We performed a comparison between NGINX App Protect and Noname Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security."The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found."
"NGINX App Protect's best features are auto-learning, which creates a profile of applications that are deployed, bot protection, and force protection, which lets you configure your brute force policy and alert for and prevent brute force attacks."
"It is a very good tool for load balancing."
"It's very easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its flexibility."
"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its open source."
"The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall."
"The initial setup was simple and took three to four days."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its integration with API gateways, WAP and with part of their SDLC."
"NGINX App Protect would be improved with integration with Shape and F5 WAF, which would make it easy for users to manage all their web application security with a single solution."
"It's challenging if you need to go for a high throughput."
"The product's user interface is an area with shortcomings as it can be quite confusing for users, making it an area where improvements are required."
"As far as scalability, it takes a long time for deployment."
"The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary."
"The setup of NGINX App Protect is complex. The full process took one week to complete. Additionally, we had to change the network infrastructure platform which took one month."
"The dashboard could provide a more comprehensive view of the status of the connections."
"They could provide a better user interface."
"I think it would be good if they can integrate more with API gateways as this is currently limited."
NGINX App Protect is ranked 3rd in API Security with 19 reviews while Noname Security is ranked 1st in API Security with 1 review. NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2, while Noname Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Noname Security writes "Security platform that offers value through its integration with API gateways". NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Noname Security is most compared with Salt Security, Traceable AI, Akamai API Security, Cequence Security and Wallarm NG WAF.
See our list of best API Security vendors.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.