NetApp StorageGRID vs Scality RING comparison

NetApp and Scality are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. NetApp is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Scality is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. NetApp holds a 5.8% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Scality’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Scality users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Scality RING and NetApp StorageGRID are competing products in the object storage landscape. Scality RING seems to have the upper hand in pricing with appealing cost benefits, whereas NetApp StorageGRID stands out for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Scality RING offers scalability, multi-cloud support, and advanced security options, ideal for enterprises focusing on data durability. NetApp StorageGRID provides comprehensive data management, automated lifecycle policies, and efficient storage tiering, focusing on data compliance and governance.

Room for Improvement: Scality RING could enhance its user interface to improve usability. Adding more integration options for diverse enterprise applications would be beneficial. Customer support availability could also be expanded. NetApp StorageGRID would benefit from reduced complexity in its data management features. Simplifying deployment processes could enhance user experience. Expanding cost-saving measures in pricing models would be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Scality RING supports on-premises and hybrid-cloud infrastructures, offering flexibility and intuitive scalability. NetApp StorageGRID streamlines deployment through robust data lifecycle management and automation but could enhance its service experience with additional resources and support options.

Pricing and ROI: Scality RING is cost-effective with straightforward pricing, achieving ROI quickly through its simplified scalability. NetApp StorageGRID, despite higher initial costs, offers powerful data management and compliance features, leading to long-term operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp StorageGRID vs. Scality RING Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp StorageGRID vs. Scality RING

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,029 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.6

Pure Storage FlashBlade reduces total cost of ownership by enhancing efficiency, enabling fast restorations, and supporting diverse use cases.

Sentiment score

1.0

NetApp StorageGRID lowers costs by eliminating tape libraries and improving efficiency, offering scalability and revenue-generating opportunities for customers.

Sentiment score

7.3

Scality RING provides cost-effective storage reducing operating costs, but security and redundancy may increase expenses for some users.

It does not require much management once you set up correctly, so it saves time, allowing an admin to focus on other work.

Parul-Patel

Senior Network Engineer at Holy Redeemer Health System, Inc.

For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report

I think RING's ability to maintain predictable costs while providing scalable storage solutions impacts our budget by allowing us to pay only for capacity.

Sebastien Foucou

Infrastructure architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

For instance, while the cost per gig on a block storage platform may be $2, it's $1.50 for NAS, and only $0.50 for object storage, leading to a remarkable 75% reduction in costs by utilizing the Scality platform.

reviewer2713596

Storage Engineering Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Scality RING has reduced our operating costs.

Thierry Diot

Engineer at MinArm

For more quotes and insights, download the Scality RING report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.6

Pure Storage FlashBlade's support is generally praised for responsiveness, despite occasional delays and communication issues, maintaining a favorable reputation.

Sentiment score

7.2

NetApp StorageGRID support is efficient but has mixed reviews due to expertise gaps and reliance on self-support in small markets.

Sentiment score

6.8

Scality RING's customer service is praised for expert, responsive support, with personalized help making most users highly satisfied.

I would rate them an eight out of ten.

Redy ERIYAWAN

IT Field Support Engineer at Unisys

The support is done through email and is not that great, making it a very problematic area I've been dealing with for over four years.

Parul-Patel

Senior Network Engineer at Holy Redeemer Health System, Inc.

Their technical support has been perfect lately, so I would give it a 10.

MikaelHellström

IT Manager at Regin Dalarna

For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report

When evaluating the technical support of NetApp StorageGRID, I would give it an eight out of ten.

Andres Parts

Sales Director at Proact Estonia AS

I would rate the support for NetApp StorageGRID as eight out of 10.

Michael Lopez

Sr Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

That's due to the fact that we haven't implemented all the technical support facilities in NetApp.

Joost Van Der Eijk

Operations manager at ODC-Noord

For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report

I've always received responses within the required timeframe, the answers were technically relevant, and there was follow-up—people called us back to check if everything was okay and if the ticket could be closed.

Sebastien Foucou

Infrastructure architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Individuals such as Peter Mikolastik really make a difference by saying, 'Come on, what is the problem? I will help you,' rather than just brushing things off.

reviewer2716008

data center manager at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Technically, when we have major issues in P1, they are very responsive and we can't say that we don't get a response.

reviewer2702499

Operational Infrastructure Pilot at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Scality RING report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.6

Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in scalability, with seamless expansion, downtime-free growth, and praised support across various sectors.

Sentiment score

7.3

NetApp StorageGRID is commended for seamless, non-disruptive scalability and effective handling of large data volumes in enterprise environments.

