Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetScaler vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

NetScaler and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. NetScaler is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. NetScaler holds a 1.7% mindshare in NMA, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of NetScaler users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
NetScaler
Read 107 NetScaler reviews
  • 7,489 Views
  • 150 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Operations...
Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews
  • 394 Views
  • 75 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

NetScaler and OpenText Network Operations Management are competing in the network operations space. Data shows OpenText Network Operations Management as the superior solution due to its robust features, which many feel justify its cost, while NetScaler leads in customer satisfaction regarding pricing and support.

Features: NetScaler provides strong load balancing, high availability, and application performance acceleration. OpenText Network Operations Management offers comprehensive IT operations management capabilities, scalability, and detailed analytics. The primary difference lies in OpenText's extensive feature set tailored for large enterprise environments compared to NetScaler’s focus on networking efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetScaler is known for straightforward deployment and responsive technical support. OpenText Network Operations Management, while offering a rich set of functionalities, has a steeper learning curve during deployment but compensates with dedicated customer service valued by users.

Pricing and ROI: NetScaler offers a competitive initial setup cost, delivering a faster ROI due to its streamlined processes. OpenText Network Operations Management involves a higher upfront investment but potentially offers a greater ROI in the long run owing to its comprehensive management capabilities. NetScaler stands out with cost-effective deployment, whereas OpenText provides greater overall value despite larger initial expenses.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NetScaler vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NetScaler vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NetScaler
Ranking in Network Management Applications
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (1st), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)
OpenText Network Operations...
Ranking in Network Management Applications
20th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (64th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of NetScaler is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Management Applications
 

Featured Reviews

DEMİRHAN ÇAVUŞOĞLU - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool for centralized management including inventory and sales tracking
Citrix ADM has the ability to implement policies to tighten security. For instance, you can restrict access to your network from outsiders or lack necessary security measures such as antivirus programs. Additionally, there's the Delivery Controller, which allows for comprehensive monitoring and management tasks such as remote restarts, maintenance, and registration. Another essential component is the Director, which provides detailed insights into sessions, including identifying session failures, connection issues, user lockouts, etc. It presents a list of problems to address, enabling you to click on them and resolve them efficiently.
Read full review
AhmedBahgat - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable
The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution. It crashed only once, four years ago...There is a return on investment using the solution."
"The analytics are a great feature."
"The most valuable features are for the ADMs and the overall monitoring environment."
"Easy, user-friendly setup with content switching and integrated caching features."
"The solution can scale."
"The advantage of Citrix Web App and API Protection is just its graphic user interface for beginners. The solution is nothing special, but we have to use it for the corporation. Another advantage of Citrix Web App and API Protection is that we have our copy to test things and get the know-how of it."
"The work balancing applications are the most valuable feature."
"SSL Offload"
More NetScaler pros
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
 

Cons

"The GUI should be improved."
"The main areas for improvement would be around documentation and support. If a feature can be used in two or three ways, show that feature being used in all of those ways. Documentation seems to only cover the primary use case and leaves you to either run through trial and error or consult the user community. In terms of support, I have never actually had them solve any of my issues. I have always solved them myself and then provided the resolution to support."
"They can improve the scalability and the multi-tenancy feature. We recently tried to configure an authentication, and we ran into some issues while using the web-based GUI. It was very slow when you log in with your credentials in the web-based GUI. Each time we clicked on the menu, it tried to do the authentication. It works properly in the console."
"I think there is always room for improvement in this type of solutions. For example, I think the GUI should be easy to understand."
"Citrix is more expensive than Horizon."
"Citrix should improve the documentation. It is not really clear how to set up many features to our advantage. When we setup Citrix NetScaler ADC, we have to figure it out by ourselves without a lot of documentation."
"The SLB could be better, and they should improve it."
"I feel that Citrix NetScaler's customer support needs to improve."
More NetScaler cons
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Citrix ADM costs us approximately $5000 per month."
"The licenses for this product are payable as a yearly subscription, and carry a high price-point. The subscription scheme is quite complicated, and costs will increase with each additional feature that is required, outside of the basic setup."
"The firewall license is included by default, with no additional costs."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten since it is expensive."
"Costly product and complicated licensing."
"The license for Citrix NetScaler is on an annual basis and it is reasonably priced."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight or nine out of ten."
"You can do CapEx and then a yearly monthly fee, or you can do a subscription model, whether that's one month, month-to-month, or three-year subscription model."
More NetScaler pricing and cost advice
"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix ADC?
The most valuable feature for us is the application firewalling in Citrix NetScaler, ensuring only valid traffic enters our environment.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix ADC?
After deployment, Citrix Netscaler shifted to a subscription-based license scheme for support, which is slightly more expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Citrix ADC?
Citrix NetScaler is a robust product, but mastering it requires significant learning and training due to its complexity. While it could be easier to manage, it is like transitioning from driving a ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The price is reasonable based on the agreement.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

HAProxy vs NetScaler Logo
HAProxy vs NetScaler
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NetScaler Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NetScaler
Compared 9% of the time
Fortinet FortiADC vs NetScaler Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs NetScaler
Compared 9% of the time
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NetScaler Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NetScaler
Compared 8% of the time
NGINX Plus vs NetScaler Logo
NGINX Plus vs NetScaler
Compared 7% of the time
More NetScaler Competitors
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
NetScaler
August 2025
NetScaler reportDownload NetScaler product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
July 2025
OpenText Network Operations Management reportDownload OpenText Network Operations Management product report
 

Also Known As

Citrix ADC, Citrix NetScaler VPX, NetScaler Console, NetScaler Web Application Firewall
Micro Focus Network Operations Management
 

Overview

One platform for a consistent application delivery and security experience because nobody has time to learn multiple systems to manage ADC deployments. NetScaler is built with a single code base using a software-based architecture, so no matter which ADC form factor you choose — hardware, virtual machine, bare metal, or container — the behavior will be the same.

NetScaler

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

ABB Schweiz, Aer Lingus, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Amnet Technology Solutions, Aramex International, Ascenty, Atos, Autodesk
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
NetScaler vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
July 2025
Free Report: NetScaler vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
Find out what your peers are saying about NetScaler vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NetScaler vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.