NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Wasabi comparison

NetApp and Wasabi Technologies are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Wasabi Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. NetApp holds a 7.4% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Wasabi Technologies’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Wasabi Technologies users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

5,213 Views
1,877 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Wasabi

Read 10 Wasabi reviews

2,141 Views
2,098 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Wasabi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and Wasabi are both cloud storage solutions with distinct features and capabilities. Based on user reviews, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP appears to have better data management features, while Wasabi is noted for its competitive pricing.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers advanced data management, integration options, and scalability, making it highly valuable for complex use cases. Wasabi provides straightforward and affordable storage without added complexities. Users prefer NetApp for intricate needs and Wasabi for cost-effective storage solutions.

Room for Improvement: NetApp users suggest enhancements in cost predictability and simplifying certain configurations, and better integration with other cloud services. Wasabi users recommend improving integration with other cloud services, enhancing data transfer speeds, and adding more security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is praised for smooth implementation and robust customer support, though some find the initial setup complex. Wasabi is commended for its simple setup process and responsive customer service, making deployment easier.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users report high initial setup costs but note good ROI due to extensive features. Wasabi users like the low setup costs and quick ROI due to its straightforward pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Storage (2nd), Cloud Backup (14th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Wasabi

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 7.4%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wasabi is 6.4%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

DavidWork

Owner at Earthclick.net

Offers reliable and cost-effective backups with impressive stability

We use Wasabi to back up all of our WordPress sites. Anytime we have a new website, it's just easy to add it The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy. We have never had an outage, and it is very reliable and stable. Since it is so inexpensive, it does not impact our profit…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are definitely in the process of reducing our footprint on our secondary data center and all those snapshots technically reduce tape backup. That's from the protection perspective, but as far as files, it's much easier to use and manage and it's faster, too."

"The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site."

"I like how you can easily pair on-prem with the cloud and the cloud backup feature. I like the whole integration with on-prem and the cloud for SnapMirror relationships."

"One of the most valuable features is its similarity to the physical app, which makes it familiar. It's almost identical to a real NetApp, which means you can run all of the associated NetApp processes and services with it. Otherwise, we would definitely have to deploy some hardware on a site somewhere, which could be a challenge in terms of CapEx."

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient."

"The solution’s unified file and block-storage access across our infrastructure is invaluable. Without it, we can't do what we do."

"Multiprotocol is the most valuable because Amazon was not able to provide us with access to the same data from Linux and from Windows clients. That was our value proposition for CVO, Cloud Volumes ONTAP."

"NetApp's Cloud Manager automation capabilities are very good because it's REST-API-driven, so we can completely automate everything. It has a good overview if you want to just have a look into your environment as well."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."

"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."

"The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy."

"Overall, I would rate Wasabi a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."

"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."

More Wasabi pros

Cons

"The navigation on some of the configuration parameters is a bit cumbersome, making the learning curve on functions somewhat steep."

"I think the challenge now is more in terms of keeping an air gap. The notion that it is in the cloud, easy to break, etc. The challenge now is mostly about the air gap and how we can protect that in the cloud."

"The product is more restricted with underlying cloud."

"I rate the scalability a five out of ten."

"We want to be able to add more than six disks in aggregate, but there is a limit of the number of disks in aggregate. In GCP, they provide less by limiting the sixth disk in aggregate. In Azure, the same solution provides 12 disks in an aggregate versus GCP where it is just half that amount. They should bump up the disk in aggregate requirement so we don't have to migrate the aggregate from one to another when the capacities are full."

"I would like to see more information about Cloud Volumes ONTAP using Google Cloud Platform on NetApp's website."

"They definitely need to stay more on top of security vulnerabilities. Our security team is constantly finding Java vulnerabilities and SQL vulnerabilities. Our security team always wants the latest security update, and it takes a while for NetApp to stay up to speed with that. That would be my biggest complaint."

"I would like some more performance matrices to know what it is doing. It has some matrices inherent to the Cloud Volumes ONTAP. But inside Cloud Manager, it would also be nice to see. You can have a little Snapshot, then drill down if you go a little deeper."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."

"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."

"The scalability could improve."

"Wasabi could be cheaper."

"The most important improvement we would like to see in Wasabi is the ability to find files and folders easily on the platform, as it is not very easy at all right now."

"The scalability could be improved."

"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."

"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."

More Wasabi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

"Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two."

"Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost."

"For enterprise customers, it's a very cost effective. But in the SMB segment, yeah, pricing is a little bit challenge for your time."

"The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable."

"Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration."

"Our licensing is based on a yearly subscription. That is an additional cost, but because of the storage efficiencies that the NetApp gives, even with the additional cost of the NetApp license, you still end up saving money versus straight Azure native for storage. It's definitely worth it."

"They have a very good price which keeps our customers happy."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

"Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."

"The price of the solution is inexpensive."

"I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."

"The tool’s price is very reasonable."

"Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."

"Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."

"The price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

What do you like most about Wasabi?

The tool is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wasabi?

We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wasabi?

The most important improvement we would like to see in Wasabi is the ability to find files and folders easily on the platform, as it is not very easy at all right now.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 8% of the time

Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 6% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 49% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Wasabi

Compared 26% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Wasabi

Compared 3% of the time

More Wasabi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

June 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

July 2025

Download Wasabi product report

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

No data available

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

Wasabi Technologies

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

June 2025

Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.