Sentiment score

7.1

Scality RING offers high scalability and adaptability, though experiences vary with rebalancing challenges and some seeking improvement.

Pure Storage FlashBlade is scalable.

Parul-Patel

Senior Network Engineer at Holy Redeemer Health System, Inc.

There are between 5 and 10,000 people using it in our organization.

MikaelHellström

IT Manager at Regin Dalarna

For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report

The scalability of NetApp StorageGRID has been proven as we've expanded twice.

Michael Lopez

Sr Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

The scalability of NetApp StorageGRID rates an eight or nine out of ten.

Andres Parts

Sales Director at Proact Estonia AS

For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report

Upwards, I think, almost unlimited by what we can imagine.

reviewer2711367

System Engineer - Head of Engineering at a retailer with 11-50 employees

I've never had issues with scalability.

Sebastien Foucou

Infrastructure architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

We are relatively well informed about their new features, what will be implemented in future versions, and the scalability of the solution.

reviewer2702499

Operational Infrastructure Pilot at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Scality RING report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.1

Pure Storage FlashBlade offers exceptional reliability and impressive stability, featuring 99.999% uptime, seamless upgrades, and high performance.

Sentiment score

8.3

NetApp StorageGRID is valued for its reliable performance, redundancy, and effective support, with stability ratings of eight to nine.

Sentiment score

7.4

Scality RING offers dependable performance with high uptime, seamless maintenance, quick recovery, and strong resilience against failures.

In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another.

Redy ERIYAWAN

IT Field Support Engineer at Unisys

For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report

My impression of the stability of NetApp StorageGRID is quite high; from one to ten, I would rate it a nine.

Andres Parts

Sales Director at Proact Estonia AS

We experienced very little stability issues.

Michael Lopez

Sr Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report

It is a platform that is very stable at the customer level and does not generate incidents or blockages that you might encounter with standard storage solutions, where you can lose data.

reviewer2702499

Operational Infrastructure Pilot at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

I find that Scality RING is very stable because it allows for many maintenance operations without service loss.

Sebastien Foucou

Infrastructure architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

There are factors that can cause Scality RING to become occasionally unavailable, but due to the system's resilience, it is capable of recovering or degrading gracefully.

reviewer2707281

Senior ICT Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Scality RING report

Room For Improvement

Users recommend better pricing, cloud integration, support, documentation, and analytics for Pure Storage FlashBlade, improving efficiency and compatibility.

NetApp StorageGRID's interface is complex, integration and pricing need improvement, and marketing and automated management require enhancement.

Scality RING requires improvements in rebalancing, feature expansion, UI, administration, S3 compatibility, and performance during scaling and upgrades.

Technical support definitely needs significant improvement.

Parul-Patel

Senior Network Engineer at Holy Redeemer Health System, Inc.

Its configuration should be easier.

Redy ERIYAWAN

IT Field Support Engineer at Unisys

One way Pure Storage FlashBlade can be improved is by having more compatibility between the FlashArray and FlashBlade.

MikaelHellström

IT Manager at Regin Dalarna

For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report

They need to focus on a better upgrade path with easier and more resilient upgrades.

Michael Lopez

Sr Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

It would be great if it could fix internal issues itself without manual intervention.

Gabriele P

Storage IT Specialist at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees

In terms of functionality, reliability, and scalability, we are satisfied with NetApp.

Joost Van Der Eijk

Operations manager at ODC-Noord

For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report

Encryption and data security need improvement. We don't have a solution for customers who need confidentiality.

reviewer2702499

Operational Infrastructure Pilot at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

They should prioritize quality over timeliness to minimize customer disruptions and not force customers into a cycle of fixes that interfere with daily work.

reviewer2713596

Storage Engineering Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

What we are currently missing and will be demanding in the new tender is an additional external backup of all data, ideally on a simple system, to safeguard against any severe local incidents so that we still have the data protected elsewhere.

reviewer2716008

data center manager at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Scality RING report

Setup Cost

Pure Storage FlashBlade is costly but valued for performance, reliability, and reduced administrative overhead, justifying its premium price.

NetApp StorageGRID is expensive yet cost-effective for large-scale storage, with flexible initial investment and negotiable annual licensing.

Scality RING targets enterprises with 10 PB needs, high setup costs, expandable licenses, and "Pay As You Grow" model appeal.

The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the past, but one benefit is that they have built-in ransomware protection.

Parul-Patel

Senior Network Engineer at Holy Redeemer Health System, Inc.

