"After we finished setting Contrail up, it seemed stable enough. Still, we never tested it in a real environment, so we don't have enough information to say whether it's stable with a given number of users and appliances. We have tested it in a lab environment, but we haven't tested enough to say that the platform is stable."
"It has good reporting and analytics, that most people can understand without too much difficulty."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is network management. The customer is able to manage their network from home or we can also manage the whole customer network."
"Visibility, especially for the top of the platform, is a nightmare. The top was documented incorrectly and really complex to complete. In the end, it worked but only after several weeks of work with the support of a Juniper solution engineer in Holland."
"Security is an area that could use some work."
Juniper Contrail Networking is ranked 4th in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 1 review while Nuage Networks is ranked 2nd in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 2 reviews. Juniper Contrail Networking is rated 6.0, while Nuage Networks is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Juniper Contrail Networking writes "It's stable enough in a lab, but the setup is complex, and support is insufficient". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nuage Networks writes "Easy to use features, good support, and has the ability to maintain a session when you lose an uplink". Juniper Contrail Networking is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware NSX, Tungsten Fabric, VMware SD-WAN and Versa FlexVNF, whereas Nuage Networks is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware NSX, Cisco ACI, Meraki SD-WAN and Juniper Contrail SD-WAN.
See our list of best Software Defined Networking (SDN) vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.