SiteLock and NGINX App Protect compete in the website and application protection category. While SiteLock is favored for affordability and customer support, NGINX App Protect is seen as superior for its advanced security features.
Features:SiteLock includes automated malware removal, daily scans, and comprehensive vulnerability patching. NGINX App Protect is known for detailed traffic monitoring, robust DDoS protection capabilities, and its customizable security solutions, catering to larger enterprises.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:SiteLock is recognized for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. NGINX App Protect, although requiring a more complex setup and specialized expertise, offers extensive documentation and reliable support.
Pricing and ROI:SiteLock is considered cost-effective with lower setup costs and affordable plans, appealing to small to medium businesses. NGINX App Protect requires a higher upfront investment, but provides significant ROI for organizations needing extensive application layer protection.
NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:
NGINX App Protect offers:
Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.