-in, which is an advantage over Azure Stack HCI, which may only work with specific vendors such as HP or Dell.
Our primary reason for choosing Nutanix was for mission-critical applications and Kubernetes.
Quick resolution of disconnection issues and errors in plugins is crucial.
TFS is not as fast, easy to use, or configurable as GitLab, despite moving into the cloud.
I am content with how TFS is structured now, particularly the Azure version.
It's not cheap, but there are savings and return on investment when coming from a non-Nutanix shop.
In comparison, Nutanix's pricing is significantly higher than that of other setups.
While VMware costs depend on ESXi hypervisor pricing, the AHV hypervisor for Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) is free.
It's easy to control resources and govern the resources, and it frees up support to focus on other things without having to help developers.
I would approximate the cost savings to be in the 20% to 25% range since we can optimize our resources and avoid the need to purchase more hardware or reuse resources in the infrastructure from one implementation.
The importance of faster outcomes for their environment is significant; for example, when I delivered the Disaster Recovery solution, we included automation for auto-configuration of VMs and resizing of VMs, which replaced many tasks that were previously done manually.
The integration with Azure DevOps also offers seamless functionality for CI/CD processes.
Makes it easier for me to create builds and release pipelines without needing to program YAML files.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) | 0.7% |
| TFS | 3.7% |
| Other | 95.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 65 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
Nutanix Cloud Manager streamlines hybrid cloud management by offering centralized control, automation, and workload optimization across platforms. It improves operational efficiency while reducing IT management complexity.
Nutanix Cloud Manager is designed for comprehensive hybrid cloud governance, providing tools for virtualization, resource allocation, and compliance. Its features include one-click upgrades, dynamic dashboards, and the seamless automation of tasks through X-Play. Users can efficiently manage virtual machines, ensure secure storage, and enhance productivity with predictive monitoring. Self-service capabilities allow users to reserve resources easily, while central management via Prism Pro and automated reports enhance oversight and decision-making. Challenges include UI simplicity, pricing transparency, and licensing efficiency, with users seeking improvements in VM organization, blueprint customization, and collaborative support for hybrid environments.
What important features define Nutanix Cloud Manager?Nutanix Cloud Manager finds utility in industries requiring robust hybrid cloud strategies like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It excels in centralizing management for secure and compliant operations, optimizing workloads, and providing scalable solutions for resource allocation and compliance monitoring, thus enhancing cloud operations in diverse markets.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.