Regarding pricing, it is okay; we needed exactly this in size, and the price was a lot lower than competitors, making it good for us.

MikaelHellström

IT Manager at Regin Dalarna

For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report

I'd rate the pricing eight out of ten.

Andres Parts

Sales Director at Proact Estonia AS

It would definitely be more on the expensive side, especially if you compare it with open source solutions like Ceph.

Joost Van Der Eijk

Operations manager at ODC-Noord

From what I understood, it was cheaper than EMC ECS, though this was over seven years ago.

Michael Lopez

Sr Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report

Fortunately, in terms of the license, we are able to expand the disks without having to adjust the license.

reviewer2711367

System Engineer - Head of Engineering at a retailer with 11-50 employees

In the end, it always depends on how much you pay for it.

reviewer2707281

Senior ICT Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Regarding setup costs and licensing, our initial experience is somewhat dated now as we made a comprehensive purchase, including hardware, software, and system setup, which Scality handled at the time.

reviewer2716008

data center manager at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Scality RING report

Valuable Features

Pure Storage FlashBlade excels with ease of use, fast performance, scalability, seamless integration, and efficient storage features.

NetApp StorageGRID offers S3 access, rapid backup, deduplication, scalability, management ease, and integration, enhancing usability and data retrieval.

Scality RING excels in scalability, S3 integration, performance, and cost-effectiveness, offering robust security, data protection, and easy administration.

We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte.

Redy ERIYAWAN

IT Field Support Engineer at Unisys

The best features of Pure Storage FlashBlade include better throughput and better performance.

Parul-Patel

Senior Network Engineer at Holy Redeemer Health System, Inc.

Pure Storage FlashBlade's scalability is one of the most valuable features, and importantly, it always works, allowing for seamless upgrades.

MikaelHellström

IT Manager at Regin Dalarna

For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report

The feature of NetApp StorageGRID that has significantly improved data storage management for my customers is the value of the S3 API because it allows developers who are not infrastructure-oriented to use it and write code against it.

Andres Parts

Sales Director at Proact Estonia AS

NetApp StorageGRID is a great alternative to AWS S3 buckets.

Gabriele P

Storage IT Specialist at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees

The scalability is very effective for our customers.

Joost Van Der Eijk

Operations manager at ODC-Noord

For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report

When a server is lost, the data is still accessible.

reviewer2702499

Operational Infrastructure Pilot at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

It is even better stored when there is only one copy on a system and there is a second copy on an immutability system, which is almost equivalent to backing it up on tape and taking it offline, making it completely inaccessible.

reviewer2711367

System Engineer - Head of Engineering at a retailer with 11-50 employees

Scality RING has influenced our approach to scaling in different dimensions by providing a cost-effective solution for the tremendous amount of data we generate every day for each customer.

reviewer2713596

Storage Engineering Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Scality RING report

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 5.7%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp StorageGRID is 5.8%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Scality RING is 4.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Scality RING	4.2%
Pure Storage FlashBlade	5.7%
NetApp StorageGRID	5.8%
Other	84.3%

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

MikaelHellström

IT Manager at Regin Dalarna

Has handled backup storage needs reliably and supports seamless upgrades

In environments requiring high throughput and low latency, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high throughput and normal latency, but we do not have any application that requires low latency right now, so the latency of three to five milliseconds is considered kind of high. Pure Storage FlashBlade's ability to integrate with enterprise applications is not important for us, as we only want to present an S3 bucket for our backup, which we have done, and it works very fast. We use the Purity software's data reduction techniques; we have a backup software that compresses everything before sending it to the S3 bucket, achieving a data reduction of 1.1 to one. I would recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade to other companies because it's a very fast and scalable solution for anyone who needs it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.

Read full review

Michael Lopez

Sr Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced storage costs and improved snapshot management for large data workloads

The advanced features of NetApp StorageGRID which our upper management wouldn't agree to use, include the S3 feature. We are heavy into AWS, and my thoughts were to develop a small dev environment or even a POC environment on-prem. That's still up in the air as we continue on. Currently, AI has taken over everything with a focus on AI. The upgrades of NetApp StorageGRID present a challenge. It's a rolling upgrade, node by node. At one point, one node would not upgrade. The positive aspect is that it didn't take down the entire environment. The environment remained functional on two different versions. The scalability of NetApp StorageGRID has been proven as we've expanded twice. We started with six or seven nodes and have grown to 15 nodes. It does take time for synchronization to complete. From what I've seen, it took a couple of months for it all to sync up once adding nodes. However, it was transparent. It captured the addition and performed effectively, all happening in the background, steadily and surely.

