NetApp E-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe comparison

NetApp and Pure Storage are both solutions in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category. NetApp is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while Pure Storage is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. NetApp holds a 2.2% mindshare in N, compared to Pure Storage’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pure Storage users who would recommend it.

NetApp E-Series

Read 4 NetApp E-Series reviews

443 Views
439 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Read 36 Pure FlashArray X NVMe reviews

1,736 Views
937 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp E-Series

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Pure FlashArray X NVMe and NetApp E-Series compete in the data storage market. Pure FlashArray X NVMe often has an edge in efficiency and performance due to its advanced data technologies, particularly in settings where low latency and data management are priorities.

Features: Pure FlashArray X NVMe provides cutting-edge NVMe technology, high performance, and advanced data reduction, making it efficient for data management. NetApp E-Series offers flexibility, straightforward capacity expansion, and supports varied workloads and environments, focusing on scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pure FlashArray X NVMe is known for an easy installation process and reliable customer service, simplifying the initial setup. NetApp E-Series, while offering reliable support, may have more complex installation procedures.

Pricing and ROI: Pure FlashArray X NVMe typically has a higher initial cost with promises of substantial ROI from operational efficiency and data management. NetApp E-Series is competitively priced, appealing to budget-conscious buyers but may provide a longer ROI period due to less aggressive performance.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp E-Series

Ranking in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Ranking in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

All-Flash Storage (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category, the mindshare of NetApp E-Series is 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is 2.9%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

A very cost-effective and reliable product for Big Data Analytics, Technical Computing, Video Surveillance, and Backup and Recovery

The E-2800 and E5700 have built-in storage to storage replication for full capacity! By that it meant; customers do not need to worry about DRS. All of the E-Series models offer all RIAD types, 1, 10, 5, 6, etc; so you will get more flexibility to create RAID groups based on your application requirements. The other thing is that it is almost plug-and-play; it is a good friend for storage support engineers. Secondly, at the same time, it is very simple to create RGs, Volumes, and host mappings; so for customers, it is also simple and easy to perform storage admin-related tasks.

Read full review

Jaehoon Oh

Chief Technology Officer at Lambda256

Supports efficient storage management through volume snapshots and offers reliable non-disruptive upgrades

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could be enhanced. I can see the performance statistics in the Pure Storage console, but it does not show the performance by 4K byte unit. It displays IOPS and bandwidth, but IOPS is about real use, and I want to know how many IOPS are currently running in 4K byte units. I cannot see that IOPS because most storage systems report their performance by 4K byte unit. I want to see Pure Storage performance by 4K byte unit to compare with other storage or other internal NVMe SSD.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My customers are satisfied with the performance."

"The overall experience has been positive."

"Customers go for the E Series if they need backup storage because it is cheap."

"The product is easy to use."

"It's helped us because we've changed fundamentally what we talk about. We don't talk about storage and different tiers of storage anymore nor do we talk about servers. We talk now about applications and how applications impact the business and end users."

"The database workloads are pretty fast because I frequently move data from here to there."

"We are satisfied with the performance as it is significantly faster compared to traditional storage options."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its ease of use and performance."

"It's incredibly easy to use and greatly simplified our ability to both deploy and manage our storage subsystems."

"The solution is scalable."

"I appreciate the performance."

"It offers competitive performance, and the Evergreen storage model of Pure fits well with my organization."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros

Cons

"The solution must provide more training courses."

"With NetApp E-Series, when we are running active-active NAS4, sometimes due to either an issue or a bug, we experience failures. At least twice yearly, we have seen this issue. When it occurs, we lose critical systems such as MQ."

"Though the performance is there, if NetApp wants to be competitive with the others, it must improve their business continuity."

"NetApp should add more production lines to the E series so we can make flexible solutions more easily."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the dashboard and management could be simplified."

"Many options to check performance, like read, writes, random writes, and random reads, are missing in Pure FlashArray X NVMe."

"It is on the expensive side."

"If the customer only needs 500 terabytes and doesn't care how much data they'll put in the server, IBM is cheaper than Pure."

"One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them."

"The tool's pricing is higher than competitors."

"Adding some functions to the product would be beneficial."

"The software layer has to improve."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable for NetApp E-Series."

"Given its price, Pure is not the first option."

"Pretty much everything that you need is licensed when you buy the product. Licensing to me is different than the maintenance cost, but they can bleed into one another. We buy the product, and we expect three years of support bundled into what we negotiate on our storage arrays. I would start to see maintenance costs going into the fourth year, but we're not there yet."

"The support cost per array is about $20,000 a year for 24/7 support."

"Pure FlashArray X NVMe’s pricing is cheaper than other products."

"The product is expensive."

"Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD."

"They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit."

"With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

35%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp E-Series?

The product is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp E-Series?

The price is reasonable for NetApp E-Series.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp E-Series?

The solution must provide more training courses. I have a team of nine people. Three or four of them are administrators. They need to learn the solution. It would be helpful if NetApp provided a fr...

See all answers

What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

The price of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is very expensive, though I do not know the actual price because I am using the Evergreen monthly payment. I do not know the exact device price, but I think the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

See all answers

Comparisons

Seagate Exos X Series vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 26% of the time

NetApp ASA vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 24% of the time

NetApp AFF vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 16% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 13% of the time

VAST Data vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 8% of the time

More NetApp E-Series Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 25% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 17% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 10% of the time

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

July 2025

Download NetApp E-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

August 2025

Download Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report

Also Known As

No data available

Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X

Overview

NetApp E-Series offers a flexible, high-performance storage solution ideal for handling intensive data requirements. Designed to optimize capacity and improve data availability, it supports diverse sector needs.

NetApp E-Series is a purpose-built system engineered to deliver fast, consistent performance. It is best utilized in environments requiring high-performance workloads where speed and efficiency are crucial. Users appreciate its reliability and scalability, which contribute to effective data management. The system is known for its efficient storage capabilities, providing robust data protection and seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

What are the key features of NetApp E-Series?

Scalability: Supports expansion to accommodate growing data needs seamlessly.
Performance: Delivers high-speed processing for demanding applications.
Integrations: Easily integrates with existing IT environments, enhancing operational efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Offers competitive pricing with long-term savings through energy-efficient designs.
Reliability: Provides consistent uptime, minimizing disruptions and improving productivity.
Flexibility: Versatile deployment options cater to specific performance and capacity requirements.

NetApp E-Series is widely implemented across industries ranging from healthcare to finance, where it supports critical data-intensive applications. Its deployment in environments such as scientific research and media production highlights its capacity for handling high-speed data access and reliable performance.

NetApp

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company

Buyer's Guide

NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe

July 2025

Free Report: NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe report.

See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.