We performed a comparison between Nuage Networks and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Red Hat, SolarWinds and others in Network Automation."One of the most valuable features of this solution is network management. The customer is able to manage their network from home or we can also manage the whole customer network."
"It has good reporting and analytics, that most people can understand without too much difficulty."
"It is stable and reliable."
"RBAC is great around Organizations and I can use that backend as our lab. Ingesting stuff into the JSON logs, into any sort of logging collector; it works with Splunk and there are other collectors as well. It supports Sumo and that helps, I can go create reports in Sumo Logic. Workflows are an interesting feature. I can collect a lot of templates and create a workflow out of them."
"I like the inventory management. It's a very nice, simple, concise way to keep all that data together. And the API allows us to use it even for things that are not Ansible."
"There are new modules available, which help to simplify the workflow. That is what we like about it."
"It is quick to production. It has an API in the back which allows for integrations."
"Ansible Tower offers use a UI where we can see all the pushes that have gone into the server."
"The most valuable feature is that Ansible is agentless."
"The most useful features are the playbooks. We can develop our playbooks and simplify them doing something like a cross platform."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Security is an area that could use some work."
"The setup can be complex."
"The product could do a better job at building infrastructure."
"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is not the best at server provisioning. Terraform is better."
"It needs better documentation."
"Documentation could be improved. Many times, if I'm looking for something, I have to Google it in a lot of places, then figure out what the best approach will be. There are some best practices documents, but they don't give you the information."
"Accessibility. Ansible uses a CLI by default. Those accustomed to it can find their way and adopt the YAML files easily over time. But, some users are more comfortable using UIs..."
"The governance features could be improved."
"Some of the modules in Ansible could be a bit more mature. There is still a little room for further development. Some performance aspects could be improved, perhaps in the form of parallelism within Ansible."
"The tool should allow us to create infrastructure. It has everything when it comes to management, but it lacks the provisioning aspect."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Nuage Networks is ranked 11th in Network Automation with 4 reviews while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is ranked 2nd in Network Automation with 58 reviews. Nuage Networks is rated 8.8, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Nuage Networks writes "Great multi-tenancy and routing functionalities but needs more security capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform writes "Capable of broad integrations with easy-to-operate infrastructure and user controls". Nuage Networks is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Cisco ACI, VMware NSX, Fortinet FortiGate and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is most compared with Red Hat Satellite, Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Aria Automation, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Microsoft Intune.
See our list of best Network Automation vendors.
We monitor all Network Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.