NetApp E-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe comparison

NetApp and Pure Storage are both solutions in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category. NetApp is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while Pure Storage is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. NetApp holds a 2.0% mindshare in N, compared to Pure Storage’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pure Storage users who would recommend it.

NetApp E-Series

Read 3 NetApp E-Series reviews

365 Views
164 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Read 35 Pure FlashArray X NVMe reviews

917 Views
371 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp E-Series

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Pure FlashArray X NVMe and NetApp E-Series compete in the data storage market. Pure FlashArray X NVMe often has an edge in efficiency and performance due to its advanced data technologies, particularly in settings where low latency and data management are priorities.

Features: Pure FlashArray X NVMe provides cutting-edge NVMe technology, high performance, and advanced data reduction, making it efficient for data management. NetApp E-Series offers flexibility, straightforward capacity expansion, and supports varied workloads and environments, focusing on scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pure FlashArray X NVMe is known for an easy installation process and reliable customer service, simplifying the initial setup. NetApp E-Series, while offering reliable support, may have more complex installation procedures.

Pricing and ROI: Pure FlashArray X NVMe typically has a higher initial cost with promises of substantial ROI from operational efficiency and data management. NetApp E-Series is competitively priced, appealing to budget-conscious buyers but may provide a longer ROI period due to less aggressive performance.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp E-Series

Ranking in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

10th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Ranking in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

All-Flash Storage (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category, the mindshare of NetApp E-Series is 2.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is 2.8%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

A very cost-effective and reliable product for Big Data Analytics, Technical Computing, Video Surveillance, and Backup and Recovery

The E-2800 and E5700 have built-in storage to storage replication for full capacity! By that it meant; customers do not need to worry about DRS. All of the E-Series models offer all RIAD types, 1, 10, 5, 6, etc; so you will get more flexibility to create RAID groups based on your application requirements. The other thing is that it is almost plug-and-play; it is a good friend for storage support engineers. Secondly, at the same time, it is very simple to create RGs, Volumes, and host mappings; so for customers, it is also simple and easy to perform storage admin-related tasks.

Read full review

Eugene Hemphill

Sales Manager at Multicomputos PR

Helps to save money and resources with the data compression feature

One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them. One way to improve the product is to add an operational assistant that doesn't depend on VMware. It could also establish more alliances with other operational systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to use."

"Customers go for the E Series if they need backup storage because it is cheap."

"My customers are satisfied with the performance."

"It has benefited my organization because it has reduced time to insights."

"We're able to get higher-density workloads on the same infrastructure, and we have a smaller physical footprint. The performance is excellent – during our test the bottlenecks are never on the X array, it just keeps picking up the pace to match what you need. The real-time visibility is a differentiator in my opinion."

"The high availability of the product is the most valuable feature."

"It is very easy to install and configure. It has got excellent diagnostics. If you really need to see how the box is performing, the console gives you a lot of information. You can set thresholds as well as alerts based on the thresholds, which is a very powerful functionality. They are very proactive. They know how to monitor and manage the systems. They see a problem, and they are all over it before us. They see the problem before we see it, which is very good."

"It's helped us because we've changed fundamentally what we talk about. We don't talk about storage and different tiers of storage anymore nor do we talk about servers. We talk now about applications and how applications impact the business and end users."

"I appreciate the performance."

"Everything, especially the VMs inside, is pretty fast."

"On a scale of one to ten, I rate Pure FlashArray as ten."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros

Cons

"Though the performance is there, if NetApp wants to be competitive with the others, it must improve their business continuity."

"The solution must provide more training courses."

"NetApp should add more production lines to the E series so we can make flexible solutions more easily."

"One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them."

"Adding some functions to the product would be beneficial."

"I want to see Pure Storage not only be for fast storage, but I want to see it be for the entire data center."

"The tool's pricing is higher than competitors."

"We would like to see VNC integration or be able to use Pure Storage with VNC."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the dashboard and management could be simplified."

"Efficiency improvements would always be welcome, but I'm not sure if they could get more efficient."

"Many options to check performance, like read, writes, random writes, and random reads, are missing in Pure FlashArray X NVMe."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable for NetApp E-Series."

"The support cost per array is about $20,000 a year for 24/7 support."

"With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."

"They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit."

"The tool's pricing is cheap; I rate it a six to seven out of ten. Most of our sales are not subscription-based. We sell the hardware, and customers keep using it. They only renew the service part annually. The support can be a bit pricey, but the solution is more cost-effective than anything else out there."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Pretty much everything that you need is licensed when you buy the product. Licensing to me is different than the maintenance cost, but they can bleed into one another. We buy the product, and we expect three years of support bundled into what we negotiate on our storage arrays. I would start to see maintenance costs going into the fourth year, but we're not there yet."

"We pay approximately $50,000 USD per year in licensing fees."

"Given its price, Pure is not the first option."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

39%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp E-Series?

The product is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp E-Series?

The price is reasonable for NetApp E-Series.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp E-Series?

The solution must provide more training courses. I have a team of nine people. Three or four of them are administrators. They need to learn the solution. It would be helpful if NetApp provided a fr...

See all answers

What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

I am an engineer and am not aware of the setup cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

Adding some functions to the product would be beneficial. Storage replication should be essential, and the analytics should not incur extra charges. This is one of the main things organizations need.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp ASA vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 37% of the time

Seagate Exos X Series vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 32% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 31% of the time

More NetApp E-Series Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 29% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 18% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 14% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 9% of the time

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

May 2025

Download NetApp E-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

May 2025

Download Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report

Also Known As

No data available

Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X

Overview

NetApp E-Series offers a flexible, high-performance storage solution ideal for handling intensive data requirements. Designed to optimize capacity and improve data availability, it supports diverse sector needs.

NetApp E-Series is a purpose-built system engineered to deliver fast, consistent performance. It is best utilized in environments requiring high-performance workloads where speed and efficiency are crucial. Users appreciate its reliability and scalability, which contribute to effective data management. The system is known for its efficient storage capabilities, providing robust data protection and seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

What are the key features of NetApp E-Series?

Scalability: Supports expansion to accommodate growing data needs seamlessly.
Performance: Delivers high-speed processing for demanding applications.
Integrations: Easily integrates with existing IT environments, enhancing operational efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Offers competitive pricing with long-term savings through energy-efficient designs.
Reliability: Provides consistent uptime, minimizing disruptions and improving productivity.
Flexibility: Versatile deployment options cater to specific performance and capacity requirements.

NetApp E-Series is widely implemented across industries ranging from healthcare to finance, where it supports critical data-intensive applications. Its deployment in environments such as scientific research and media production highlights its capacity for handling high-speed data access and reliable performance.

NetApp

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company

Buyer's Guide

NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe

June 2025

Free Report: NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp E-Series vs. Pure FlashArray X NVMe report.

See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.