We performed a comparison between NGINX App Protect and SiteLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).NGINX App Protect is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 19 reviews while SiteLock is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2, while SiteLock is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteLock writes "Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. ". NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas SiteLock is most compared with Cloudflare, Sucuri, AWS WAF, Imperva DDoS and Comodo cWatch.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.