Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NICE CXone vs OpenText Qfiniti comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 17, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NICE CXone
Ranking in Workforce Engagement Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
IVR Systems (2nd), Live Chat (1st), Knowledge Management Software (6th), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (6th)
OpenText Qfiniti
Ranking in Workforce Engagement Management
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Workforce Engagement Management category, the mindshare of NICE CXone is 16.0%, up from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Qfiniti is 0.5%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workforce Engagement Management
 

Featured Reviews

James Arvidson - PeerSpot reviewer
A software that enables centers to operate more efficiently, increase the quality of every customer interaction, create new pathways to profit, and ensure ongoing customer-centric business improvemen
One of the best aspects of CXone is its omnichannel experience. It treats all contacts, whether phone, chat, email, or SMS, through the same system, allowing for consistent reporting and a true omnichannel experience. The platform is very flexible. You can customize it to do almost anything as long as it's based on logic, which has been incredibly valuable. In terms of analytics, CXone offers consistent, accessible data across all channels. In the past, different systems like Avaya for phones or separate platforms for chat and email made it hard to compare performance across channels. With CXone, you get the same data points across all interactions, making decision-making much easier. It also allows for deeper reporting, like IVR reporting, where you can see what options people choose and create custom KPIs for better insight.
Use OpenText Qfiniti?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workforce Engagement Management solutions are best for your needs.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with NICE CXone?
The audio quality in NICE CXone has room for improvement, as I experience issues like diffused calls and crackling audio. Clearing cache and cookies from browsers often resolves these problems, but...
What is your primary use case for NICE CXone?
I use NICE CXone ( /products/nice-cxone-reviews ) for several purposes, such as addressing issues where calls are dropping or getting diffused. I also encounter situations where prompts are not pla...
What advice do you have for others considering NICE CXone?
Overall, I rate NICE CXone as an eight out of ten. I would recommend this tool to others in similar roles. There are areas for improvement, like the simplification of certain tools and the enhancem...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

NICE inContact, NICE CXone Workforce Optimization Pro, NICE CXOne WFO Pro, CXone Workforce Optimization, inContact Workforce Optimization, CallCopy, Discover, VPI Empower, Brand Embassy, goMoxie
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MoneyGram, Honeywell, Radisson Hotel Group, AAA, New Balance, MattressFIRM, Teleflora, Best Buy
Asurion, HSN, Transcom, SAP
Find out what your peers are saying about Genesys, Five9, NICE and others in Workforce Engagement Management. Updated: April 2025.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.