Read full review

Sebastien Foucou

Infrastructure architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Leverages seamless data access with efficient storage management

I would improve Scality RING by bundling the Operating System with RING and modernizing the graphical interfaces. As for areas for improvement—if I had to summarize—a technical aspect would be the Operating System part, which today isn't really covered by Scality RING, whereas it is with Artesca. It would be a real advantage for customers to have a bundle that includes both the Operating System and Scality RING, with an install and maintenance model handled by Scality. Secondly, perhaps a more cosmetic point—the graphical interfaces could be modernized a bit. There's been work done on Artesca; maybe it should be extended more to RING. I believe that should come with version 10, so I'm not too concerned. I find RING's cyber resilience against ransomware threats somewhat complicated to assess. The product itself offers sufficient protection, and the features provided via S3 allow you to protect against this kind of attack—provided you implement these features, such as object lock with retention and everything that goes with it. If I had to identify an area for improvement, it would be the OS part—but that doesn't necessarily concern RING, unlike Artesca, which comes bundled with an OS. There's been real work done by the Scality teams to secure the system layer in Artesca. It didn't influence us. We know the product and what needs to be implemented to protect data, and it's part of the best practices we also pass on to our clients.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the pas...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?

I believe there is not much improvement needed because they have everything we need, but the interface is a little bi...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp StorageGRID?

The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to rest...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp StorageGRID?

As an administrator, I was not involved in the pricing of NetApp StorageGRID. From what I understood, it was cheaper ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp StorageGRID?

The upgrades of NetApp StorageGRID present challenges. It's a rolling upgrade, node by node. At one point, one node w...

See all answers

What do you like most about Scality RING8?

Another feature I like is the life cycle management that helps me with data storage efficiency.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Scality RING8?

There are areas that may have room for improvement, and the Scality team is aware of it. You can obtain information d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Scality RING8?

Scality RING serves multiple use cases for storage, for GenAI and analytics, unstructured and structured data, backup...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 19% of the time

MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 10% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 2% of the time

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors

MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 28% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 22% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 21% of the time

Hitachi Content Platform vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp StorageGRID Competitors

MinIO vs Scality RING

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudian HyperStore vs Scality RING

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Scality RING

Compared 13% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs Scality RING

Compared 12% of the time

Scality ARTESCA vs Scality RING

Compared 3% of the time

More Scality RING Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pure Storage FlashBlade

October 2025

Download Pure Storage FlashBlade product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp StorageGRID

October 2025

Download NetApp StorageGRID product report

Buyer's Guide

Scality RING

October 2025

Download Scality RING product report

Also Known As

No data available

Storage GRID

Scality RING, RING8

Overview

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Pure Storage

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media.

NetApp

Scality RING is the scalable and resilient object storage solution designed for modern workloads, providing seamless data protection against evolving cyber threats.

Scality RING leverages S3 object storage to meet unpredictable demands with a patented MultiScale Architecture that offers limitless scalability across capacity, performance, and more. It delivers end-to-end cyber resilience with CORE5 for ransomware protection, while its cloud-style economics and intuitive management empower enterprises to accelerate AI initiatives and optimize cloud deployments. Its flexibility is ideal for service providers managing extensive data needs.

What are the key features of Scality RING?

S3 and CDMI Support: Ensures compatibility for application needs.
Erasure Coding: Provides cost-efficient, durable storage.
Unified Tiered Infrastructure: Aids billing per IOPS.
Lifecycle Management: Optimizes storage utilization.
Unlimited Scalability: Ideal for large enterprise demands.
Data/Metadata Ring Deployment: Ensures robust performance and tailored SLAs.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Economic Value: Offers cost-effective storage solutions.
Effective Support: Enhances collaboration through responsive assistance.
Improved Flexibility: Adaptable deployment models for complex needs.

Scality RING is extensively implemented in backup solutions across industries, supporting platforms like Veeam and CommVault. It aids in storage expansion and management of large data volumes alongside multi-site architectures. While not leading in AI spaces due to performance constraints, there's potential with faster disk support. It's also used in archives, binary lakes, multimedia services, and AI data lakes.

Scality

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL

ASE, DARZ GmbH

Comcast, TimeWarner Cable, EuroSport, Orange, Deluxe, DailtMotion, SFR, RTL, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Telstra

Buyer's Guide

NetApp StorageGRID vs. Scality RING

September 2025

Free Report: NetApp StorageGRID vs. Scality RING

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp StorageGRID vs. Scality RING and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp StorageGRID vs. Scality RING report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.